http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13772
Summary: Example code should contain a comma instead of
semicolon: worker.port.postMessage({ foo:
'structured', bar: ['data', 'also', 'possible']});
Product: WebAppsWG
Versi
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
> On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 19:20:58 +0200, Luke Zarko wrote:
> > void initMessageEvent(in DOMString typeArg, in boolean canBubbleArg, in
> > boolean cancelableArg, in any dataArg, in DOMString originArg, in DOMString
> > lastEventIdArg, in WindowProxy? so
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 02:44:32 +0200, Rafael Weinstein
wrote:
Although everyone seems to agree that mutations should be delivered
after the DOM operations which generated them complete, the question
remains:
When, exactly, should mutations be delivered?
I created http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 21:18:43 +0200, Charles Pritchard
wrote:
On 8/12/11 12:03 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Before we add yet another set of features, when are we going to attempt
to get interoperability on the current feature set?
Some time after adding another set of features, I'd imagine.
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:02:56 +0200, Doug Schepers wrote:
After discussion with PLH and Ian Jacobs, and I don't think it's
necessary for us to go through the additional overhead of rescinding the
DOM 2 View specification.
Instead, PLH and I support Anne's original proposal to simply update t
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 19:20:58 +0200, Luke Zarko wrote:
void initMessageEvent(in DOMString typeArg, in boolean canBubbleArg, in
boolean cancelableArg, in any dataArg, in DOMString originArg, in
DOMString
lastEventIdArg, in WindowProxy? sourceArg, in sequence
transferablesArg);
Can we still re
