On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2014, David Dailey wrote:
The XMLHttpRequest
http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/#xmlhttprequest object was
initially defined as part of the WHATWG's HTML effort. (Long after
Microsoft shipped an
On Saturday, March 29, 2014 7:56 PM
Ian Hickson wrote
1. Long after Microsoft had shipped a related implementation, the
XMLHttpRequest http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/#xmlhttprequest
object was defined as part of the WHATWG's HTML effort
This is correct.
2.The XMLHttpRequest
On Sun, 30 Mar 2014, Jungkee Song wrote:
I presume the author originally put the part rather informatively. I
made it a single sentence as clarified here:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/default/xhr-1/Overview.html#specification-history
Oh, man, please don't fork this further!
The
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 2:44 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2014, Jungkee Song wrote:
I presume the author originally put the part rather informatively. I
made it a single sentence as clarified here:
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014, Jungkee Song wrote:
I really would rather the W3C stopped causing all this confusion with
all these forks of WHATWG specs. It's harming the Web.
This snapshot is not to develop the features in its own way but to
provide the work for the implementors to test and
3.1.7 Transaction
enum IDBTransactionMode {
readonly,
readwrite,
versionchange
};
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
Thanks,
Zhiqiang
