Hi Daniel,
On Monday, July 29, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Daniel Buchner wrote:
> FWIW, I ran a dev poll last week: ~95% of respondents
What was the sample size? Who were the developers? Where was the poll run?
> preferred a simple, separate HTML document specifically for their widget and
> use all th
On Jul 29, 2013 7:53 PM, "Takeshi Yoshino" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> Couldn't we simply let the Stream class have a content type, which
>
>
> That's what I meant. In Feras's proposal Stream has type attribute. I
copied it to my draft. read(As)Text woul
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>> How about we use what XMLHttpRequest and WebSocket have?
>>>
>>> Stream.prototype.readType takes an enumerated string
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> How about we use what XMLHttpRequest and WebSocket have?
>>
>> Stream.prototype.readType takes an enumerated string value which is
>> "arraybuffer" (default) or "text".
>>
>> Strea
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> Couldn't we simply let the Stream class have a content type, which
>> could contain an encoding. Then when stream.readText is called, if
>> there's an explicit encoding, it would u
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Couldn't we simply let the Stream class have a content type, which
> could contain an encoding. Then when stream.readText is called, if
> there's an explicit encoding, it would use that encoding when
> converting to text.
How about we use wh
On 7/29/13 4:15 PM, ext Yves Lafon wrote:
Hi,
In the PR [1], the text referencing WebIDL is not using one of the
three conformance clauses defined in WebIDL [2].
Could
"This specification uses [WebIDL] to specify application programming
interfaces." be clarified using one of the proposed word
Hi,
In the PR [1], the text referencing WebIDL is not using one of the three
conformance clauses defined in WebIDL [2].
Could
"This specification uses [WebIDL] to specify application programming
interfaces." be clarified using one of the proposed wordings from WebIDL?
(likely 'Conforming IDL
Couldn't we simply let the Stream class have a content type, which
could contain an encoding. Then when stream.readText is called, if
there's an explicit encoding, it would use that encoding when
converting to text.
/ Jonas
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 6:38 AM, Takeshi Yoshino wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18
FWIW, I ran a dev poll last week: ~95% of respondents preferred a simple,
separate HTML document specifically for their widget and use all the
existing DOM APIs and modules from across the web for things like storage,
localization, etc. In fact, of the only 2 respondents opposed to the idea,
one fu
10 matches
Mail list logo