> On 13 Jun 2016, at 18:11, Léonie Watson wrote:
> Hello WP,
> This CFC passed with many expressions of support. Thank you to everyone who
> responded and gave feedback.
> Léonie on behalf of the WP chairs and team, and HTML editors
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Léonie Watson [mailto:t...@tink.uk]
>> Sent: 02 June 2016 13:48
>> To: 'public-webapps WG'
>> Subject: CFC: Request to move HTML5.1 to Candidate Recommendation (CR)
>> Hello WP,
>> This is a call for consensus to request that W3C publish the current HTML
>> Working Draft (WD) as a Candidate Recommendation (CR). It has been
>> posted to email@example.com as the official email for this WG.
>> Please reply to this thread on firstname.lastname@example.org no later than end of
>> day on 10 June. Positive responses are preferred and encouraged, silence
>> will be considered as assent.
>> The current HTML5.1 WD  improves upon HTML5. It includes updates that
>> make it more reliable, more readable and understandable, and a better
>> match for reality. Substantial changes between HTML5 and HTML5.1 can be
>> found in the spec .
>> When a specification moves to CR it triggers a Call For Exclusions, per
>> 4 of the W3C Patent Policy . No substantive additions can be made to a
>> specification in CR without starting a new Call for Exclusions, so we will
>> HTML5.1 into "feature freeze". It is possible to make editorial updates as
>> necessary, and features marked "At Risk" may be removed if found not to be
>> The following features are considered "at risk". If we cannot identify at
>> two shipping implementations, they will be marked "at risk" in the CR and
>> may be removed from the Proposed Recommendation.
>> keygen element. [issue 43]
>> label as a reassociatable element [issue 109] Fixing requestAnimationFrame
>> to 60Hz, not implementation-defined [issues 159/375/422]
>> registerContentHandler [Issue 233] inputmode attribute of the input
>> element [issue 269] autofill of form elements [issue 372] menu, menuitem
>> and context menus. [issue 373] dialog element [issue 427] Text tracks
>> exposing in-band metadata best practices [Issue 461] datetime and
>> datatime-local states of the input element [Issue 462]
>> Please share implementation details for any of these features on Github.
>> mark other features "at risk", please identify them by 10th June (ideally
>> filing an issue and providing a test case).
>> At the same time we move HTML5.1 into CR, we plan to continue updating
>> the Editor's Draft, and in the next few weeks we expect to post a Call for
>> Consensus to publish it as the First Public Working Draft of HTML5.2, so
>> improving HTML will continue without a pause. It also means that changes
>> that didn't make it into
>> HTML5.1 will not have long to wait before being incorporated into the
>> Léonie on behalf of the WP chairs and team, and HTML editors.
>>  https://www.w3.org/TR/html51/
>>  https://www.w3.org/TR/html51/changes.html#changes
>>  https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Exclusion
>> [issue 43] https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/43
>> [issue 109] https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/109
>> [issues 159/375/422] https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/159 and links
>> [issue 233] https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/233
>> [issue 269] https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/269
>> [issue 372] https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/372
>> [issue 373] https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/373
>> [issue 427] https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/427
>> [Issue 461] https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/461
>> [Issue 462] https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/462
>> @LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem