Hi all,
Sorry to be slow in responding to all the feedback on Indexed DB. As
you know, this is now my unpaid work and I am trying my best to
respond to comments before the weekend is up.
But this is good. Please keep the feedback and early implementation
experience coming.
On Jan 30,
On Jan 31, 2010, at 11:33 PM, Nikunj Mehta wrote:
d. The current draft fails to format in IE, the script that
comes with the page fails with an error
I am aware of this and am working with the maintainer of ReSpec.js
tool to publish an editor's draft that displays in IE. Would it be
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Nikunj Mehta nik...@o-micron.com wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry to be slow in responding to all the feedback on Indexed DB. As you
know, this is now my unpaid work and I am trying my best to respond to
comments before the weekend is up.
But this is good. Please keep
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Nikunj Mehta nik...@o-micron.com wrote:
On Jan 26, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Pablo Castro wrote:
These are notes that we collected both from reviewing the spec (editor's
draft up to Jan 24th) and from a prototype implementation that we are
working on. I didn't
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010, Sebastian Andersson wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:31, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
Right now, today, if I were to expose a WebSocket service on my
Dreamhost shared server, I could do so without any trouble. If we used
a scheme such as the one described above
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:29:23 +0100, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi, how interest is for you develop new APIs in order to enable a reuse of
the XMLHttpRequest objects, without the need to call abort method?
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:45:54 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
I'm not really convinced we need all of
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/UMP/
to handle the simple use case it is for. I think UMP can be layered on
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:38:08 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:46:03 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc
wrote:
1. Update .responseText
2. If readystate is not yet 3, set it to 3
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:14:44 +0100, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com
wrote:
At this thread we can point reason to create or not an new api for:
restart, reset, clear states, turn new to reuse, the XHR object. I have
opened another thread to know from the experts the currents workarounds
to
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
3. Fire a 'progress', unless 'loadstart' or 'progress' has been fired
within the past 50ms
This is already required elsewhere. I suppose I could try to merge the
two, would that be useful?
The main point of my email
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:12:18 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
It is still unclear what the relationship is between responseText
being set to a non-empty value, and switching to the LOADING state is.
Which happens first (it's somewhat clear that responseText is changed
before
Just to be clear, I believe Pierre was referring to file extensions (e.g.
.jpg) not browser extensions.
At any rate, I think it would be convenient, if you are able to get a File
handle, to also be able to get an image representation of the file. That
could be some thumbnail if the OS has already
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
Can responseText ever be non-empty without being in the LOADING state?
I.e. do these to actions happen from the same, or from separate, tasks
posted to the event loop?
The same.
I could make this more explicit if you
Yes but in Windows XP they upscale anything over 48x48 I believe.
On 1 February 2010 01:24, timeless timel...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/1/29 Pierre-Antoine LaFayette pierre.lafaye...@gmail.com:
Perhaps if we found some creative commons icons to use as defaults for
the
most used extensions. It
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:56:57 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
Can responseText ever be non-empty without being in the LOADING state?
I.e. do these to actions happen from the same, or from separate, tasks
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:56:57 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
Can responseText ever be non-empty without being in the LOADING state?
So it seems like there is a general consensus that at least some parts of
the icon URI scheme are useful and are worth standardizing. One thing I was
confused about was the mention of the File object; I initially believed we
were referring to http://www.mozilla.org/js/js-file-object.html, however,
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:26:46 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:56:57 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc
wrote:
Where in the spec is this defined? I guess my answer is yes, it'd be
On Feb 1, 2010, at 4:04 AM, Pierre-Antoine LaFayette wrote:
Yes but in Windows XP they upscale anything over 48x48 I believe.
According to the internets, icons for Windows Vista or later are supposed to
include bitmaps up to 256x256 (6 total sizes in the standard format) and will
actually be
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:49:55 +0100, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
Apart from the obvious worry of switching away from a behavior that
the vast majority of UAs currently implement, with the ensuing
potential for website breakage, sounds fine...
I know...
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:47, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010, Sebastian Andersson wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:31, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
Right now, today, if I were to expose a WebSocket service on my
Dreamhost shared server, I could do so without any
Going a bit back to current spec and changing underlying files - here is an
update on our thinking (and current implementation plan). We played with
File/Blob ideas a little more and talked with some of our app developers. In
regard to a problem of changing file, most folks feel the Blob is best
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Dmitry Titov dim...@chromium.org wrote:
Basically, it's app-specific choice. It appears that the
following implementation goes along with the current edition of the spec but
also provides the ability to detect the file change:
1. File derives from Blob, so
In section 4.3.2, point 6, the In case of error... paragraph says:
2. If the error callback returns false, then move on to the next statement,
if any, or onto the next overall step otherwise.
3. Otherwise, the error callback did not return false, or there was no error
callback. Jump to the last
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, Dumitru Daniliuc wrote:
In section 4.3.2, point 6, the In case of error... paragraph says:
2. If the error callback returns false, then move on to the next statement,
if any, or onto the next overall step otherwise.
3. Otherwise, the error callback did not return false,
Thanks for clarifying this, Ian.
Dumi
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, Dumitru Daniliuc wrote:
In section 4.3.2, point 6, the In case of error... paragraph says:
2. If the error callback returns false, then move on to the next
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, Sebastian Andersson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:47, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010, Sebastian Andersson wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:31, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
Right now, today, if I were to expose a WebSocket service on my
A few comments inline marked with [PC].
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Nikunj Mehta
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 11:37 PM
To: Kris Zyp
Cc: Arthur Barstow; public-webapps
Subject: Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API;
28 matches
Mail list logo
