Re: Normative references to Workers.

2015-09-15 Thread Daniel Veditz
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > ​there's nothing wrong with reffing WHATWG specs. It will not delay > ​ or hamper​ > > publication or Rec-track advancement, despite the > ​ occasional misinformed​ > > complaint from someone not aware of the > ​ ​

Re: [eventsource] Is Server-Sent Events ready for LC? ; deadline July 1

2011-07-05 Thread Daniel Veditz
FWIW I'm going to push for the Mozilla implementation to dispatch only when an event is clearly terminated with a blank line (I filed the bug). If EOF is encountered w/out a blank line it should be considered an incomplete/corrupted event. The fix for the spec would be to drop the line Once

Re: Publishing From-Origin Proposal as FPWD

2011-06-30 Thread Daniel Veditz
On 6/30/11 9:31 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: On Jun 30, 2011, at 7:22 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: (Added public-web-security because of the potential for doing this in CSP instead. Though that would require a slight change of scope for CSP, which I'm not sure is actually desirable.) I

Re: Cross-Origin Resource Embedding Restrictions

2011-03-01 Thread Daniel Veditz
On 3/1/11 12:26 AM, Adam Barth wrote: From-Origin is closely related to one of the proposed CSP features, namely frame-ancestors, which also controls how the given resource can be embedded in other documents: Also similar to X-Frame-Options; I'd hate to end up with all three mechanisms. I'd be