(bcc: public-webapps@)
Hi,
I would like to standardize the Apple's proprietary autocapitalize
attribute. This attribute is widely used and it would probably benefit
the platform to have a broader support for it. The implementation cost
should be fairly low while it can be very beneficial for the
I'd like to propose that the template tag have a namespace= attribute
that allows the user to specify namespaces such as
http://www.w3.org/2000/svg;, so that the document fragment that comes from
`.content` is created properly.
e.g.:
template id=my-svg-template
On 12/03/2015 11:07 , Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Benjamin Lesh bl...@netflix.com wrote:
What are your thoughts on this idea?
I think it would be more natural (HTML-parser-wise) if we
special-cased SVG elements, similar to how e.g. table elements are
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Robin Berjon ro...@w3.org wrote:
On 12/03/2015 11:07 , Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Benjamin Lesh bl...@netflix.com wrote:
What are your thoughts on this idea?
I think it would be more natural (HTML-parser-wise) if we
Hi All,
This CfC (original thread is [1]) is now moving forward and on March 17
there will be two publications:
1. /UI Events (Keyboard Extension)/; W3C Working Group Note; (draft is
http://jay.w3.org/~plehegar/uievents-ext.html).
2. /UI Events Specification (formerly DOM Level 3 Events)/;
FWIW: Currently, template tags nested in svg are SVGElement, and not
HTMLTemplate Element. You also need to hide the SVG container or it will be
rendered.
On Mar 12, 2015 8:18 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@apple.com wrote:
By
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@apple.com wrote:
By special casing, do you mean to recognize SVG element names?
Yeah, not really sure there's another way of doing it. (You can of
course put things within svg, but then you could also put tbody in
table...)
I'd prefer
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Adam Klein ad...@chromium.org wrote:
For clarity, is this significantly different from the below (which works
today)?
template id=tmpl
svg
circle .../
/svg
/template
Clearly there's an extra step here, in that accessing the SVG elements
requires
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Adam Klein ad...@chromium.org wrote:
For clarity, is this significantly different from the below (which works
today)?
template id=tmpl
svg
circle .../
/svg
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Adam Klein ad...@chromium.org wrote:
Is your thinking that adding special-casing for SVG-looking (as in, tag
names appearing in the list of SVG tags but not in the list of HTML tags)
inside template has fewer compat risks than a wholesale change of the HTML
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Benjamin Lesh bl...@netflix.com wrote:
I'd like to propose that the template tag have a namespace= attribute
that allows the user to specify namespaces such as
http://www.w3.org/2000/svg;, so that the document fragment that comes
from `.content` is created
I would also prefer to enable this to work without any extra annotation. So
much of the rest of how SVG/MathML are handled in HTML is seamless by design.
From: ad...@google.com [mailto:ad...@google.com] On Behalf Of Adam Klein
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 11:17 AM
To: Benjamin Lesh
Cc: WebApps
Dimitri et al.,
Has the idea of loading/parsing a Shadow DOM directly from a URL been
discussed already? (e.g., a sort-of micro-import or an import that parses its
document directly into the ShadowRoot container?) I'm curious to know if
there's some obvious flaw that I'm missing.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Benjamin Lesh bl...@netflix.com wrote:
What are your thoughts on this idea?
I think it would be more natural (HTML-parser-wise) if we
special-cased SVG elements, similar to how e.g. table elements are
special-cased today. A lot of template-parsing logic is set up
So much of the rest of how SVG/MathML are handled in HTML is seamless by
design. For my part, I disagree slightly with this statement. If you just
drop a circle tag in a div, you're going to get an HTMLUnknownElement.
This is by design and to spec, of course. But it unfortunately means you
can't
Yep. Elliott (cc'd) had a proposal like this a while back. It was coolly
received (can't remember the details).
:DG
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Travis Leithead
travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote:
Dimitri et al.,
Has the idea of loading/parsing a Shadow DOM directly from a URL
16 matches
Mail list logo
