n an attempt to load the Yaffle polyfill
doesn't work.
Advice on how to proceed with these issues (filing bugs on the spec
and/or one or more implementations, perhaps?) would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
- Sam Ruby
On 11/25/2014 03:52 PM, David Walp wrote:
Apologies for being a late comer to the discussion, but here is some feedback
in our implementation. We're looking forward to engaging on these interactions
more proactively in the future.
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 6:55 PM, Sam Ruby ru
On 12/02/2014 02:22 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On 12/01/2014 10:22 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Domenic Denicola d...@domenic.me wrote:
What we really need to do is get some popular library
link for now; will update once the CfC completes.
cheers
Chaals
-- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
- Sam Ruby
On 12/03/2014 10:57 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 12/3/14 10:42 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On 12/02/2014 06:54 PM, cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote:
I'm new to being a W3C Editor, but I did manage to find:
http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules
Besides the above, the following which includes links
, but determining the origin of file: URLs isn't. Clearly
identifying what parts are widely deployed and unlikely to change vs
those that aren't may be a path forward.
-Boris
- Sam Ruby
, 04:19, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net:
On 11/18/2014 03:18 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Meanwhile, I'm working to integrate the following first into the
WHATWG version of the spec, and then through the WebApps
process:
http://intertwingly.net/projects/pegurl/url.html
Integration is proceeding
standards - CTO Office, Yandex
cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
- Sam Ruby
the same suggestion to Wendy. I'd love for the end result to
be a truly joint proposal.
- Sam Ruby
On 12/02/2014 10:28 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On 12/02/2014 09:23 AM, cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote:
TL;DR: The administrative hold-ups are now all my fault, so I'm sorry
if they persist, and I
On 12/02/2014 04:37 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
[offlist]
Oopsie. Note to self: double check cc list before sending emails.
In any case, the suggestion for pull requests applies to everyone.
- Sam Ruby
I notice that you are on GitHub. One thing I encourage you to do is to
directly edit:
https
/url/webspecs/develop/ isn't
ready yet.
Once it is ready, I plan to sync all documents.
- Sam Ruby
On 11/18/2014 03:18 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Meanwhile, I'm working to integrate the following first into the WHATWG
version of the spec, and then through the WebApps process:
http://intertwingly.net/projects/pegurl/url.html
Integration is proceeding, current results can be seen here:
https
/projects/pegurl/url.html#discuss
And by all means, don't stop there!
- Sam Ruby
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 6:55 PM, Sam Ruby
ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
Now to get to what I personally am most interested in: identifying
changes to the expected test results, and therefore to the URL
On 11/18/2014 09:51 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 10/29/14 9:54 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
I am willing to help with this effort.
Thanks for this information [1] and sorry for the delayed reply.
Given URL is a joint deliverable between WebApps and TAG, perhaps it
would be helpful if you were a co
On 11/18/2014 03:08 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 11/18/14 3:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On 11/18/2014 09:51 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Given URL is a joint deliverable between WebApps and TAG, perhaps it
would be helpful if you were a co-Editor. Are you interested in that
role?
Yes.
OK
describe above were
done, the IETF would be open to the idea of errata to RFC3987 and
updating specs to reference URLs.
- Sam Ruby
[1] http://intertwingly.net/projects/pegurl/url.html
[2] https://www.ietf.org/meeting/91/index.html
[3] https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#relative-scheme
free to comment on these, or
any others, or even to propose new tests.
- Sam Ruby
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:38:08 +0200, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
Meanwhile, what we need is concrete bug reports of specific instances
where the existing WebIDL description of key interfaces is done in a way
, ones that are not likely to
apply in this situation.
- Sam Ruby
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Sep 24, 2009, at 2:16 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Sep 24, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Any TC39 members whose employers can't join could perhaps become Invited
Experts to the W3C Web Applications Working Group, if that facilitates
review
20 matches
Mail list logo
