Re: What I am missing

2014-11-19 Thread Pradeep Kumar
should* require > signed code - in addition to the users consent. > > Michaela > > > > On 11/19/2014 09:09 AM, Pradeep Kumar wrote: > > Even today, browsers ask for permission for geolocation, local storage, > camera etc... How it is different from current scenar

Re: What I am missing

2014-11-19 Thread Pradeep Kumar
Even today, browsers ask for permission for geolocation, local storage, camera etc... How it is different from current scenario? On 19-Nov-2014 8:35 pm, "Michaela Merz" wrote: > > That is relevant and also not so. Because Java applets silently grant > access to a out of sandbox functionality if s

Re: CfC: publish WG Note of UI Events; deadline November 14

2014-11-19 Thread Pradeep Kumar
+1 On 19-Nov-2014 8:07 pm, "Anne van Kesteren" wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Arthur Barstow > wrote: > > Although there appears to be agreement that work on the [uievents] spec > > should stop, the various replies raise sufficient questions that I > consider > > this CfC (as written)

Re: What I am missing

2014-11-19 Thread Pradeep Kumar
How the browsers can be code servers? Could you please explain a little more... On 19-Nov-2014 7:51 pm, "Michaela Merz" wrote: > Thank you Jonas. I was actually thinking about the security model of > FirefoxOS or Android apps. We write powerful "webapps" nowadays. And > with "webapps" I mean regu