Re: Service worker F2F meeting - 26th Jan - San Francisco

2016-01-04 Thread Ilya Grigorik
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > We have three more seats at this point, allocated on the basis of > first come, first served. > If any are still available, I'd like to reserve one as well :)

Re: Security use cases for packaging

2015-01-29 Thread Ilya Grigorik
Would it be possible to meet the security goals without assuming that the response body is part of the package? See [1] for background on why that's beneficial.. at least for performance side of the story. I'm picturing a package description where each resource has a SRI token, plus a signature to

Re: =[xhr] Expose XMLHttpRequest priority

2014-09-30 Thread Ilya Grigorik - I recently got some good offline feedback on the proposal, need to update it, stay tuned. - related~ish, may be of interest. ig On Tue, Sep

Re: [HTML Imports]: Sync, async, -ish?

2013-11-26 Thread Ilya Grigorik
(way behind, slowly catching up...) On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Daniel Buchner wrote: Steve and I talked at the Chrome Dev Summit today and generated an idea that may align the stars for our async/sync needs: link rel=import elements=x-foo, x-bar / +1. I think this

Re: Beacon API

2013-02-15 Thread Ilya Grigorik
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: Just to be clear. I understand why we'd want this. I'm a) wondering why it'll be successful this time given it has the same characteristics as ping= b) asking about the desired timeframe given the highly likely

Re: Beacon API

2013-02-14 Thread Ilya Grigorik
A lot of the discussion so far focused on the async analytics beacon + unload use case. However, while this is an important case to consider, let's not constrain this proposal to on unload case only. Effectively, what we want is a generic send this request sometime later, I don't care when, where