On 14 May 2013, at 15:00, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 May 2013 at 14:32, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Scott indicated [1] Wookie implemented Widget Updates and Chaals
indicated [2] he would followup with Opera but I couldn't find a
response from them in the list archive.
Do we
Thanks for the feedback!
On May 19, 2013, at 9:25 PM, Kyaw Tun kyaw...@yathit.com wrote:
IDBKeyRange.inList looks practically useful, but it can be achieve continue
(continuePrimary) cursor iteration. Performance will be comparable except
multiple round trip between js and database.
I'm
On 13 May 2013 05:34, Charles McCathie Nevile cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote:
Hi,
to close ACTION-693 I scribbled some stuff into a very preliminary draft
of a URL spec:
On 5/20/13 12:54 PM, ext Melvin Carvalho wrote:
On 13 May 2013 05:34, Charles McCathie Nevile cha...@yandex-team.ru
mailto:cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote:
I hope there will be a bugzilla component really very soon, but I
neglected to request one so far.
Please do post the link to the
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Ben Kelly bke...@mozilla.com wrote:
Thanks for the feedback!
On May 19, 2013, at 9:25 PM, Kyaw Tun kyaw...@yathit.com wrote:
IDBKeyRange.inList looks practically useful, but it can be achieve
continue (continuePrimary) cursor iteration. Performance will be
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Kyaw Tun kyaw...@yathit.com wrote:
Sorry for reposting again for
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013AprJun/0422.html
Perhaps
I am not well explain enough.
In put and add method of object store and index, DataCloneError and
DataError are
This CfC has completed with support for shelving the Web Intents Addendum, Pick
Media Intent, and Pick Contacts Intent specifications.
Based on the CfC mail discussion (and DAP teleconference) we have also agreed
to publish Web Intents as a W3C WG Note to complete work (for now).
As with all
On May 20, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Joshua Bell jsb...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Ben Kelly bke...@mozilla.com wrote:
On May 19, 2013, at 9:25 PM, Kyaw Tun kyaw...@yathit.com wrote:
IDBKeyRange.inList looks practically useful, but it can be achieve continue
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Ben Kelly bke...@mozilla.com wrote:
On May 20, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Joshua Bell jsb...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Ben Kelly bke...@mozilla.com wrote:
On May 19, 2013, at 9:25 PM, Kyaw Tun kyaw...@yathit.com wrote:
IDBKeyRange.inList
Hello public-webapps,
I have been following along with web components, and am really excited
about the potential.
However, I just realized that unlike the DOM and CSS, there is no real
isolation for JavaScript in a custom element. In particular, the global
scope is shared.
This seems really
Aren't ES6 modules is a good-enough solution for this issue? They make
global collision rare and likely to be what the author really needed.
jjb
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Aaron Boodman a...@google.com wrote:
Hello public-webapps,
I have been following along with web components, and
Custom elements have a closure to work in, as well as their own prototypes.
I don't believe ES6 modules add much in this regard (possibly I'm missing
something there).
Separate global scope is a bigger issue.
I believe there was general agreement to pursue (at some point) an otp-in
'isolated'
Sorry, I always have problem with talking clearly.
Your experiment on this kind of problem is very interesting. I would like
to see what are optimal number of requests in a given transaction. These
two concepts (cursor walk and multi-request) can be employed together.
In my library
13 matches
Mail list logo
