Re: DOM4 not compatible with ACID3 tests

2011-09-09 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 02:02:15 +0200, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: Attribute nodes in any shape or form. [...] Noted on the wiki. Anything with mutation events. We want to deprecate them entirely. Could not find any tests for these. (By deprecate you mean remove, right? :-))

Re: [DOM3Events] CR

2011-09-09 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 21:04:33 +0200, Jacob Rossi jacob.ro...@microsoft.com wrote: All of the Last Call issues formally raised in our Tracker have been addressed as indicated in our Disposition of Comments [1]. If there are outstanding issues, then they're likely threads on www-dom that got

Re: RfC: how to organize the DOM specs [Was: CfC: publish new WD of DOM Core]

2011-09-09 Thread Olli Pettay
On 09/07/2011 05:09 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote: On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Arthur Barstowart.bars...@nokia.com wrote: Some members of the group consider the D3E spec as the highest priority of our DOM-related specs and they have put considerable resources into that spec. Doug and Jacob will

Re: [WebIDL] remove modules

2011-09-09 Thread Paddy Byers
Hi, Cameron McCormack: WAC is using modules solely as a grouping mechanism, and not as a namespacing mechanism, as far as I can see. So it seems like no actual important functionality would be lost if we dropped modules from Web IDL. If all you need to do is group some definitions together

Re: RfC: how to organize the DOM specs [Was: CfC: publish new WD of DOM Core]

2011-09-09 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 9/9/11 6:27 AM, ext Olli Pettay wrote: On 09/07/2011 05:09 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote: On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Arthur Barstowart.bars...@nokia.com wrote: Some members of the group consider the D3E spec as the highest priority of our DOM-related specs and they have put considerable

Re: [DOMCore] Web messaging references

2011-09-09 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 20:19:42 +0200, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote: There are various specifications that include terminology warnings as part of their reference to DOMCore. Can we reduce the cost of including DOMCore references in basic APIs, by adding some kind of supporting

CfC: publish LC#2 of Web IDL; deadline September 16

2011-09-09 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi All - based on the changes made to address the comments received [1] for Web IDL LC #1, Cameron recommends WebApps publish LC#2 and this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to do so: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/ This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to record the group's

RE: publish LC#2 of Web IDL; deadline September 16

2011-09-09 Thread Travis Leithead
I support publishing this LC#2. I will do a second review of the updated text to see if Microsoft has any further LC comments. Thanks! -Original Message- From: public-script-coord-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-script-coord- requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arthur Barstow Sent: Friday,

Re: DOM4 not compatible with ACID3 tests

2011-09-09 Thread Jonas Sicking
Anything using the following functions which seem useless or otherwise have been discussed to be removed:  Node.isSameNode  Text.replaceWholeText Could not find the former, noted the latter. I did not know by the way we wanted to remove isSameNode(). Works for me. a.isSameNode(b) is the

[DOM4] Remove Node.isSameNode

2011-09-09 Thread Jonas Sicking
It's a completely useless function. It just implements the equality operator. I believe most languages have a equality operator already. Except Brainfuck [1]. But the DOM isn't implementable in Brainfuck anyway as it doesn't have objects, so I'm ok with that. [1]

Fwd: W3C Workshop on the Future of Offline Web Applications (Call for Participation)

2011-09-09 Thread Arthur Barstow
Speaking of application caches and widgets, below is an announcement about a Future of Offline Web Applications workshop on Saturday November 5 in Redwood City CA US: http://www.w3.org/2011/web-apps-ws/ Position Papers are due September 30. Original Message Subject: Join

Fwd: W3C Workshop on the Future of Offline Web Applications (Call for Participation)

2011-09-09 Thread Arthur Barstow
Speaking of application caches and widgets, below is an announcement about a Future of Offline Web Applications workshop on Saturday November 5 in Redwood City CA US: http://www.w3.org/2011/web-apps-ws/ Position Papers are due September 30. Original Message Subject: Join

Re: [DOM4] Remove Node.isSameNode

2011-09-09 Thread Sean Hogan
On 10/09/11 3:21 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: It's a completely useless function. It just implements the equality operator. I believe most languages have a equality operator already. Except Brainfuck [1]. But the DOM isn't implementable in Brainfuck anyway as it doesn't have objects, so I'm ok with

[websockets] Getting WebSockets API to Last Call

2011-09-09 Thread Brian Raymor
The IETF HyBi WG has moved beyond Last Call and has presented the WebSockets protocol to the IESG for approval:   http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi/current/msg08640.html Now that the protocol is more stable, I think that the current WebSockets API is feature complete and meets

Re: [DOM4] Remove Node.isSameNode

2011-09-09 Thread Charles Pritchard
On Sep 9, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Sean Hogan shogu...@westnet.com.au wrote: On 10/09/11 3:21 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: It's a completely useless function. It just implements the equality operator. I believe most languages have a equality operator already. Except Brainfuck [1]. But the DOM isn't

Re: [DOM4] Remove Node.isSameNode

2011-09-09 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote: On Sep 9, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Sean Hogan shogu...@westnet.com.au wrote: On 10/09/11 3:21 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: It's a completely useless function. It just implements the equality operator. I believe most languages have

Re: [WebSocket API] .binaryType

2011-09-09 Thread Jonas Sicking
Trying to cut to the important bits, so skipped a lot. On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: Regarding 1: The usecase for blobs in general would be downloading large messages where the contents of the message won't be immediately used, but rather stored for later

Re: [DOM4] Remove Node.isSameNode

2011-09-09 Thread Sean Hogan
On 10/09/11 11:00 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Sean Hoganshogu...@westnet.com.au wrote: On 10/09/11 3:21 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: It's a completely useless function. It just implements the equality operator. I believe most languages have a equality operator

Re: [DOM4] Remove Node.isSameNode

2011-09-09 Thread Bjoern Hoehrmann
* Jonas Sicking wrote: It's a completely useless function. It just implements the equality operator. I believe most languages have a equality operator already. It's quite normal for object models to not guarantee that the equality operator works for object identity comparison, COM being a prime

Re: [DOM4] Remove Node.isSameNode

2011-09-09 Thread Charles Pritchard
On 9/9/2011 6:02 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Charles Pritchardch...@jumis.com wrote: On Sep 9, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Sean Hoganshogu...@westnet.com.au wrote: On 10/09/11 3:21 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: It's a completely useless function. It just implements the

[Bug 13989] Need a spec for ErrorEvent constructor

2011-09-09 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13989 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 13990] Need a spec for CloseEvent constructor

2011-09-09 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13990 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 14083] status box is too big. wrong id?

2011-09-09 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14083 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 14057] In section The WebSocket interface when describing the operation of the WebSocket constructor, the following statement is made: Return a new WebSocket object, and continue these steps

2011-09-09 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14057 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED