Rigo, Wendy, Jeff - I don't think it is appropriate to use WebApps'
public-webapps list regarding Web Components vs Extract Widget patent
[1]. What list should be used?
(FYI, Aymeric Vitte's original disclosure was forwarded to the list [1],
and Aymeric's followups are [2] and [3]).
That sounds good to me (working the UI challenges for IME together with
grammar/spell checking). Is this a direction the current IME spec could
take--possibly with a big refactor to consider dropping the ClientRect
exposure--or would it be better to publish as Note the current approach and
Please see https://gist.github.com/Ayms/64dfd60ddae05aeaff4e
This is a brief code comparison between the extract widget projects from
the patent and the Polymer project.
Since we knew exactly what we had to look for, we found it, the
conclusion is:
Not seeing obvious similitudes between the
Hi Art, and all,
I believe we have enough review on the current editor's draft to publish
directly a CR. We don't need to do the extra WD step. If implementors or others
have additional comments, they can do so during the CR phase. So I propose that
we publish a CR directly.
Thanks.
—