Re: [webcomponents]-ish: Visibility of work in Bugzilla

2012-08-16 Thread Chaals McCathieNevile
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:29:06 +0200, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: That's a great point. It's already tracking all of the Web Components work (it looks like I am by far the spammiest -- not the best of honors, but I'll take it). Perhaps we could just encourage people to listen to that? I suspect th

Re: [webcomponents]-ish: Visibility of work in Bugzilla

2012-08-16 Thread Dimitri Glazkov
That's a great point. It's already tracking all of the Web Components work (it looks like I am by far the spammiest -- not the best of honors, but I'll take it). Perhaps we could just encourage people to listen to that? :DG< On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote: > (12/08/1

Re: [webcomponents]-ish: Visibility of work in Bugzilla

2012-08-16 Thread Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
(12/08/17 0:36), Dimitri Glazkov wrote: > Another idea is to have a separate mailing list for this. At least, > there will be some opt-in step that will give other > public-webapps-nauts at choice. We have public-webapps-bugzilla[1] already, but I have no idea why we can't just turn on the compone

Re: [webcomponents]-ish: Visibility of work in Bugzilla

2012-08-16 Thread Brian Kardell
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: > Folks, > > Several peeps now mentioned to me that the visibility of work in > Bugzilla is not very high: a special step of watching an email is > required to get all the updates in real time. I do make the regular > update posts (as you ma

[webcomponents]-ish: Visibility of work in Bugzilla

2012-08-16 Thread Dimitri Glazkov
Folks, Several peeps now mentioned to me that the visibility of work in Bugzilla is not very high: a special step of watching an email is required to get all the updates in real time. I do make the regular update posts (as you may have noticed), but those are somewhat post-factum, and don't have t