RE: App Manifest API Proposal

2012-05-13 Thread SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
At least in the widget model, the manifest (including feature elements) provides a means of disclosure to the user about the APIs that the app wants to access. Of course if one assumes that users are brainless click-happy automatons then such disclosures are useless, but at that end of the

RE: App Manifest API Proposal

2012-05-13 Thread SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
Hi Anant, Thanks for the proposal. It's good to see this moving forward, following the workshop we had last year after TPAC. Some initial comments: 1) Re version: A string that represents the version of this manifest. The User-Agent does not interpret this value in any way and is opaque to

[Bug 17042] New: Last-Event-ID is not a simple header

2012-05-13 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17042 Summary: Last-Event-ID is not a simple header Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug 17042] Last-Event-ID is not a simple header

2012-05-13 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17042 Anne ann...@annevk.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs

2012-05-13 Thread Anant Narayanan
Hi Marcos, Thanks for the thorough review, this is extremely useful! Most things seems fixable fairly easily, for those that aren't, comments inline: On 5/12/2012 4:32 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote: default_locale: [Mandatory only if locales property is set]. The locale of the top-level name and

Re: App Manifest API Proposal

2012-05-13 Thread Anant Narayanan
On 5/12/2012 2:57 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote: On Saturday, 12 May 2012 at 21:14, Ian Hickson wrote: The installation security model of asking the user up-front to grant trust just doesn't work because users don't understand the question, and the installation security model of curating apps and

Re: App Manifest API Proposal

2012-05-13 Thread Anant Narayanan
Hi Sullivan, Thanks for your comments, some responses inline: On 5/13/2012 1:11 AM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote: 1) Re version: A string that represents the version of this manifest. The User-Agent does not interpret this value in any way and is opaque to everyone but the application itself.:

Re: App Manifest API Proposal

2012-05-13 Thread Scott Wilson
On 12 May 2012, at 19:02, Anant Narayanan wrote: Hi everyone, I recently joined the webapps working group and I'd like to introduce myself! I work at Mozilla and for the past year or so have been working on our Apps initiative [1]. Our goal has been to make it very easy for developers to

Re: App Manifest API Proposal

2012-05-13 Thread SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
Ok, thanks for the responses. For (1) we can expect a text change, right? For (2), If the app manifest if obtained over non-secure HTTP, it is subject to modification. If the app is delivered over non-secure HTTP, even more can be modified. So is the plan to provide some kind of user warning