On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:34 AM, timeless timel...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/2/3 Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com:
You've been getting a lot of feedback from Mozilla. Jonas Sicking,
Robert O'Callahan, and Boris Zbarsky are all leading members of the
Mozilla community.
I guess that makes me a
I¹d like to jump in here and address this point:
³While I agree that timing information is important, I don't think it's
going to be so commonly used that we need to add convenience features
for it. Adding a few event listeners at the top of the document does
not seem like a big burden.²
I work
I’d like to jump in here and address this point:
“While I agree that timing information is important, I don't think it's
going to be so commonly used that we need to add convenience features
for it. Adding a few event listeners at the top of the document does
not seem like a big burden.”
I work
I¹d like to jump in here and address this point:
³While I agree that timing information is important, I don't think it's
going to be so commonly used that we need to add convenience features
for it. Adding a few event listeners at the top of the document does
not seem like a big burden.²
I work
Hi,
On Feb 3, 2010, at 09:47 , Cyril Concolato wrote:
I've been informed by the ISO secretariat that the liaison from MPEG was sent
to the W3C and that the right persons this time have received it. Is it
correct? Can you tell me what the next step is ? Has the group discussed it ?
What is
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:09:26 +0100, Stephen Jolly
stephen.jo...@rd.bbc.co.uk wrote:
All,
As actioned in the 21st Jan teleconference, here are the use cases that
have motivated my specific proposal for supporting local network access
in the WARP spec (see
The draft minutes from the 4 February Widgets voice conference are
available at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2010/02/04-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before 11 February (the
On 4 Feb 2010, at 15:15, Arve Bersvendsen wrote:
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:09:26 +0100, Stephen Jolly stephen.jo...@rd.bbc.co.uk
wrote:
As actioned in the 21st Jan teleconference, here are the use cases that have
motivated my specific proposal for supporting local network access in the
WARP
Hi Arve,
Alternatively, should fine-grained distinction between the three, these
could alternatively be keywords in the existing origin attribute.
+1
It matches the proposal at http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-access-upnp/,
although the name of that document is misleading.
Thanks,
Marcin
On 31 Jan 2010, at 14:23, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:01:12 +0100, Thomas Roessler t...@w3.org wrote:
With apologies for the belated Last Call comment -- the XMLHttpRequest
specification
http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/
... doesn't have meaningful security
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Lenny Rachitsky
lenny.rachit...@webmetrics.com wrote:
I’d like to jump in here and address this point:
“While I agree that timing information is important, I don't think it's
going to be so commonly used that we need to add convenience features
for it. Adding a
Hi all,
After PC, I'm looking now at the Widget Interface spec, in particular to check
the test suite and produce the implementation report. I have a problem with the
spec. In GPAC, we implement only SVG not HTML5, with the Window object. So I'm
wondering how should the widget object be
Understood. I used to run the engineering department here at Webmetrics so I
understand the cost/benefit decisions that need to be made with any new
functionality. However coming from the web performance industry anything
that could help website owners understand and track their performance better
Hi all,
While trying to implement the widget interface spec [1], I found two typos:
- a user agent can to support = a user agent can support
- missing closing parenthese in conjunction to the preferences attribute).
I have also some remarks/questions:
* A user agent whose start file implements
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
I don't think I've ever seen a Web server send Vary: Cookie. I don't know
offhand if they consistently send enough cache control headers to prevent
caching across users.
I've been doing a little poking around. Wikipedia
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Tyler Close tyler.cl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
I don't think I've ever seen a Web server send Vary: Cookie. I don't know
offhand if they consistently send enough cache control headers to prevent
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Tyler Close tyler.cl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
I don't think I've ever seen a Web server send Vary: Cookie. I don't
know offhand if they consistently send enough cache control headers to
prevent
17 matches
Mail list logo
