Minutes from Components face to face

Hi folks, Thanks to PLH (Who was a bit quicker than me to publish the work) there are combined minutes of nearly everything from the webapps face to face meeting at http://www.w3.org/2015/07/21-webapps-minutes.html Unfortunately, about the only things that got missed were the action items

Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types

On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 08:24:17 -0400, Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen hst...@mozilla.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Chaals McCathie Nevile cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote: I'm just thinking out loud here, but this problem is similar to one already faced by email clients, especially

Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types

I'm just thinking out loud here, but this problem is similar to one already faced by email clients, especially those which are web-based... On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 15:03:40 -0400, Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen hst...@mozilla.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Daniel Cheng

[Web Components] proposing a f2f...

Hi, it would be good to have a face to face meeting, and wrap up loose ends. At the TPAC meeting times suggested were December and late January. If people want to do it soon, we should probably aim for December, which means finding a date and host. The assumption is that we will be meeting

[web components] proposed meetings: 15 dec / 29 jan

Hi folks, in the poll we ran, there were only about 10 responses, and the preference split was pretty even. I also forgot to make a place where people could provide their name :( Our proposal is to look for a host on 15 December on the West Coast, for a meeting primarily focused on

No meeting in december Re: [web components] proposed meetings: 15 dec / 29 jan

OK, just to formally close the loop we will not have a meeting in December. cheers On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 05:12:55 +0100, Hayato Ito wrote: Thank you, Ryosuke. I'm fine not to have a meeting in Dec. Let me add a link to GitHub issue(s) for each item: 1. Clarify focus

29 Jan? Re: [web components] proposed meetings: 15 dec / 29 jan

On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:32:06 +0100, Chaals McCathie Nevile <cha...@yandex-team.ru> wrote: https://github.com/w3c/WebPlatformWG/blob/gh-pages/meetings/15decWC.md https://github.com/w3c/WebPlatformWG/blob/gh-pages/meetings/16janWC.md Offers of hosting will be very gratefully received. We need

Re: [pointerlock] Oct 2015 Pointer Lock Status

On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 05:57:06 +0900, Vincent Scheib wrote: Pointer lock reached Candidate Recommendation in Dec 2013. [CR] Implementation status: [Looks like enough that if the implementations work - i.e. do the same things - we are ready] Testharness tests are not

Re: [pointerlock] Oct 2015 Pointer Lock Status

On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 05:08:10 +0900, Vincent Scheib <sch...@google.com> wrote: On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 3:42 AM, Chaals McCathie Nevile < cha...@yandex-team.ru> wrote: Yes. You are *not* required to use testharness tests. While it would be good to get the automation of stuff like

Re: [Web Components] proposing a f2f...

minute, hopefully tomorrow. Feel free to add to the thread in the meantime. cheers From: "Takayoshi Kochi (河内 隆仁)" <ko...@google.com> Sent: Oct 30, 2015 2:52 PM To: Ryosuke Niwa Cc: Cynthia Shelly; Chris Wilson; Travis Leithead; Dimitri Glazkov; Olli Pettay; Chaals McCathie Nev

Vote: f2f Meeting(s) for components

Hi, I set up a ballot: https://modernballots.com/elections/agkedja2/vote/ There are a few kinds of option - single day or two, two days split or co-located, and spread across what seemed the most easily available dates - 15/16 december, 24/5 and 29/30 jan. You can write in another option

Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

TL;DR: It's worth pursuing, but chat in WICG first to get a proposal that Web Platform WG will formally take up. On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:26:11 +0200, Daniel Buchner wrote: After publishing the post, Google has reached out and we’ve been discussing options for solving

Re: Making progress with items in Web Platform Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

Offlist. On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 19:36:54 +0200, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren@gmail.com> wrote: On 2015-10-17 17:58, Chaals McCathie Nevile wrote: Regarding App-to-App interaction I'm personally mainly into the Web-to-Native variant. As I already pointed out to Daniel, this

Making progress with items in Web Platform Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 16:19:17 +0200, Anders Rundgren wrote: On 2015-10-16 18:00, Aymeric Vitte wrote: Well, since I was on the list, I took the liberty of commenting a bit on this. Please work on being more civil and constructive when you do. (Aymeric,

