[shadow-dom] spec markup

2013-06-03 Thread Tobie Langel
Hi folks, Attempting to parse the shadow-dom spec to gather test coverage data. Turns out the markup significantly departs from other specs. Not sure if the spec is edited using a special tool or by hand. Regardless, adding a className of idl to WebIDL blocks would go a long way. Think that's

[PUSH API] Scope of the specification

2013-06-03 Thread arnaud.braud
Greetings, During the last face to face we had a start of a discussion on what should fall within the scope of the PUSH specification. I feel we should go a little further on this matter. As it is designed right now the whole system requires 3 APIs : - one between the web application and the

RE: [PUSH API] Scope of the specification

2013-06-03 Thread SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
Thanks for starting this thread, Arnaud. I have some responses below, and look forward to discussions on these topics. Bryan Sullivan -Original Message- From: arnaud.br...@orange.com [mailto:arnaud.br...@orange.com] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 9:05 AM To: public-webapps@w3.org

Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement

2013-06-03 Thread Ben Kelly
On May 21, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Ben Kelly bke...@mozilla.com wrote: On May 20, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Joshua Bell jsb...@google.com wrote: Cool. Knowing what performance difference you see between multi-get and just a bunch of gets in parallel (for time to delivery of the last value) will be

Re: [shadow-dom] spec markup

2013-06-03 Thread Dimitri Glazkov
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote: Regardless, adding a className of idl to WebIDL blocks would go a long way. Think that's doable? Sure thing! Please file a bug so we don't forget. It's easy -- click the File a bug button in the top right corner of the

Re: [shadow-dom] spec markup

2013-06-03 Thread Tobie Langel
Done: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22254. Thanks. --tobie On Tuesday, June 4, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com (mailto:tobie.lan...@gmail.com) wrote: Regardless, adding a className of idl to

Re: [shadow-dom] spec markup

2013-06-03 Thread Dimitri Glazkov
3 On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Tobie Langel to...@fb.com wrote: Done: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22254. Thanks. --tobie On Tuesday, June 4, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com

Re: [webcomponents] Interaction of shadow DOM, imports, base URIs

2013-06-03 Thread Dimitri Glazkov
I think keeping the information about a URL is a cool idea and we need to do it: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22255 :DG On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote: 4) your idea

Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement

2013-06-03 Thread Ben Kelly
On Jun 3, 2013, at 6:06 PM, Joshua Bell jsb...@google.com wrote: Cool, thanks for sharing! cursor: 329ms get: 88ms ^ Not surprising, given the async overhead get: 88ms getAll: 71ms inList: 44ms ^ Looking at the test, it seems like getAll is fetching

[Bug 21725] Specify id for Step 1 of the Web Workers Processing Model

2013-06-03 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21725 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED