On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Chaals McCathieNevile wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 03:03:19 +0200, Cameron McCormack wrote:
>> Chaals McCathieNevile:
>>> Frankly, I am deeply sceptical that the CSS group has managed to solve
>>> the social problem sufficiently well to make the technical solution
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 03:03:19 +0200, Cameron McCormack
wrote:
Chaals McCathieNevile:
Frankly, I am deeply sceptical that the CSS group has managed to solve
the social problem sufficiently well to make the technical solution
noticeably different from hasFeature.
I think the biggest differenc
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> Chaals McCathieNevile:
>> Frankly, I am deeply sceptical that the CSS group has managed to solve
>> the social problem sufficiently well to make the technical solution
>> noticeably different from hasFeature.
>
> I think the biggest diffe