On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Hi All,
In both the Firefox and the Chrome implementation you can pass an
empty array to IDBDatabase.transaction in order to create a
transaction which has a scope that covers all objectStores in the
database.;
This,
Hi,
I’m interested in the component model proposal [1] and tried to
imagine what architecture patterns our apps would follow by using it.
I wrote my notes here [2] and I’d like you to read and comment them.
The most difficult problem to solve seems to be the way components
will be bound together
So it sounds like everyone agrees that accepting an empty array is not
desired... Can we just make that case throw an exception rather than
generating an empty transaction (which will then throw when it is
used)?
-Ben Turner
This is a Call for Consensus to publish a WD of the File API spec (last
published 26-Oct-2010):
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/
Positive response to this CfC is preferred and encouraged and silence
will be considered as agreement with the proposal. The deadline for
comments is
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
On Thursday, October 06, 2011 5:44 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Hi All,
In both the Firefox and the Chrome implementation you can pass an empty
array to IDBDatabase.transaction in order to create a transaction which has
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 7:44 AM, ben turner bent.mozi...@gmail.com wrote:
So it sounds like everyone agrees that accepting an empty array is not
desired... Can we just make that case throw an exception rather than
generating an empty transaction (which will then throw when it is
used)?
I'm
On Monday, October 10, 2011 9:46 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
On Thursday, October 06, 2011 5:44 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Hi All,
In both the Firefox and the Chrome implementation you can pass an
empty array to
On Monday, October 03, 2011 10:04 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Joshua Bell jsb...@chromium.org wrote:
As we're implementing IDBFactory.cmp in WebKit we noticed that the
ordering sense is reversed compared to C's strcmp/memcmp, Perl's
cmp/= operators, etc.
As
[ Sorry for the cross posting ... ]
If you are looking for a conference focused on using Web APIs and HTML5
e.g. to develop Web apps, design Web apps, etc., check out this November
15-16 W3Conf conference in Redmond WA US:
[[
http://w3conf.org/
= 2011: HTML5 and the Open Web Platform
W3C,
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, Roland Steiner wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
* Any case of taking an element with existing semantics (e.g. a select
showing a list of countries) and replacing its presentation with
something completely different (e.g. a
Is there interest or presence on this list from major SQL vendor
developers such as PostgreSQL and MySQL?
WebSQL received a thumbs-down from the postgresql developers mailing
list. Now that that issue is over...
MySQL and PostgreSQL core developers have specialized knowledge, I want
to see
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
Is there interest or presence on this list from major SQL vendor developers
such as PostgreSQL and MySQL?
WebSQL received a thumbs-down from the postgresql developers mailing list.
Now that that issue is over...
MySQL
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011, Daniel Cheng wrote:
What's the difference between addElement and setDragImage()?
The spec says:
The difference between setDragImage() and addElement() is that the
latter automatically generates the image based on the current
rendering of the elements added
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 10/7/11 8:32 AM, ext Julian Reschke wrote:
As far as I recall, we agreed in the IETF WG that parsing of web socket URIs
should work exactly the same way as for any other URI scheme. It appears
that the API spec now tries to override this, and
On 10/10/2011 3:26 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011, Daniel Cheng wrote:
What's the difference between addElement and setDragImage()?
The spec says:
The difference between setDragImage() and addElement() is that the
latter automatically generates the image based on the current
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 15:26, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
The parenthetical isn't the important part (that's why it's
parenthetical). The important difference between setDragImage() and
addElement() is that the latter automatically generates the image based on
the current rendering of
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Daniel Cheng wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 15:26, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
The parenthetical isn't the important part (that's why it's
parenthetical). The important difference between setDragImage() and
addElement() is that the latter automatically
On 10/10/2011 4:15 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Daniel Cheng wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 15:26, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
The parenthetical isn't the important part (that's why it's
parenthetical). The important difference between setDragImage() and
addElement() is
On 10/10/2011 1:44 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Charles Pritchardch...@jumis.com wrote:
Is there interest or presence on this list from major SQL vendor developers
such as PostgreSQL and MySQL?
I'd love to get input from SQL database developers! I don't have any
Splitting this up into two different things is great.
Allowing attaching an alternative shadow tree through CSS but
disabling any JS to be run seems like the right thing to do.
I'm also in favor of the is attribute. Even though I think that
x-foo is more readable than div is=foo it is hard to
On 10/10/2011 4:55 PM, Erik Arvidsson wrote:
Splitting this up into two different things is great.
Allowing attaching an alternative shadow tree through CSS but
disabling any JS to be run seems like the right thing to do.
I'm also in favor of the is attribute. Even though I think that
x-foo
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Erik Arvidsson wrote:
Splitting this up into two different things is great.
Allowing attaching an alternative shadow tree through CSS but disabling
any JS to be run seems like the right thing to do.
You wouldn't want to disable any JS. Just the API defining aspects.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
If an author invents a new element, it doesn't matter what it inherits
from. It won't have fallback behaviour, it won't have semantics that can
be interpreted by search engines and accessibility tools, it won't have
default
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
On 10/10/2011 1:44 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Charles Pritchardch...@jumis.com
wrote:
Is there interest or presence on this list from major SQL vendor
developers
such as PostgreSQL and
On 24/09/11 7:16 AM, Adam Klein wrote:
Chromium (myself, Rafael Weinstein, Erik Arvidsson, Ryosuke Niwa) and
Mozilla (Olli Pettay, Jonas Sicking) have worked together on a
proposal for a replacement for Mutation Events.
This proposal represents our best attempt to date at making a set of
Currently if a resource sharing check fails cookies will still be set for
a credentialed request similarly to how they would be with form or
img. However, it seems that HTML defines for img crossorigin that the
UA must act as if there was no response at all. That does not work of
course
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:53:35 +0900, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
Currently if a resource sharing check fails cookies will still be set
for a credentialed request similarly to how they would be with form or
img. However, it seems that HTML defines for img crossorigin that
the
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:53:35 +0900, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
Currently if a resource sharing check fails cookies will still be set for
a credentialed request similarly to how they would be with form or
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:20:40 +0900, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
If you do img crossorigin from A to B, and a resource sharing check
for B fails, cookies must not be set (per my reading of the HTML
specification).
My reading is wrong. Once HTML discards the resource the
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
On Tuesday, October 04, 2011 3:01 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Israel Hilerio
isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Based
30 matches
Mail list logo
