RE: [eventsource] ACTION-742: Re sse test results, followup on the timeouts with the 2 test facilitators (Web Applications Working Group)

2014-11-13 Thread Zhang, Zhiqiang
Hi Art, Sorry for missing this mail thus so late response. From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 23:26 Would you please take a close look at following TIMEOUT failures: 1. eventsource/dedicated-worker/eventsource-constructor-non-same-

Re: [eventsource] ACTION-742: Re sse test results, followup on the timeouts with the 2 test facilitators (Web Applications Working Group)

2014-11-13 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Zhang, Zhiqiang zhiqiang.zh...@intel.com wrote: We may need to re-evaluate the tests, however, because the latest editor draft has removed this statement in the CR: [[ This constructor must be visible when the script's global object is either a Window

Re: [eventsource] ACTION-742: Re sse test results, followup on the timeouts with the 2 test facilitators (Web Applications Working Group)

2014-11-13 Thread Simon Pieters
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 10:14:38 +0100, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote: On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Zhang, Zhiqiang zhiqiang.zh...@intel.com wrote: We may need to re-evaluate the tests, however, because the latest editor draft has removed this statement in the CR: [[ This

[WebSocket API]: Missing Open() method

2014-11-13 Thread Axel Dahmen
How does the specification guarantee that the onopen event will be fired? There is no Open() method definition in the interface. Using a local server during development there won't necessarily be any delay in opening the connection, so that when defining an onopen() handler the readyState

Re: [WebSocket API]: Missing Open() method

2014-11-13 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Axel Dahmen bril...@hotmail.com wrote: ... or did I miss that point in the spec? Yes, the event is dispatched from a task. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/

Re: [eventsource] ACTION-742: Re sse test results, followup on the timeouts with the 2 test facilitators (Web Applications Working Group)

2014-11-13 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 11/13/14 4:34 AM, Simon Pieters wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 10:14:38 +0100, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote: On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Zhang, Zhiqiang zhiqiang.zh...@intel.com wrote: We may need to re-evaluate the tests, however, because the latest editor draft has removed

Re: [eventsource] ACTION-742: Re sse test results, followup on the timeouts with the 2 test facilitators (Web Applications Working Group)

2014-11-13 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: So are you guys saying the deletion of the above requirement in the ED means that all of the tests in and are no longer needed? No, we are saying that the requirement is redundant with the IDL [Exposed] annotation that

[Bug 25251] Transaction ordering for readonly transactions

2014-11-13 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25251 Joshua Bell jsb...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED