On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 20:31:04 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
MooTools is basically identical to Prototype, except that you can
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 14:37:31 +0200, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
wrote:
The From-Origin spec is WebApps'; it is _not_ a joint deliverable with
the proposed WebAppSec WG.
I assumed it was because of Secure Cross-Domain Framing and the
significant overlap.
I discussed this with
On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 16:46 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 16:09:17 +0200, Philippe De Ryck
philippe.der...@cs.kuleuven.be wrote:
The CORS specification fails to protect legacy servers from POST
messages with arbitrary body formatting.
You can create pretty much any
On Aug 3, 2011, at 10:21 , Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 14:37:31 +0200, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
wrote:
The From-Origin spec is WebApps'; it is _not_ a joint deliverable with the
proposed WebAppSec WG.
I assumed it was because of Secure Cross-Domain Framing
+Alexey (2nd editor on the HyBi websockets spec).
Yes, the compression scheme currently in the draft will most probably be
dropped in the next revision. Most probably because that was the consensus in
the f2f meeting last week, but in the IETF, all decision have to be confirmed
on the mailing
On 8/3/2011 8:51 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 17:46:50 +0200, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
What's the difference?
ele.setAttribute(x, val) works on any element. ele[x] = val does not.
They also behave differently for a large number of cases and the
latter often
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Anne would like to publish a new WD of DOM Core and this is a Call for
Consensus (CfC) to do so:
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
Agreeing with this proposal: a) indicates support for
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Joran Greef jo...@ronomon.com wrote:
I have been spending time on IDB lately and wanted to give feedback as to the
transaction auto-commit interface:
I am trying to write a wrapper around IDB to match the interface of my
server-side data store, which allows
The following comment contains detailed information about a few issues
that were identified during a recent security analysis of 13 W3C
standards, organized by ENISA (European Network and Information Security
Agency), and performed by the DistriNet Research Group (K.U. Leuven,
Belgium).
The
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13634
Summary: Document autoimplementation.html and link to it more
prominently
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 21:52:22 +0200, Ian Jacobs i...@w3.org wrote:
If we really want to rescind a Recommendation, we should do that through
the process defined for that. If we want to update people on where to
find more recent information (but still the current specification is
still valid
EDITORIAL
Section The EventSource interface
it is said in the first step for UA Resolve the URL specified in url, relative
to the entry script's base URL.
I would put a link to
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/urls.html#resolve-a-url
--
Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/
Developer Relations
On 3 Aug 2011, at 4:07 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 21:52:22 +0200, Ian Jacobs i...@w3.org wrote:
If we really want to rescind a Recommendation, we should do that through the
process defined for that. If we want to update people on where to find more
recent information
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 23:24:44 +0200, Ian Jacobs i...@w3.org wrote:
Which is the best WG to make this request to the Director?
Since the DOM WG no longer exists that would be this WG I think.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
On 3 Aug 2011, at 4:28 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 23:24:44 +0200, Ian Jacobs i...@w3.org wrote:
Which is the best WG to make this request to the Director?
Since the DOM WG no longer exists that would be this WG I think.
The operational bits for this process [1] are
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 19:43:28 +0200, Philippe De Ryck
philippe.der...@cs.kuleuven.be wrote:
CORS-ISOLATION-1.Unique Origins: When run in a document with a globally
unique identifier for an origin, the Origin header specification
requires that null should be sent as the value of the Origin
16 matches
Mail list logo