Re: RfC: Service Workers

2015-09-21 Thread Arthur Barstow
Please use the Version 1 branch for this review: On 9/21/15 7:27 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: [ Bcc: TAG (www-tag), WebAppSec WG (public-webapsec), Mobile IG (public-web-mobile), W3C Chairs (chairs), Review Announce list

Re: Normative references to Workers.

2015-09-21 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 9/21/15 5:54 AM, Ms2ger wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/21/2015 11:05 AM, Xiaoqian Wu wrote: If it helps, I’d like to prepare a Workers draft to revise the previous CR, and schedule the publication ASAP (hopefully 22 Sep). The goal is to synchronise with the

Re: Normative references to Workers.

2015-09-21 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > On 9/21/15 5:54 AM, Ms2ger wrote: >> Why? > > I think the rationale was mentioned in > . Ms2ger made a valid point. Workers is actively being

RfC: Service Workers

2015-09-21 Thread Arthur Barstow
[ Bcc: TAG (www-tag), WebAppSec WG (public-webapsec), Mobile IG (public-web-mobile), W3C Chairs (chairs), Review Announce list (public-review-announce), Geolocation WG (public-geolocation) ] The Editors and active contributors of Service Workers intend to publish a Candidate Recommendation

Re: Normative references to Workers.

2015-09-21 Thread Ms2ger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/21/2015 11:05 AM, Xiaoqian Wu wrote: > If it helps, I’d like to prepare a Workers draft to revise the > previous CR, and schedule the publication ASAP (hopefully 22 Sep). > The goal is to synchronise with the upstream, to document the >

Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced?

2015-09-21 Thread Henri Manson
I created a prototype of this idea on github: https://github.com/hfmanson/webcomponentsjs/blob/xml-namespace/README.md by forking the original webcomponents.js project. It contains a working example of this concept. Below the content of the README.md file: This fork of webcomponents.js enhances

Re: Normative references to Workers.

2015-09-21 Thread Xiaoqian Wu
> On 22 Sep, 2015, at 1:35 am, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> On 9/21/15 5:54 AM, Ms2ger wrote: >>> Why? >> >> I think the rationale was mentioned in >>

RE: Normative references to Workers.

2015-09-21 Thread Domenic Denicola
From: Xiaoqian Wu [mailto:xiaoq...@w3.org] > If the spec is still changing frequently, indeed it isn't a good idea to > publish another CR… but the WebApps WG needs to clearly tell the community > that the 2012 CR should be considered obsolete. > > I’d suggest that we publish a WD for

Re: Normative references to Workers.

2015-09-21 Thread Xiaoqian Wu
> On 16 Sep, 2015, at 8:17 pm, Arthur Barstow wrote: > > On 9/16/15 4:47 AM, Mike West wrote: >> Note that this is an issue that's going to come up for a number of WebAppSec >> specs (see >> https://w3c.github.io/webappsec/specs/powerfulfeatures/#issue-a30f61b8 >>