Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Arthur Barstow > Which bug is that, and what do you mean by "HTML proper"? https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16789 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17930 HTML proper aka the document that defines HTML. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/

RE: Files on IndexedDB

Update: my comments were referring to the File API, not the IndexedDB API - I mistook the context of this thread (somehow) to be about the File API... nevermind! -Original Message- From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 11:18 AM To: Jonas Sicking; Arthur Barstow Cc: pira

RE: Files on IndexedDB

Comments below. -Original Message- From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:jo...@sicking.cc] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 8:56 AM To: Arthur Barstow Cc: pira...@gmail.com; Webapps WG Subject: Re: Files on IndexedDB Hi Art, Actually, the response in [2] says that we should clarify in the spec that

Re: [Bug 22130] Modification for IDBObjectStore's clear and delete method

Hi - your bug is considered a "Last Call comment" and it was included in the LC's comment tracking document [1]. In [2], Joshua proposed this bug be addressed as "Resolved/Later" and the bug has been closed as such. For the purposes of tracking your comment, please indicate if this resolutio

Re: [IndexedDB] Inform script of corruption recovery

Yes, for v2. Kyaw On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > Hi - your comment is considered a "Last Call comment" and it was included > in the LC's comment tracking document [1]. > > In [2], Joshua proposed this comment be addressed/resolved as a feature > request and as such, it

Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest.onerror for DataCloneError and DataError

Yes, thanks. Kyaw On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > Hi - your comment is considered a "Last Call comment" and it was included > in the LC's comment tracking document [1]. > > In [2], Joshua proposed this comment be addressed/resolved as a feature > request and as such, it

Re: Files on IndexedDB

On 6/11/13 7:56 PM, ext Jonas Sicking wrote: Hi Art, Actually, the response in [2] says that we should clarify in the spec that files, blobs and filelists are stored "by value" rather than "by reference". This is not a normative change since the spec already defines this behavior. However the be

Re: Files on IndexedDB

Hi Art, Actually, the response in [2] says that we should clarify in the spec that files, blobs and filelists are stored "by value" rather than "by reference". This is not a normative change since the spec already defines this behavior. However the behavior is defined somewhat indirectly which mea

[Bug 18242] Not clear what "script that invoked the method" means exactly. Should this be changed to "entry script" instead? If not, please specify what it means.

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18242 Boris Zbarsky changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug 18242] Not clear what "script that invoked the method" means exactly. Should this be changed to "entry script" instead? If not, please specify what it means.

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18242 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement

On Jun 11, 2013, at 2:21 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > Hi Ben - your comment is considered a "Last Call comment" and it was included > in the LC's comment tracking document [1]. > > In [2], Joshua proposed this comment be addressed/resolved as a feature > request and as such, it was added to the

Considering an onincompleteload event

Thought I'd at least open a discussion on the possibility of an onabort + onincompleteload event pair for webpages which would otherwise crash/take down the web browser. We've made it this far without adding such an event. An example case would be the one-page HTML5 spec; there are some setups

Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest.onerror for DataCloneError and DataError

Hi - your comment is considered a "Last Call comment" and it was included in the LC's comment tracking document [1]. In [2], Joshua proposed this comment be addressed/resolved as a feature request and as such, it was added to the IDB feature request list [3]. For the purposes of tracking your

Re: [IndexedDB] Inform script of corruption recovery

Hi - your comment is considered a "Last Call comment" and it was included in the LC's comment tracking document [1]. In [2], Joshua proposed this comment be addressed/resolved as a feature request and as such, it was added to the IDB feature request list [3]. For the purposes of tracking your

Re: Files on IndexedDB

Hi - your comment is considered a "Last Call comment" and it was included in the LC's comment tracking document [1]. In [2], Joshua proposed this comment be addressed/resolved as a feature request and as such, it was added to the IDB feature request list [3]. For the purposes of tracking your

Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement

Hi Ben - your comment is considered a "Last Call comment" and it was included in the LC's comment tracking document [1]. In [2], Joshua proposed this comment be addressed/resolved as a feature request and as such, it was added to the IDB feature request list [3]. For the purposes of tracking

[Bug 22130] Modification for IDBObjectStore's clear and delete method

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22130 Joshua Bell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18

On 6/11/13 11:59 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: This is a Call for Consensus to publish a Last Call Working Draft of the HTML Templates spec using the following document as the basis (it does not yet use the LC template):

Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > This is a Call for Consensus to publish a Last Call Working Draft of the > HTML Templates spec using the following document as the basis (it does not > yet use the LC template): > >

CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18

This is a Call for Consensus to publish a Last Call Working Draft of the HTML Templates spec using the following document as the basis (it does not yet use the LC template): This CfC satisfies the group's requirement