Yes, sorry.
<>
That's for implementors such as yourself to work through, I had assumed.
I just went over the Readme from the perspective of an IDB user. Here is
some potentially very naive feedback but i it s so obvious I can't help but
state it:
Instead of having .promise to appended to the
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Marc Fawzi wrote:
> Have you looked at ES7 async/await? I find that pattern makes both simple
> as well as very complex (even dynamic) async coordination much easier to
> deal with than Promise API. I mean from a developer perspective.
>
>
<<
Instead of having .promise to appended to the IDB methods as in
`store.openCursor(query).promise` why couldn't you configure the IDB API to
be in Promise returning mode and in that case openCursor(query) would
return a Promise.
>>
I meant user configurable, maybe as a global config.
On Mon,
Have you looked at ES7 async/await? I find that pattern makes both simple as
well as very complex (even dynamic) async coordination much easier to deal with
than Promise API. I mean from a developer perspective.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 28, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Joshua Bell
One of the top requests[1] we've received for future iterations of Indexed
DB is integration with ES Promises. While this initially seems
straightforward ("aren't requests just promises?") the devil is in the
details - events vs. microtasks, exceptions vs. rejections, automatic
commits, etc.
On 28/09/15 22:14, Marc Fawzi wrote:
> <<
> Instead of having .promise to appended to the IDB methods as
> in `store.openCursor(query).promise` why couldn't you configure the IDB
> API to be in Promise returning mode and in that case openCursor(query)
> would return a Promise.
>>>
>
> I meant
How about using ES7 decorators, like so:
@idb_promise
function () {
//some code that uses the IDB API in Promise based way
}
and it would add .promise to the IDB APIs
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 1:26 PM, David Rajchenbach-Teller <
dtel...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On 28/09/15 22:14, Marc Fawzi
I’ve been maintaining an IDB wrapper using Promises for a few years now[1].
Some things I’ve learnt are:
· Sharing transactions are a pain, but can be beneficial
· Cursors would lead to a nicer implementation on generators
· Async looks like a nicer abstraction on top
Hi,
Attending the recent meeting for shadow DOM styling [1] convinced me to join
CSS WG, and further that we need a joint meeting between CSS WG and WebApps WG
on this topic during TPAC to iron out the details.
Can we have a joint meeting (of one or two hours) on Monday (10/26) or Tuesday