New Service Worker Event from GeoLocation

" you know it makes sense? Cheers Richard Maher

Re: [ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745)

Look I %100 acknowledge the problem(s) @martinthomson highlights, and the need to prevent abuse from the black hats. All I’m saying is let’s work the problem rather than simply rocking in the foetal position, or worse, concocting artificial and exaggerated speed-humps on the release path of much

Re: [ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745)

I found a very interesting, and inspiring quote today that I'd like to share with you: - https://twitter.com/jaffathecake Googler. "I want the web to do everything native can, and fast." So can anyone here explain to me how that precludes device/user tracking? Or how HTML5 Web Apps can not be

Re: [geolocation] New Working Group Technical Report - Background GPS

Like the Push API the default must be DO NOT track in the background. If the user chooses the individual APP settings then they can turn it on? On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Richard Maher <mahe...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have no experience with how a W3C standard g

[geolocation] New Working Group Technical Report - Background GPS

s API and microphone access PS. Mozilla is also floundering: -https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1216148https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=784505 Thanks for listening. Cheers Richard Maher

Re: [ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745)

@martinthomson I hate to make this a point of jurisdiction, but I think that this is a discussion that needs to be had in the geolocation working group. I've been careful to avoid any demarcation issues by always involving the Service Worker AND GeoLocation

Re: HTML5's Offline-first Council of Trent

rised that someone owning the implementation will pull out their sword and opt for results over process? On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Anders Rundgren < anders.rundgren@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2016-03-17 06:00, Richard Maher wrote: > >> Hi Patrick (Congratulations on today) Techn

HTML5's Offline-first Council of Trent

I was going to post this as a reply to #844 (*) but this topic is a far greater and more of an all-encompassing issue than any single thread can serve. We (all HTML5 Web-App developers) desperately need a schism from the heretical forces

Re: HTML5's Offline-first Council of Trent

, but I'm motivated by results and not married to the process. HTML5 - Web Apps "The journey is *NOT* the destination! On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Patrick H. Lauke <re...@splintered.co.uk> wrote: > On 16/03/2016 04:46, Richard Maher wrote: > ... > >> Anyway, if the

Re: HTML5's Offline-first Council of Trent

know when you’ll have to trade from a deserted island. On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Jake Archibald <jaffathec...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 at 12:14 Richard Maher <mahe...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Your willingness, nay preference, to serve

Re: HTML5's Offline-first Council of Trent

alling the w3c a mafia, > people might actually engage this more seriously. As of right now, I can't > speak for everyone, but I definitely don't like your tone. > > Thanks, > Nick Dugger > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016, 1:52 AM Anders Rundgren < > anders.rundgren@gmail.com&g