Repos and specs Re: [admin] Web Platform WG is the new WebApps

On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 18:48:31 +0200, Johannes Wilm wrote: Hey, thanks for the info. As I understand it, this has no practical impact on the editing taskforce and these are more suggestions for future task forces, right? That is how I understand it too. As for

Re: Proposal: CSS WG / WebApps Joint Meeting for Shadow DOM Styling

I added a note (as a question) to the meeting wiki page: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/October2015Meeting cheers On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:12:16 +0500, John Daggett wrote: Late Tuesday afternoon would be a good fit for me. On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Ryosuke

Apple will host Re: Custom Elements meeting will be 25th Jan (not 29th)

On Mon, 07 Dec 2015 13:39:25 +1000, Chaals McCathie Nevile <cha...@yandex-team.ru> wrote: we are trying to shift the date of the Custom Elements meeting to *25* Jan, from the previously proposed date of 29th. We are currently looking for a host in the Bay area - offers grat

Custom Elements meeting will be 25th Jan (not 29th)

Dear all, we are trying to shift the date of the Custom Elements meeting to *25* Jan, from the previously proposed date of 29th. We are currently looking for a host in the Bay area - offers gratefully received. If you plan to attend, please add your name to the meeting page:

Re: time at TPAC other than Wednesday?

On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 23:20:27 +0300, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: On Jan 8, 2016, at 7:12 PM, Johannes Wilm wrote: On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 3:49 AM, Grisha Lyukshin wrote: Hello Johannes, I was the one to organize the meeting. To

Meeting date, january

Hi, it appears that there are some people may not be able to attend a meeting on the 29th - although Apple has generously offered to host that day. Is there anyone who would only be able to attend if we moved the meeting to the 25th? Conversely, would that shift cause problems for anyone

Re: Meeting date, january

On Tue, 01 Dec 2015 00:15:23 +1000, Léonie Watson <lwat...@paciellogroup.com> wrote: From: Chaals McCathie Nevile [mailto:cha...@yandex-team.ru] Sent: 26 November 2015 01:55 it appears that there are some people may not be able to attend a meeting on the 29th - although App

Re: Self-introduction from Wanming Lin

Welcome Wanming! On Tue, 31 May 2016 09:46:15 +0200, Lin, Wanming wrote: Hello WP, My name is Wanming Lin, many thanks Wayne for inviting me join in WP WG. I work for Intel OTC Web QA team which focuses on testing work for advanced Web technologies especially for

[Service Workers] meeting july/august?

Hi folks, at the last meeting people suggested another meeting in July/August. Should we be trying to schedule one? The Editing folks are meeting in California 29 July. Something just before that would be very convenient for *me*. Others of course may have unaccountably different

Re: CFC: Request to move HTML5.1 to Candidate Recommendation (CR)

On Thu, 02 Jun 2016 14:48:10 +0200, Léonie Watson wrote: Hello WP, This is a call for consensus to request that W3C publish the current HTML Working Draft (WD) as a Candidate Recommendation (CR). +1 Please do. chaals - Yandex hat on, chair hat off -- Charles McCathie Nevile

Re: Request to move HTML5.1 to Candidate Recommendation (CR)

On Thu, 02 Jun 2016 18:14:38 +0200, wrote: Can we please kindly stop the +1s spam? It greatly diminishes the value of this mailing list. For the purpose of progressing a spec, the only thing that matters is objections. Hi Marcos, If there are no objections, then the

Re: CFC: Republish Pointer Lock as CR

On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:33:30 +0200, Vincent Scheib wrote: An accessibility review and handling of this [accessibility issue #1] are still needed and will likely cause a CR cycle. To avoid unnecessary work I propose CR to be deferred until that work is complete.

Remote participation Re: Apple will host Re: Custom Elements meeting will be 25th Jan (not 29th)

On Wed, 06 Jan 2016 11:59:55 +0100, Takayoshi Kochi (河内 隆仁) wrote: On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > On Jan 6, 2016, at 12:05 AM, Takayoshi Kochi (河内 隆仁) > > Is there any option to attend this remotely (telcon or

Re: [clipboard] Sanitizing HTML content for security/privacy on copy or paste?

