On Mar 23, 2010, at 2:44 AM, Robin Berjon wrote:
On Mar 23, 2010, at 06:39 , Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Indexed Database API
Programmable HTTP Caching and Serving
Uniform Messaging Policy
Selectors API Level 2
Widgets Access Request Policy
Widgets URI Scheme
Widgets View Mode
I tried to omit
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:06:45 +0100, John Gregg john...@google.com wrote:
After the extensive discussion several weeks ago, I've been working on a
new draft for Web Notifications which is now available at
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebNotifications/publish/
The Web IDL should be cleaned
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:26:32 +0100, Jian Li jia...@google.com wrote:
To be safe, probably UA can choose to create the unique name from the
GUID, like blob-5597cb2e-74fb-479a-81e8-10679c523118.
Which GUID? Is that in the File API specification?
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
I mean UUID. It is the UUID part in URN of the File API spec. The UA can
choose any appropriate way to generate a unique string, like UUID.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:26:32 +0100, Jian Li jia...@google.com wrote:
To be
Unless we want to treat the blob same as string, we might have to provider
some sort of filename. Since without it, the server side might have problem
to save it temporarily.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:24:52 +0100, Dmitry
This looks good. One thing which I suggested previously but which didn't
make it into the spec is the ability for the UA to eliminate duplicate
notifications. Since I've been using the existing experimental notifications
API in Chrome, I've found that duplicate notifications are very common and
Why couldn't FormData.append(Blob) provide optional parameters to allow the
caller to specify the name and type?
-Darin
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:24:52 +0100, Dmitry Titov dim...@google.com
wrote:
Seriously though, it
Apologies if this has been discussed before, but I'm curious why URN is not
a property of Blob. It seems like it would be useful to be able to load a
slice of a File. For example, this could be used by an application to fetch
all of its subresources out of a single file.
-Darin
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:06 PM, John Gregg john...@google.com wrote:
After the extensive discussion several weeks ago, I've been working on a
new draft for Web Notifications which is now available at
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebNotifications/publish/
Not sure if this has been asked
Blob would need a content-type for that, but it could probably easy be added
as a property that is assignable.
BTW if the Blob could have a urn and mime type, this info could be directly
used to form the headers for the Blob when sending it in multipart form
using FormData.
Dmitry
On Tue, Mar
This has been discussed before, not sure what the conclusion was (if any)
http://www.mail-archive.com/public-webapps@w3.org/msg06137.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/public-webapps@w3.org/msg06345.htmlsnip
In order for the URN to be useful, it would have to have a mediaType
associated with it,
11 matches
Mail list logo
