https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27418 Bug ID: 27418 Summary: [Shadow]: Need to define what .styleSheets actually does on a shadow root Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS:
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27420 Bug ID: 27420 Summary: [Custom]: need a hook for transfering data while cloning elements Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Windows
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24338 Arun a...@mozilla.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27420 Adam Klein ad...@chromium.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED
From: Rui Prior [mailto:rpr...@dcc.fc.up.pt] IMO, exposing such degree of (low level) control should be avoided. I disagree on principle :). If we want true webapps we need to not be afraid to give them capabilities (like POSTing data to S3) that native apps have. In cases where the size of
From: Rui Prior [mailto:rpr...@dcc.fc.up.pt] If you absolutely need to stream content whose length is unknown beforehand to a server not supporting ckunked encoding, construct your web service so that it supports multiple POSTs (or whatever), one per piece of data to upload.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Domenic Denicola d...@domenic.me wrote: From: annevankeste...@gmail.com [mailto:annevankeste...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Anne van Kesteren On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Takeshi Yoshino tyosh...@google.com wrote: How about padding the remaining bytes