On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 12:39:33 +0100, Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen wrote: Hi, some discussion of how browsers can try to safeguard security/privacy while copying/pasting HTML got tangled into the "remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types" thread [1]. I think it

[service worker] f2f meeting notes, next meeting details

Hi folks, for those who are wondering, the last face to face meeting created an agenda, as a github issue: https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/806 and then just updated issues as they went. The relevant sisues are linked from teh agenda, so you can look for updates from

TPAC 2016 - meetings

Dear all, as you probably know, the W3C will hold its Technical Plenary meeting this year in Lisbon, September 19-23. Rather than meet for several days in plenary, with an hour or two for any given topic we are considering an approach that gives more focused time to a few important areas

Art steps down - thank you for everything

Hi folks, as you may have noticed, Art has resigned as a co-chair of the Web Platform group. He began chairing the Web Application Formats group about a decade ago, became the leading co-chair when it merged with Web APIs to become the Web Apps working group, and was instrumental in making

Service Workers meeting, 11-12 April in Seattle

Hi all, there will be a meeting to work on Service Workers, scheduled for 11-12 April. Microsoft have kindly agreed to host it in Seattle (or thereabouts). An initial webpage for the meeting is in our github repo: https://github.com/w3c/WebPlatformWG/blob/gh-pages/meetings/11-12aprSW.md

Meeting at TPAC - need to plan space.

Dear all, as you probably know, the W3C will hold its Technical Plenary meeting this year in Lisbon, September 19-23. Rather than meet for several days in plenary, with an hour or two for any given topic we are considering an approach that gives more focused time to a few important areas

Re: HTML5's Offline-first Council of Trent

The chairs and various individuals requested that Mr Maher use a tone acceptable in this group. This email once again fails to meet the minimum standards of politeness and constructive behaviour for this group. Mr Maher has been removed from the mailing list. for the chairs chaals On

Re: Meeting for selection API at TPAC?

On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:42:07 +0100, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: Thanks for the rely. Léonie & Chaals, could we allocate a time slot to discuss selection? Sure. Any preferences for minimising clashes? How long do you think you need? cheers Chaals On Mar 15, 2016, at 8:33 PM,

Re: Telecon / meeting on first week of April for Web Components

On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:24:59 +0200, Jan Miksovsky wrote: It sounds like there’s general interest in making this happen, so I went ahead and set up a Doodle poll for this: http://doodle.com/poll/z7qvrafbxw4zyit9. (Chaals: I just noticed you offered to do that as

Re: [service worker] f2f meeting notes, next meeting details

On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 07:01:14 +0200, Matt Falkenhagen <fal...@chromium.org> wrote: 2016-02-10 0:21 GMT+09:00 Chaals McCathie Nevile <cha...@yandex-team.ru>: There will be another face to face meeting to discuss service workers, hosted by Microsoft in Seattle or Redmond, on 11-12

[Web Components] Minutes - Shadow DOM teleconf April 5

Available at https://www.w3.org/2016/04/05-webapps-minutes.html or as text below. Thanks to Jan Miksovsky for logistics, and in particular for scribing! [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - Web Components Teleconference 05

Re: HTML editors meeting

Dear Ms2ger, On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 09:56:58 +0100, Ms2ger wrote: Hi Léonie, Please don't send spam about your HTML fork to this mailing list; we were promised the WG merge would not cause our time to be wasted with that crap. This message fails to meet the minimum

Re: Telecon / meeting on first week of April for Web Components

On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 04:17:07 +0100, Hayato Ito wrote: Either option is okay to me. I'll attend the meeting from Tokyo. I'll attend from Europe. Is there a preferred day, and how long do you anticipate this being? Should we be trying to set up a day or so face to face

TPAC schedule proposal

Hi, at this stage we're trying to shuffle everything to fit, and of course it doesn't. The chairs' current proposal is to request a room for all 4 days, with the following schedule: Monday: Web Components Tuesday: Editing and Selection Thursday: Service Workers Friday: HTML, Directory

Re: Telecon / meeting on first week of April for Web Components

On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 13:45:16 +0200, Chaals McCathie Nevile <cha...@yandex-team.ru> wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:24:59 +0200, Jan Miksovsky <jan@component.kitchen> wrote: It sounds like there’s general interest in making this happen, so I went ahead and set up a

