[Bug 18611] Blob should support Transferable

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18611 Jonas Sicking changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug 18611] New: Blob should support Transferable

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18611 Summary: Blob should support Transferable Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug 18610] New: Transferable should expose a close() method

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18610 Summary: Transferable should expose a close() method Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Prio

[Bug 17736] Get "dereference" Blob URI terminology more in keeping with HTML5

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17736 Arun changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 17762] lastModifiedDate should not be nullable

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17762 Arun changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 17757] Editorial: Add a note about why Blobs aren't Transferable

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17757 Arun changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 16952] Add a Blob.close()

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16952 Arun changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

RE: [WEBIDL] nullable dictionary members

Thanks for the comment, Boris! Jungkee > -Original Message- > From: Boris Zbarsky [mailto:bzbar...@mit.edu] > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 3:26 PM > To: public-webapps@w3.org > Subject: Re: [WEBIDL] nullable dictionary members > > On 8/15/12 10:05 PM, Jungkee Song wrote: > > Having sa