04 PM, Austin William Wright wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Benjamin Lesh wrote:
>
>> For my part, I disagree slightly with this statement. If you just drop a
>> tag in a , you're going to get an HTMLUnknownElement. This is
>> by design and to spec,
the namespaces merged. At the very least, it would immediately
provide authors something they could polyfill to solve this issue.
On Mar 13, 2015 1:16 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:07 AM, Anne van Kesteren
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:32 AM,
> So much of the rest of how SVG/MathML are handled in HTML is seamless by
design. For my part, I disagree slightly with this statement. If you just
drop a tag in a , you're going to get an HTMLUnknownElement.
This is by design and to spec, of course. But it unfortunately means you
can't clone() t
FWIW: Currently, template tags nested in svg are SVGElement, and not
HTMLTemplate Element. You also need to hide the SVG container or it will be
rendered.
On Mar 12, 2015 8:18 AM, "Anne van Kesteren" wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> > By special casing, do you mean
I'd like to propose that the tag have a namespace="" attribute
that allows the user to specify namespaces such as "
http://www.w3.org/2000/svg";, so that the document fragment that comes from
`.content` is created properly.
e.g.:
http://www.w3.org/2000/svg>
Likewise, should work properly