Re: CFC: Publish as W3C Notes

On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 19:05:52 +0100, Léonie Watson wrote: At the AC meeting in March 2016 the WP co-chairs indicated that the following two specifications would benefit from further incubation before continuing along the Recommendation track: Quota Management API [1] Input Method

About the packaging spec Re: CFC

Hi Marcos, On Wed, 25 May 2016 00:52:07 +0100, wrote: On 25 May 2016, at 3:54 AM, Léonie Watson wrote: At the AC meeting in March 2016 the WP co-chairs indicated that the Packaging on the Web specification [1] would benefit from further incubation

Draft recharter proposal

Hi folks, our charter expires at the end of September. I've produced a draft version of a new charter, for people to comment on: http://w3c.github.io/charter-html/group-charter.html Feel free to raise comments as issues: https://github.com/w3c/charter-html/issues/new As per the change

Type correction Re: New editors for Clipboard API spec

On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 02:16:17 +0200, Chaals McCathie Nevile <cha...@yandex-team.ru> wrote: Hi, I'm happy to announce Grisha *Lyukshin*. Sorry Grisha and Gary Kačmarčik as the new editors of the Clipboard API specification, and to thank them for volunteering, cheers -- C

Fwd: Minutes / results of editing meeting

FYI --- Forwarded message --- From: "Chaals McCathie Nevile" <cha...@yandex-team.ru> To: "public-editing...@w3.org" <public-editing...@w3.org> Cc: Subject: Minutes / results of meeting Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 23:51:18 +0200 Hi folks, Detailed minutes are

New editors for Clipboard API spec

Hi, I'm happy to announce Grisha Lyushkin and Gary Kačmarčik as the new editors of the Clipboard API specification, and to thank them for volunteering, as well as Hallvord for the work he put into it until now. cheers -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex

Re: Draft recharter proposal

On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 18:29:44 +0200, Olli Pettay <o...@pettay.fi> wrote: On 07/29/2016 06:13 PM, Chaals McCathie Nevile wrote: Hi folks, our charter expires at the end of September. I've produced a draft version of a new charter, for people to comment on: http://w3c.github.io/charte

Re: Meeting between Web platform and ARIA at TPAC

Hi Rich Cc+ Adrian - co-chair of the WG On Thu, 04 Aug 2016 16:00:18 +0200, Rich Schwerdtfeger wrote: Leonie, Charles, I would like to request a 90 minute meeting on Friday at TPAC. We generally don't have more than 60 minutes for meeting sessions. You're

Re: Call for Consensus: Publish HTML 5.2 FPWD?

On Tue, 05 Jul 2016 16:15:32 +0200, Chaals McCathie Nevile <cha...@yandex-team.ru> wrote: This is a call for consensus on the proposition: Publish the current editors' draft of HTML 5.2 - https://w3c.github.io/html/ - as a First Public Working Draft. With a positive re

Review request: Wake Lock API

Hello all, The Device & Sensors Working Group has asked us to review the Wake Lock API, on it way to Candidate Recommendation status: https://www.w3.org/TR/wake-lock/ Their specific question is whether the API "fits" with the rest of the Web Platform. Please provide feedback before the end of

Thank you Hallvord (looking for Clipboard API editor…)

Dear all, part of this mail is to thank Hallvord Steen for his efforts in this group over a number of years. As a result of changed employment he is stepping down as a member and in particular as editor of the Clipboard APIs specification, which is just one part of the contribution he has

Re: Quick update on WebIDL "Level 1"

On Fri, 08 Jul 2016 22:21:10 +0200, Domenic Denicola wrote: From: Travis Leithead [mailto:travis.leith...@microsoft.com] The purpose of the “Level 1” document is to serve as a stable reference for W3C specs that link to WebIDL. It contains a subset of the WebIDL syntax

Call for Consensus: Publish HTML 5.2 FPWD?

This is a call for consensus on the proposition: Publish the current editors' draft of HTML 5.2 - https://w3c.github.io/html/ - as a First Public Working Draft. Silence will be considered assent, but positive responses are preferred. In an effort to find a smoother way to assess consensus,