to me that elem.find() will never
return ancestors of elem.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 6/9/13 7:35 PM, Timmy Willison wrote:
I was a little confused. I realized something I
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
Just throw away your notion that .find() does any scoping whatsoever.
Ok, will do.
It doesn't; all it does is provide a reference element, which is
matched by :scope and which is used to absolutize relative
querySelector is
supposed to do. Element#querySelector returns results based off of the tree in
which the element is located.
Thanks,
- Timmy
] and .querySelector[All] relate to the context object? Why the
wording difference?
Thanks again,
- Timmy
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Timmy timmywill...@gmail.com wrote:
The wording of the QSA and findAll definitions are a bit confusing to me.
Forgive me if I'm misunderstanding
is only fired as a result of a call to abort().
+1
--
Glenn Maynard
- Timmy
equivalent to deprecating them,
which would be a win.
This is extraneous. The implementation of custom pseudo selectors would be
identical.
- Timmy
