On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:49:19 +0200, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com
wrote:
Many services use form-urlencoded for form data, though not for files,
and typically not for large strings.
Google's Picasa uses multipart/related instead of multipart/form-data.
I believe that Google App engine has
On 8/30/2011 11:03 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:49:19 +0200, Charles Pritchard
ch...@jumis.com wrote:
Many services use form-urlencoded for form data, though not for
files, and typically not for large strings.
Google's Picasa uses multipart/related instead of
On 8/30/2011 7:11 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Charles Pritchardch...@jumis.com wrote:
On 8/30/11 5:52 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Charles Pritchardch...@jumis.com
wrote:
On 8/24/2011 11:56 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
On
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 06:22:05 +0200, Arun Ranganathan a...@mozilla.com
wrote:
On 8/14/11 6:00 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Why can you not use characters legally allowed in IRIs?
You can; they have to be escaped.
Yeah sure, every URI is an IRI, but that is not what I am asking.
The bit on
This model should be rephrased a bit to make it more clear what the
requirements are. E.g. I think if you use POST it should not be a MAY but
a MUST that 500 is returned.
Also what are the security errors you can get a 500 for? Are they not
handled by 403? I think handling them with 403 is
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 06:20:58 +0200, Arun Ranganathan a...@mozilla.com
wrote:
Done.
Thanks!
I noticed a few small things:
* HTML5 should be without space
* Progress Events is pointing to a dated version rather than the latest;
Charles is also no longer an editor; 1.0 can be dropped
--
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 06:12:06 +0200, Arun Ranganathan a...@mozilla.com
wrote:
On 8/14/11 5:36 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
I think FileList should talk less about selected files and more about
being a collection or list of File objects. That way it can be reused
in the future without people
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 06:17:17 +0200, Arun Ranganathan a...@mozilla.com
wrote:
On 8/14/11 5:42 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Why does the slice() method use [TreatUndefinedAs=EmptyString]? Can it
not just use the normal default handling? Also, if you do indeed want
to use that saying If the
On 8/13/11 6:19 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:02:56 +0200, Doug Schepers schep...@w3.org
wrote:
After discussion with PLH and Ian Jacobs, and I don't think it's
necessary for us to go through the additional overhead of rescinding
the DOM 2 View specification.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
On 8/30/2011 7:11 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Charles Pritchardch...@jumis.com
wrote:
On 8/30/11 5:52 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Charles
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
I think defining all of these in one specification is fine. Currently the
specification is only 37 pages when printed. That will certainly grow once
we add ranges, examples, and more introductory text, but will also
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:52:34 +0200, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Is this explicitly mentioned in the spec? Otherwise how will anyone be
able to take advantage of this fact?
I guess we could explicitly mention it somewhere. On the other hand,
everything has references and
/webapps/20110831
Splitting off to its own thread, because this deserves a good discussion.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:33:16 +0200, Dominic Cooney domin...@chromium.org
wrote:
Thanks for reading this far! These proposals aren't formal or
On 8/31/2011 10:19 AM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Simple case:
var callback = function(blob) { xhr.send(blob); };
formData.toBlob(callback, 'multipart/form-data');
Several services require signed messages
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org wrote:
I will write up the exact algorithm in a wiki shortly.
Here it is: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Component_Model_Progressive_Enhancement
:DG
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
Doesn't it seem more likely that the third-party will do the
registration in whatever script you include that implements the Like
button, or whatever?
That's just a matter of convention, no? I don't think it's
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Simple case:
var callback = function(blob) { xhr.send(blob); };
formData.toBlob(callback, 'multipart/form-data');
Several services require
Hi Art,
I've updated the bug. Microsoft is fine with this new validation requirement.
In the absence of other comments, I suggest that we update the draft and move
on to Last Call.
...Brian
-Original Message-
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com]
Sent: Monday, August
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Vincent Scheib sch...@google.com wrote:
I believe first developers seek a specifiable solution that will provide a
consistent application experience on all platforms and API implementations.
Yes, the raw input method provides this. (I don't like calling it
I think for convenience registration probably should be carried around
with the component, because:
1. It is convenient for the author using the component.
2. If the component library reuses its own abstractions, it probably
expects them to have a specific element name. Putting registration in
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Dominic Cooney domin...@chromium.org wrote:
Components (see
http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Component_Model_Use_Cases for examples of
what I mean) need to present an API to script. For example, a
contacts component might want to expose a refresh() method that
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Dominic Cooney domin...@chromium.org wrote:
Components (see
http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Component_Model_Use_Cases for examples of
what I mean) need to present an API to script. For example, a
contacts component might want to expose a refresh() method that
On 8/31/2011 10:57 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Glenn Maynardgl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Jonas Sickingjo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Simple case:
var callback = function(blob) { xhr.send(blob); };
formData.toBlob(callback,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Dominic Cooney domin...@chromium.orgwrote:
I think for convenience registration probably should be carried around
with the component, because:
1. It is convenient for the author using the component.
2. If the component library reuses its own abstractions,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Erik Arvidsson a...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 22:33, Dominic Cooney domin...@chromium.org wrote:
You will notice that this says nothing about how prototypes are wired
up. It should. Maybe the argument to extend should have an optional
second
Referencing a note dated 2003 may not sound strong any more - web-based
applications (or to be more specific - their UI) have evolved significantly
since the date. Today limiting developers to an extremely low level markup
API, such as SVG or HTML only leads to huge, hardly manageable JavaScript
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13984
Summary: Need a way to object detect binary support before
connecting
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13792
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
29 matches
Mail list logo
