Web Components Suggestion

2012-08-12 Thread Dave Geddes
Markup could be much cleaner if custom elements use the element name, rather than the is attribute. fancyButton/ instead of button is=fancyButton/

Re: Web Components Suggestion

2012-08-12 Thread Florian Bösch
It's my understanding that if you want to define a strict parser using a DTD that describes the markup, it's impossible to introduce arbitrary tage names (as in there are not tag wildcards in a DTD). A document that used arbitrary tags could not be validated. On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Dave

Re: [FileAPI] blob: protocol need a content-length header

2012-08-12 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 2:56 AM, Benjamin BERNARD benjamin.bern...@benvii.com wrote: Hi, I was developing an offline music web App when I discover that is no Content-length header specified here : http://www.w3.org/TR/FileAPI/#ProtocolExamples So when you play an audio/video file stored as a

Re: Web Components Suggestion

2012-08-12 Thread Tab Atkins Jr.
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Florian Bösch pya...@gmail.com wrote: It's my understanding that if you want to define a strict parser using a DTD that describes the markup, it's impossible to introduce arbitrary tage names (as in there are not tag wildcards in a DTD). A document that used

Re: Web Components Suggestion

2012-08-12 Thread Michael[tm] Smith
Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com, 2012-08-12 15:43 -0700: What Dimitri said, but to address your comment directly, DTD-based validation is long-dead, at least when applied to HTML. A DTD can't capture the validity requirements that the HTML spec already imposes, so it's irrelevant if it

Re: Web Components Suggestion

2012-08-12 Thread Michael[tm] Smith
Florian Bösch pya...@gmail.com, 2012-08-12 12:36 +0200: It's my understanding that if you want to define a strict parser using a DTD that describes the markup, it's impossible to introduce arbitrary tage names (as in there are not tag wildcards in a DTD). A document that used arbitrary tags