On Oct 27, 2009, at 4:09 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
Hi folks,
there is a proposed timeline at
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/TPAC2009APIs#Agenda_Items
Please have a look, and if you think your input is important for any
session but you will be in a different session, or only
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Cyril Concolato
cyril.concol...@enst.fr wrote:
Hi Marcos,
Marcos Caceres a écrit :
Hi Cyril,
Thank you for again taking the the time to review the PC spec...
comments below.
2009/10/25 Cyril Concolato cyril.concol...@enst.fr:
Dear all,
I made a review
Below is the draft agenda for the October 29 Widgets Voice Conference
(VC).
NOTE for US PARTICIPANTS: the time will be ONE HOUR LATER!
Inputs and discussion before the VC on all of the agenda topics via
public-webapps is encouraged (as it can result in a shortened meeting).
Please address
Regrets, I will be traveling.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Below is the draft agenda for the October 29 Widgets Voice Conference (VC).
NOTE for US PARTICIPANTS: the time will be ONE HOUR LATER!
Inputs and discussion before the VC on all of the
Le lundi 26 octobre 2009 à 05:24 -0700, Arun Ranganathan a écrit :
The latest revision of the FileAPI editor's draft is available here:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/
The WebIDL checker identifies a couple of simple bugs in the draft:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Below is the draft agenda for the October 29 Widgets Voice Conference (VC).
NOTE for US PARTICIPANTS: the time will be ONE HOUR LATER!
Inputs and discussion before the VC on all of the agenda topics via
Dear IETF,
As part of the Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration Specification
progressing to Last Call, the W3C Web Applications Working Group would
like to begin registration procedures for the application/widget MIME
type.
We have written a draft of the registration text for you to
Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
Le lundi 26 octobre 2009 à 05:24 -0700, Arun Ranganathan a écrit :
The latest revision of the FileAPI editor's draft is available here:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/
The WebIDL checker identifies a couple of simple bugs in the draft:
Hi,
Using wttjs [1], I have generated a bunch of low-level test cases for
the Widgets Interface spec, based on its WebIDL, and uploaded them to:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-api/tests/idl-gen/
Since I don’t have a widgets engine that would implement the spec, I
haven’t been able to check
Jonas,
When loadend was removed from media elements [2] I wished to determine
whether it was event overkill to also fire at successful reads. Sounds
like you want it back for successful reads as well?
But the reason why loadend *and load* was removed from video do not
apply here. The
10 matches
Mail list logo