Will this still allow a node which has an undo manager to be moved
from one part of the document to another part of the document, without
losing all transactions attached to the undo manager?
That seems like an important use case.
/ Jonas
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Ryosuke Niwa
No. Allowing the host to be moved without removing automatic transaction is
what causes the problem because automatic transactions need to keep
relevant nodes alive.
Essentially, this has the same problem has the magic iframe. We can
alternatively change the way automatic transactions work so
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
No. Allowing the host to be moved without removing automatic transaction is
what causes the problem because automatic transactions need to keep relevant
nodes alive.
Essentially, this has the same problem has the magic
On 8/20/12 5:05 PM, ext Michael[tm] Smith wrote:
Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com, 2012-08-20 08:11 -0400:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
kangh...@oupeng.com wrote:
We have public-webapps-bugzilla[1] already, but I have no idea why
we can't just turn on the
Marcos would like to publish a Proposed Edited Recommendation [PER] of
the Widget Packaging and XML Configuration spec [REC] to incorporate the
spec's errata and this is a Call for Consensus to do so.
The [Errata] has already been reflected in the [Proposed-PER] (see
[Diff]) and it includes a
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:20:34 +0200, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
wrote:
Marcos would like to publish a Proposed Edited Recommendation [PER] of
the Widget Packaging and XML Configuration spec [REC] to incorporate the
spec's errata and this is a Call for Consensus to do so.
I
a bugzilla 4 feature
kennyluck MikeSmith, hmm… ok. I won't be the person pushing for it.
MikeSmith kennyluck: I'd love to have it too but I don't think we are
going to be migrating to v4 any time soon
[1] http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20120821#l-128
Cheers,
Kenny
--
Web Specialist, Oupeng
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
No. Allowing the host to be moved without removing automatic transaction
is
what causes the problem because automatic transactions need to keep
[Re-sending from the proper address.]
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
No. Allowing the host to be moved without removing automatic transaction is
what causes the problem because
I recently participated in an internal thread at Google where it was
proposed to move a (webkit-specific) feature from an attribute to a
CSS property, because applying it via a property is *much* more
convenient.
Similarly, some of the a11y folks have recently been talking about
applying aria-*
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18242
Erika Doyle Navara erika.do...@microsoft.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18045
Erika Doyle Navara erika.do...@microsoft.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18033
Erika Doyle Navara erika.do...@microsoft.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15994
Erika Doyle Navara erika.do...@microsoft.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18218
Erika Doyle Navara erika.do...@microsoft.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18188
Erika Doyle Navara erika.do...@microsoft.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
I recently participated in an internal thread at Google where it was
proposed to move a (webkit-specific) feature from an attribute to a
CSS property, because applying it via a property is *much* more
convenient.
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18003
Erika Doyle Navara erika.do...@microsoft.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18080
Erika Doyle Navara erika.do...@microsoft.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18001
Erika Doyle Navara erika.do...@microsoft.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Hi,
I think there is an error missing on the delete method of the object store. All
other mutation operations have an InvalidStateError, except the delete method.
This error is also present on the delete method inside a cursor.
Greetings,
Kristof
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
Meh. I think this loses most of the CSS is so much more convenient
benefits. It's mainly the fact that you don't have to worry about whether
the nodes exist yet that makes CSS more convenient.
Note that this benefit is
On Aug 21, 2012 4:03 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
Meh. I think this loses most of the CSS is so much more convenient
benefits. It's mainly the fact that you don't have to worry about
whether
the nodes
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Brian Kardell bkard...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012 4:03 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
Meh. I think this loses most of the CSS is so much more convenient
benefits. It's
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Brian Kardell bkard...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012 4:03 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
Meh. I
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
Meh. I think this loses most of the CSS is so much more convenient
benefits. It's mainly the fact that you don't have to worry about whether
the
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Brian Kardell bkard...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
Correct. If we applied CAS on attribute changes, we'd have... problems.
Because you could do something like:
.foo[x=123]{ x: 234; }
Maciej, Ojan, and I had a further conversion about this matter off the
list, and we've concluded that we should drop the support for undoscope
content attribute altogether. So we're just going to do that and let
authors use iframe to have multiple undo managers.
I can keep it around in the spec
On 21 Aug 2012, at 13:20, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Marcos would like to publish a Proposed Edited Recommendation [PER] of the
Widget Packaging and XML Configuration spec [REC] to incorporate the spec's
errata and this is a Call for Consensus to do so.
The [Errata] has already been reflected
From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalm...@gmail.com]
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org
wrote:
Meh. I think this
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Travis Leithead
travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote:
From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalm...@gmail.com]
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012 5:40 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
On a somewhat unrelated note, could we somehow also incorporate jquery
style
live event handlers here? See previous www-dom discussion about this: .
I
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Brian Kardell bkard...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012 5:40 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
On a somewhat unrelated note, could we somehow also incorporate jquery
style
live
Comments inline...
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Brian Kardell bkard...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012 5:40 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Ojan Vafai
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
ul.special li {
onclick: alert('You clicked me!');
evt.target.classlist.add('clicked');;
}
This is certainly interesting, but...
1.
I *love* this idea!!
However, I’m afraid that in all these cases, ”it’s so much more convenient”
precisely due to the dynamic nature of CSS, so you don’t have to bind event
handlers to cater to document changes etc. I think this proposal would be much
more useful if it was dynamic in at least
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
ul.special li {
onclick: alert('You clicked me!');
On Aug 21, 2012 6:49 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Brian Kardell bkard...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012 6:18 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
So, in my current proposal, you can just set an onfoo attribute:
ul.special li
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Lea Verou l...@w3.org wrote:
I *love* this idea!!
However, I’m afraid that in all these cases, ”it’s so much more convenient”
precisely due to the dynamic nature of CSS, so you don’t have to bind event
handlers to cater to document changes etc. I think this
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com
3. Where did evt come from?
Isn't that one of the magically-defined
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Brian Kardell bkard...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012 6:49 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Brian Kardell bkard...@gmail.com wrote:
In other
words,
what is preventing you from writing...
.foo .bar{
FWIW, while I don't find the idea of attaching event listeners this way too
interesting (maybe I could be convinced, but event capturing is already
convenient for most of these examples), being able to say #myform input {
autocomplete: off; autocorrect: off; autocapitalize: off; } or a { rel:
Ah, right, mea culpa.
There’s still the option of restricting attribute selectors altogether or just
not responding to attribute changes, but doing so for other kinds of changes.
Of course being dynamic in some ways but not others will make it harder to
teach and learn, but I believe the
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
FWIW, while I don't find the idea of attaching event listeners this way too
interesting (maybe I could be convinced, but event capturing is already
convenient for most of these examples), being able to say #myform input {
Can we extend this to custom DOM element registration somehow?
ul.newsli {
identity: x-news-item;
}
or maybe even:
ul.newsli {
identity: url(//example.com/test/news.html#news-item);
}
:DG
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21,
Hi all,
Bryan Sullivan and myself have been working together on updating the Push API
draft based upon feedback received and the work being driven by Mozilla and
Telefonica to build a Push solution for Firefox OS (B2G).
You can find it at: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/push/raw-file/default/index.html
47 matches
Mail list logo
