Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution

2015-04-22 Thread Erik Bryn
FWIW, we're working to implement what we call named blocks in Ember.js and believe this proposal aligns very closely to what our users have been asking us to build for them. - Erik On Wednesday, April 22, 2015, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: This is literally reinventing Selectors

Re: Minimum viable custom elements

2015-02-05 Thread Erik Bryn
Thanks for the mentioning the Ember issue Chris :) I've filed it here: On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:13 AM, Chris Bateman wrote: As an example I made a simple input-based Custom Element which prevents alphabetic input, and dropped it

Re: Separating Transclusion Mechanisms for Inheritance and Data Binding

2014-04-22 Thread Erik Bryn
*claps for sharing JSBin* Would love to see more of this on public-webapps when possible :) On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.orgwrote: BTW, here's a jsbin that implements yield/transclude using existing Shadow DOM plumbing:

Decoupling style scoped from Shadow DOM

2014-02-20 Thread Erik Bryn
Hi everyone, First time caller, long time listener. From what I understand, the browser vendors seem to be bundling style scoped with the Shadow DOM spec. I'd like to start a discussion around decoupling the two and asking that vendors prioritize shipping style scoped over Shadow DOM as a whole.

Re: [webcomponents] Imperative API for Insertion Points

2014-02-18 Thread Erik Bryn
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Edward O'Connor eocon...@apple.comwrote: I think Ryosuke's content.add/remove are a better base layer than content select. In fact, content select is straightforwardly implementable / explainable on top of MO + content.add/remove, but there are several use