[gamepad] preventing default/capturing controller

2014-02-26 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Currently, the only way for a gamepad to be used as input would be to emulate mouse or keyboard events I'm wondering if it's in scope for this spec to also address the situation where a UA *does* already do this natively (for instance, IE on Xbox One) - analog stick moving an on-screen mouse

Re: what about this feature in template system in html5?

2014-02-26 Thread Arthur Barstow
Yarco - WebApps is no longer working on the HTML Templates spec. That feature was moved to [HTML5] and that spec says feedback should be sent to public-html-comments @ w3.org. -Regards, ArtB [HTML5] http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/ On 2/19/14 5:24 AM, ext Yarco Wang wrote: Hello, Guys: there?

[admin] Should WebApps' HTML Templates spec be published as a WG Note?

2014-02-26 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi Robin, Dimitri, All, Since HTML Templates is now part of HTML5, to help avoid confusion, I think WebApps' last TR of the spec ([html-templates]) should be replaced with a WG Note that clearly indicates WebApps' work on the standalone spec has stopped and the feature is now part of HTML5.

Re: [webcomponents]: Web Components in 2014

2014-02-26 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 2/13/14 5:00 PM, ext Dimitri Glazkov wrote: As promised, here's the plans and expectations summary for the Web Components spec umbrella. Apologies for taking so long. Thanks for this information Dimitri! (I just updated the Plans column of [PubStatus] accordingly.) To the extent WebApps

[Bug 24823] New: [ServiceWorker]: MAY NOT is not defined in RFC 2119

2014-02-26 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24823 Bug ID: 24823 Summary: [ServiceWorker]: MAY NOT is not defined in RFC 2119 Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Windows NT Status: NEW

Re: [Bug 24823] New: [ServiceWorker]: MAY NOT is not defined in RFC 2119

2014-02-26 Thread Bjoern Hoehrmann
* bugzi...@jessica.w3.org wrote: The section Worker Script Caching uses the term MAY NOT, which is not defined in RFC 2119. I'm assuming this is intended to be MUST NOT or maybe SHOULD NOT. If an agent MAY $x then it also MAY not $x. It is possible that the author meant must not or should not in

Re: [Bug 24823] New: [ServiceWorker]: MAY NOT is not defined in RFC 2119

2014-02-26 Thread Brian Kardell
On Feb 26, 2014 1:01 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann derhoe...@gmx.net wrote: * bugzi...@jessica.w3.org wrote: The section Worker Script Caching uses the term MAY NOT, which is not defined in RFC 2119. I'm assuming this is intended to be MUST NOT or maybe SHOULD NOT. If an agent MAY $x then it also

Indexed DB: Opening connections, versions, and priority

2014-02-26 Thread Joshua Bell
While looking at a Chrome bug [1], I reviewed the Indexed DB draft, section 3.3.1 [2] Opening a database: These steps are not run for any other connections with the same origin and name but with a higher version And the note: This means that if two databases with the same name and origin, but

Re: [admin] Should WebApps' HTML Templates spec be published as a WG Note?

2014-02-26 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
Sounds great to me. On Feb 26, 2014, at 6:43 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: Hi Robin, Dimitri, All, Since HTML Templates is now part of HTML5, to help avoid confusion, I think WebApps' last TR of the spec ([html-templates]) should be replaced with a WG Note that clearly

Re: [admin] Should WebApps' HTML Templates spec be published as a WG Note?

2014-02-26 Thread Rafael Weinstein
No objections. It may be useful to mention in the note that the Template spec was merged to HTML (as opposed to simply becoming a concern of HTML, which might raise the question did HTML do something different than what this spec used to say?). On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Ryosuke Niwa

Re: [admin] Should WebApps' HTML Templates spec be published as a WG Note?

2014-02-26 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 2/26/14 3:44 PM, ext Rafael Weinstein wrote: It may be useful to mention in the note that the Template spec was merged to HTML (as opposed to simply becoming a concern of HTML, which might raise the question did HTML do something different than what this spec used to say?). Yes, I agree

Re: [admin] Should WebApps' HTML Templates spec be published as a WG Note?

2014-02-26 Thread Charles McCathie Nevile
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 21:47:19 +0100, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: On 2/26/14 3:44 PM, ext Rafael Weinstein wrote: It may be useful to mention in the note that the Template spec was merged to HTML (as opposed to simply becoming a concern of HTML, which might raise the