Hi folks,
Attempting to parse the shadow-dom spec to gather test coverage data. Turns out
the markup significantly departs from other specs. Not sure if the spec is
edited using a special tool or by hand.
Regardless, adding a className of idl to WebIDL blocks would go a long way.
Think that's
Greetings,
During the last face to face we had a start of a discussion on what should fall
within the scope of the PUSH specification. I feel we should go a little
further on this matter.
As it is designed right now the whole system requires 3 APIs :
- one between the web application and the
Thanks for starting this thread, Arnaud. I have some responses below, and look
forward to discussions on these topics.
Bryan Sullivan
-Original Message-
From: arnaud.br...@orange.com [mailto:arnaud.br...@orange.com]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 9:05 AM
To: public-webapps@w3.org
On May 21, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Ben Kelly bke...@mozilla.com wrote:
On May 20, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Joshua Bell jsb...@google.com wrote:
Cool. Knowing what performance difference you see between multi-get and just
a bunch of gets in parallel (for time to delivery of the last value) will be
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
Regardless, adding a className of idl to WebIDL blocks would go a long way.
Think that's doable?
Sure thing! Please file a bug so we don't forget. It's easy -- click
the File a bug button in the top right corner of the
Done: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22254. Thanks.
--tobie
On Tuesday, June 4, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com
(mailto:tobie.lan...@gmail.com) wrote:
Regardless, adding a className of idl to
3
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Tobie Langel to...@fb.com wrote:
Done: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22254. Thanks.
--tobie
On Tuesday, June 4, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com
I think keeping the information about a URL is a cool idea and we need to do it:
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22255
:DG
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
4) your idea
On Jun 3, 2013, at 6:06 PM, Joshua Bell jsb...@google.com wrote:
Cool, thanks for sharing!
cursor: 329ms
get: 88ms
^ Not surprising, given the async overhead
get: 88ms
getAll: 71ms
inList: 44ms
^ Looking at the test, it seems like getAll is fetching
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21725
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
10 matches
Mail list logo