Original Message
Subject:RfC: LCWD of Web Socket API; comment deadline October 21
Resent-Date:Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:29:15 +
Resent-From:public-webapps@w3.org
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:28:29 -0400
From: ext Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
To:
On 2011-10-11 00:30, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 10/7/11 8:32 AM, ext Julian Reschke wrote:
As far as I recall, we agreed in the IETF WG that parsing of web socket URIs
should work exactly the same way as for any other URI scheme. It appears
that the API
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:25:42 +0200, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
wrote:
This is a Call for Consensus to publish a WD of the File API spec (last
published 26-Oct-2010):
Do it...
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/
Positive response to this CfC is preferred and encouraged
On 10/14/11 10:11 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:25:42 +0200, Arthur Barstow
art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
This is a Call for Consensus to publish a WD of the File API spec
(last published 26-Oct-2010):
Do it...
Thanks for encouragement :). The document is in pub
The people working on the D3E spec (namely Jacob, Doug and Olli) propose
below that the spec be published as a Candidate Recommendation and this
is a CfC to do so:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DOM-Level-3-Events/html/DOM3-Events.html
The comment tracking document for the last LCWD is:
This is a Call for Consensus to publish a new Working Draft of the
Indexed Database API spec (last published 19-Apr-2011):
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
Agreement to the proposal: a) indicates support for publishing a new WD;
and b) does not necessarily indicate
On Friday, October 07, 2011 4:35 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
On Friday, October 07, 2011 2:52 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Hi All,
There is one edge case regarding transaction scheduling that we'd like
to get clarified.
As the spec is written, it's clear what the following code should do:
On Monday, October 10, 2011 10:15 AM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2011 9:46 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Israel Hilerio
isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
On Thursday, October 06, 2011 5:44 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Hi All,
In both the
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2011 10:10 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
On Tuesday, October 04, 2011 3:01 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2011 10:15 AM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2011 9:46 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Israel Hilerio
isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
On Thursday,
The behavior Israel describes is the behavior that I would expect as a
developer.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.comwrote:
On Friday, October 07, 2011 4:35 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
On Friday, October 07, 2011 2:52 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Hi All,
On Friday, October 14, 2011 2:43 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2011 10:15 AM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2011 9:46 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:51 AM,
We have submitted 21 test cases for DOM L3 Events using WebApps WG's test
harness. They are now available here:
http://w3c-test.org/webapps/DOMEvents/tests/submissions/Microsoft/converted/
Please consider this email our Request for Review (RfR) for the test cases
listed below with a proposed
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14331
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
On Friday, October 14, 2011 2:43 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2011 10:15 AM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
On Monday, October
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14474
Summary: Make it possible to close a connection in such a
manner that all subsequent events are surpressed
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version:
On Friday, October 14, 2011 3:57 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
On Friday, October 14, 2011 2:43 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Israel Hilerio
isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
On Monday,
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 22:04:06 +0200, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
wrote:
This is a Call for Consensus to publish a new Working Draft of the
Indexed Database API spec (last published 19-Apr-2011):
Yes please.
cheers
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 04:27:50 +0900, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
wrote:
As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged
and silence will be considered as agreeing with the proposal. The
deadline for comments is October 21 and all comments should be sent to
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
On Friday, October 07, 2011 4:35 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
On Friday, October 07, 2011 2:52 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Hi All,
There is one edge case regarding transaction scheduling that we'd like
to get
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14331
vic99...@yandex.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
21 matches
Mail list logo
