Re: I18N comments on Manifest for Web applications

2015-03-24 Thread Richard Ishida
is it possible to send mail to www-internatio...@w3.org each time someone adds somethign to the github issue? (this is the list where we track and discuss issues). if so, i see no real difference between using github or bugzilla – our process is designed to cope with both bugzilla and email

Re: [XHR] UTF-16 - do content sniffing or not?

2015-03-24 Thread Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
Which MIME type did you use in the response? BOM sniffing in XML is non-normative IIRC. For other types, see below. It's text/plain - seems I definitely need one test with an XML response too.. and one with JSON. [[ If charset is null, set charset to utf-8. Return the result of running

Re: I18N comments on Manifest for Web applications

2015-03-24 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
As far as I know, you can watch individual issues with GitHub, so you could create a GitHub account with that email address and then watch relevant issues. Also it would mean that an email would be sent if someone mentioned the user (ie @www-international) in any issue Kenneth On Tue, Mar 24,

Re: CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28

2015-03-24 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 3/24/15 3:52 PM, Sigbjorn Finne wrote: Den 3/24/2015 20:37, Arthur Barstow skreiv: On 3/21/15 1:27 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Arthur Barstowart.bars...@gmail.com wrote: 2.http://www.w3c-test.org/webmessaging/without-ports/025.html; this test failure (which

Re: I18N comments on Manifest for Web applications

2015-03-24 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 3/24/15 10:21 AM, Richard Ishida wrote: is it possible to send mail to www-internatio...@w3.org each time someone adds somethign to the github issue? (this is the list where we track and discuss issues). if so, i see no real difference between using github or bugzilla – our process is

Re: CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28

2015-03-24 Thread Sigbjorn Finne
Den 3/24/2015 20:37, Arthur Barstow skreiv: On 3/21/15 1:27 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Arthur Barstowart.bars...@gmail.com wrote: 2.http://www.w3c-test.org/webmessaging/without-ports/025.html; this test failure (which passes on IE) is considered an