[widgets] Widget API Test Suite Updated, was Re: ACTION-585: After TWI test suite updated, send an annoucement to public-webapps (Web Applications Working Group)

2010-10-02 Thread Marcos Caceres
The Widgets test suite has been updated. We have removed tests for openURL, as it was dropped from the Widget Interface spec. For 9 assertions there are now 50 tests, with 100% coverage of the spec (including an exhaustive run through the WebIDL).

Re: [widgets] Widget API Test Suite Updated, was Re: ACTION-585: After TWI test suite updated, send an annoucement to public-webapps (Web Applications Working Group)

2010-10-02 Thread Marcos Caceres
(wrong link to test in prev email, correct link below...) On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Marcos Caceres marc...@opera.com wrote: The Widgets test suite has been updated. We have removed tests for openURL, as it was dropped from the Widget Interface spec. For 9 assertions there are now 50

Re: [widgets] Best practice / recommendation for widget id scheme?

2010-10-02 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:  The widget element's id attribute says An IRI attribute that denotes an identifier for the widget. and is silent on the value of the IRI's scheme. What, if anything, do vendors recommend for the scheme? I guess

ISSUE-135 (DOMAttributeChangeRequestEvent): Consider adding DOMAttributeChangeRequestEvent

2010-10-02 Thread Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-135 (DOMAttributeChangeRequestEvent): Consider adding DOMAttributeChangeRequestEvent http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/135 Raised by: Doug Schepers On product: James Craig http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2010JulSep/0106.html: [[ The following proposal is for