On May 21, 2012, at 5:03 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Joran Greef wrote:
>> IndexedDB supports binary values as per the structured clone algorithm
>> as implemented in Chrome and Firefox.
>>
>> IndexedDB needs to support binary keys (ArrayBuffer, TypedArrays).
>>
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Eric U wrote:
> According to the latest editor's draft [1], a File object must always
> return an accurate lastModifiedDate if at all possible.
> "On getting, if user agents can make this information available, this
> MUST return a new Date[HTML] object initialize
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Joran Greef wrote:
> IndexedDB supports binary values as per the structured clone algorithm
> as implemented in Chrome and Firefox.
>
> IndexedDB needs to support binary keys (ArrayBuffer, TypedArrays).
>
> Many popular KV stores accept binary keys (BDB, Tokyo, Le
According to the latest editor's draft [1], a File object must always
return an accurate lastModifiedDate if at all possible.
"On getting, if user agents can make this information available, this
MUST return a new Date[HTML] object initialized to the last modified
date of the file; otherwise, this
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Joran Greef wrote:
> IndexedDB supports binary values as per the structured clone algorithm
> as implemented in Chrome and Firefox.
>
> IndexedDB needs to support binary keys (ArrayBuffer, TypedArrays).
>
> Many popular KV stores accept binary keys (BDB, Tokyo, L
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Kinuko Yasuda wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback!
>
> For context for others, I assume they are comments for the draft pushed at:
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/quota/Overview.html
>
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>
>> 1) Put storageInfo on w
IndexedDB supports binary values as per the structured clone algorithm
as implemented in Chrome and Firefox.
IndexedDB needs to support binary keys (ArrayBuffer, TypedArrays).
Many popular KV stores accept binary keys (BDB, Tokyo, LevelDB). The
Chrome implementation of IDB is already serializing
On Mon, 21 May 2012 12:28:16 +0200, Simon Pieters wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2012 02:17:45 +0200, Jason Duell
wrote:
So the Web Socket spec is a little vague on how JS is notified when
the targeted web socket server is down/nonexistent/etc.
Firefox is firing an 'error' event when this happens,
On Wed, 16 May 2012 02:17:45 +0200, Jason Duell
wrote:
So the Web Socket spec is a little vague on how JS is notified when
the targeted web socket server is down/nonexistent/etc.
Firefox is firing an 'error' event when this happens, based on the
language here in the W3C spec:
"if the stat
