Re: [clipboard events] seeking implementor feedback on using CID: URI scheme for pasting embedded binary data

2014-02-12 Thread Hallvord R. M. Steen
Hi Hallvord! Hi Ben! Thanks for responding to my request for feedback - especially since the IE team has done some interesting work in this area and is arguably ahead of the rest! :-) The IE11 API you mentioned is msConvertURL [1] (also on the IE blog [2]), and it was designed as a simple

RE: [clipboard events] seeking implementor feedback on using CID: URI scheme for pasting embedded binary data

2014-02-12 Thread Ben Peters
Hi Hallvord! The IE11 API you mentioned is msConvertURL [1] (also on the IE blog [2]), and it was designed as a simple way for sites to choose DataURI or Blob for otherwise inaccessible images. We default to DataURI to be interoperable with Firefox’s current design of always doing DataURI for

[progress-events] Progress Events is a W3C Recommendation

2014-02-12 Thread Arthur Barstow
Congratulations to Anne, Jungkee and Chaals on the publication of a Progress Events Recommendation http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-progress-events-20140211/ . (I updated this spec's PubStatus data to state that no additional work is planned and that the feature is now part of XHR.)

Re: Extending Mutation Observers to address use cases of

2014-02-12 Thread Olli Pettay
On 02/12/2014 04:27 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: On Feb 11, 2014, at 6:06 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann derhoe...@gmx.net wrote: * Olli Pettay wrote: We could add some scheduling thing to mutation observers. By default we'd use microtask, since that tends to be good for various performance reasons, but

Re: [progress-events] Progress Events is a W3C Recommendation

2014-02-12 Thread Jungkee Song
Thanks Art. The work is attributed to Anne, Chaals and Ms2ger. Thanks! On Feb 12, 2014 9:28 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: Congratulations to Anne, Jungkee and Chaals on the publication of a Progress Events Recommendation http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/

Re: Officially deprecating main-thread synchronous XHR?

2014-02-12 Thread Mounir Lamouri
On Sat, 8 Feb 2014, at 12:19, James Greene wrote: There are certain situations where sync XHRs are, in fact, required... unless we make other accommodations. For example, in the Clipboard API, developers are allowed to inject into the clipboard as a semi-trusted event during the event

Re: [manifest] orientation member

2014-02-12 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Monday, January 27, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com (mailto:w...@marcosc.com) wrote: Ok, makes sense. So my counter questions are: 1. Could we get away without using generic media queries and instead only

Re: [progress-events] Progress Events is a W3C Recommendation

2014-02-12 Thread Charles McCathie Nevile
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:49:07 +0400, Jungkee Song jungk...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Art. The work is attributed to Anne, Chaals and Ms2ger. Thanks! Actually, I did editing, like Jungkee, and the work is attributed to quite a lot of people, many of whom worked on it before the WebApps group

[Bug 24632] New: [meta][imports]: The spec should have fewer monkey patches

2014-02-12 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24632 Bug ID: 24632 Summary: [meta][imports]: The spec should have fewer monkey patches Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Linux

Re: Extending Mutation Observers to address use cases of

2014-02-12 Thread Rafael Weinstein
I pushed the Web Components folks about exactly this issue (why aren't these callbacks just MutationObservers?) early last year. They convinced me (and I remain convinced) that these signals should be Custom Element callbacks and not Mutation Observer records Here's the logic that convinced me:

[manifest] V1 ready for wider review

2014-02-12 Thread Marcos Caceres
The editors of the [manifest] spec have now closed all substantive issues for v1. The spec defines the following: * A link relationship for manifests (so they can be used with link rel=manifest). * A standard file name for a manifest resource (/.well-known/manifest.json). Works the same as

Re: Extending Mutation Observers to address use cases of

2014-02-12 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Feb 12, 2014, at 11:23 AM, Rafael Weinstein rafa...@google.com wrote: I pushed the Web Components folks about exactly this issue (why aren't these callbacks just MutationObservers?) early last year. They convinced me (and I remain convinced) that these signals should be Custom Element

Re: Extending Mutation Observers to address use cases of

2014-02-12 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@apple.com wrote: On Feb 12, 2014, at 11:23 AM, Rafael Weinstein rafa...@google.com wrote: In a certain sense, you can extend the argument that CE callbacks should be MO records, and you arrive at the conclusion that you don't need Custom

Re: Extending Mutation Observers to address use cases of

2014-02-12 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Feb 12, 2014, at 2:33 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@apple.com wrote: On Feb 12, 2014, at 11:23 AM, Rafael Weinstein rafa...@google.com wrote: In a certain sense, you can extend the argument that CE callbacks should be MO

[Bug 24638] New: [Shadow]: elementFromPoint should return the host when you hit a Text node

2014-02-12 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24638 Bug ID: 24638 Summary: [Shadow]: elementFromPoint should return the host when you hit a Text node Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC

[Bug 24639] New: [Shadow]: Each section on the spec needs examples

2014-02-12 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug ID: 24639 Summary: [Shadow]: Each section on the spec needs examples Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW

Re: [webcomponents] Encapsulation and defaulting to open vs closed (was in www-style)

2014-02-12 Thread Alex Russell
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On Feb 11, 2014, at 4:04 PM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On Feb 11, 2014, at 3:29 PM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org

[Bug 24349] [imports]: Import documents should always be in no-quirks mode

2014-02-12 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24349 Morrita Hajime morr...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Re: [manifest] V1 ready for wider review

2014-02-12 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Marcos Caceres mar...@marcosc.com wrote: The editors of the [manifest] spec have now closed all substantive issues for v1. The spec defines the following: * A link relationship for manifests (so they can be used with link rel=manifest). * A standard

[manifest] name and icons, was Re: [manifest] V1 ready for wider review

2014-02-12 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: I still think that leaving out name and icons from a manifest about bookmarks is a big mistake. I just made my case here http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2014Feb/0039.html I'll reply separately. Basically I