Re: [IndexedDB] How to recover data from IndexedDB if the origin domain don't exist anymore?

Another perspective about the problem: what about doing so with "SharedIndexedDB" in the same way of SharedWorkers? They allow to be accessed using a name, so it would be useful also here... If you need a better use case, I've been last saturday on the FirefoxOS App Days here at Madrid and talking

Re: [whatwg] HTML5 web messaging - postMessage

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Jack (Zhan, Hua Ping) wrote: > If the government does not do a good job, we can criticize those in > position. > Employees of browser vendors are not tax-funded government employees. If volunteers do not do a good job, it's ok. > By the way, whatever we do, we

Re: [whatwg] HTML5 web messaging - postMessage

If the government does not do a good job, we can criticize those in position. If volunteers do not do a good job, it's ok. By the way, whatever we do, we should not expect all people to say to us: You did a good job. with best regards Jack (Zhan, Hua Ping) +1-647-971-6390

Re: [whatwg] HTML5 web messaging - postMessage

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Jack (Zhan, Hua Ping) wrote: > Dear Travis, > Glad to hear from you. > > Are you guys do volunteer job for that? or are you get paid for that? > If you guys are volunteering there, I have no say about. > If you guys do get paid, then please be professional and pu

Re: HTML5 web messaging - postMessage

Hi Jack. Here we are both profesionals, volunteers and mainly profesionals volunteering. W3C and WhatWG are not companies but only places where anybody can add propositions and discuss them, but here nobody get money (directly) from work here. Me, for example, I'm just an student. I can understand

Re: HTML5 web messaging - postMessage

Dear Travis, Glad to hear from you. Are you guys do volunteer job for that? or are you get paid for that? If you guys are volunteering there, I have no say about. If you guys do get paid, then please be professional and put things right at the first place. Bad standard wastes internet community's

RE: HTML5 web messaging - postMessage

Jack, With all due respect, this feedback is a little late. The spec in question is now at candidate recommendation, and there are multiple interoperable implementation in existence. While this is not to say that the spec cannot be changed at this point, I would anticipate that many participant

Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Streams API; deadline February 2

Hi all, Le 27/01/2013 03:23, Arthur Barstow a écrit : Feras would like to publish a First Public Working Draft (FPWD) of "Streams API" and this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to do so, using the following ED as the basis: This Cf

Re: HTML5 web messaging - postMessage

The postMessage design outlined in the W3C document edited by Ian Hickson is not good! The design of the cross document messaging by Ian Hickson (Google, Inc.) is very bad. Even the last version is not good either. The design can be sketched here as follows. The sender: var o = document.getElemen