Hi Marcos,
Le mardi 15 février 2011 à 13:19 +0100, Marcos Caceres a écrit :
Can we please get a full rundown of the systems available on test
server. Can we also have all the details about getting access to the
server, etc.
Here is what I know off the top of my head:
* the content on
On 02/17/2011 09:55 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
(I see that Art documented most of this in
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Testing_Requirements but thought
this ought to be confirmed on the list)
Is there some way to make put this documentation in some common location
rather
On Feb/17/2011 5:04 AM, ext James Graham wrote:
On 02/17/2011 09:55 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
(I see that Art documented most of this in
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Testing_Requirements but thought
this ought to be confirmed on the list)
Is there some way to make put this
On 02/17/2011 01:03 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On Feb/17/2011 5:04 AM, ext James Graham wrote:
On 02/17/2011 09:55 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
(I see that Art documented most of this in
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Testing_Requirements but thought
this ought to be confirmed on
- Original Message -
Step 7 of the FileReader.readAsDataURL() algorithm currently just
says:
Set the result attribute to be blob's data content represented as a
Data URL
It should, I think, say something about the using the type of the blob
as well as the content of the blob
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111
Summary: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not
match implementation behavior
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch, 2011-02-14 10:13 +:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
What high priority work must be done such that this spec is ready to be
re-published as a new Last Call Working draft?
Tab, do you know of anything that is blocking redoing an LC?
On 02/17/2011 06:55 AM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
- Original Message -
Step 7 of the FileReader.readAsDataURL() algorithm currently just
says:
Set the result attribute to be blob's data content represented as a
Data URL
It should, I think, say something about the using the type of
James Graham jgra...@opera.com, 2011-02-17 11:04 +0100:
On 02/17/2011 09:55 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
(I see that Art documented most of this in
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Testing_Requirements but thought
this ought to be confirmed on the list)
Is there some way to
David,
Arun,
I'm assuming that you mean for the resulting data:// URL to have a
mime
type in it, right? But the spec just says to take the blob's data
content and doesn't say anything about using the type of the blob
when
creating the URL.
Yes, you're absolutely right, I understand
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Arun Ranganathan
aranganat...@mozilla.com wrote:
David,
Arun,
I'm assuming that you mean for the resulting data:// URL to have a
mime
type in it, right? But the spec just says to take the blob's data
content and doesn't say anything about using the type of
Also, what should we do when you enqueue a setVersion transaction and then
close the database handle? Maybe an ABORT_ERR there too?
Yeah, that'd make sense to me. Just like if you enque any other
transaction and then close the db handle.
We don't abort transactions that are already in
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:02 AM, ben turner bent.mozi...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, what should we do when you enqueue a setVersion transaction and then
close the database handle? Maybe an ABORT_ERR there too?
Yeah, that'd make sense to me. Just like if you enque any other
transaction and then
On 2/17/11 2:00 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
I think data-urls are allowed to have no content-type. Just like http
requests can return no content-type header.
A difference is that if HTTP returns no content-type header then the
type is sniffed, whereas a data: URI with no media-type is treated as
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:02 AM, ben turner bent.mozi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Also, what should we do when you enqueue a setVersion transaction and
then
close the database handle? Maybe an ABORT_ERR there too?
Yeah,
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Orlow
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 11:51 AM
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:02 AM, ben turner bent.mozi...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12114
Summary: Blocked setVersion transactions should be aborted when
their database is closed
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.comwrote:
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Jeremy Orlow
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 11:51 AM
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc
is assigned to Nikunj right now but I think that's just because
of an editing glitch. Nikunj please let me know if you were working on it,
otherwise I'll just submit the changes once I hear some feedback from this
group.
Thanks
-pablo
Left file: \IndexedDB
Specs\20110217
Hi Pablo,
I will reassign this bug to Eliott.
Nikunj
On Feb 17, 2011, at 6:38 PM, Pablo Castro wrote:
btw - the bug is assigned to Nikunj right now but I think that's just because
of an editing glitch. Nikunj please let me know if you were working on it,
otherwise I'll just submit the
20 matches
Mail list logo
