Re: CfC: FPWD for Input Events

1 or -1 to the proposal which is the first comment in > https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/1 > > For the chairs, with thanks to Johannes and the people working on editing > > chaals > > -- > Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex > cha...@yandex-t

CfC: FPWD for Input Events

osal which is the first comment in https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/1 For the chairs, with thanks to Johannes and the people working on editing chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Re: Meeting between Web platform and ARIA at TPAC

cases / requirements there. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Type correction Re: New editors for Clipboard API spec

On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 02:16:17 +0200, Chaals McCathie Nevile <cha...@yandex-team.ru> wrote: Hi, I'm happy to announce Grisha *Lyukshin*. Sorry Grisha and Gary Kačmarčik as the new editors of the Clipboard API specification, and to thank them for volunteering, cheers -- C

Fwd: Minutes / results of editing meeting

FYI --- Forwarded message --- From: "Chaals McCathie Nevile" <cha...@yandex-team.ru> To: "public-editing...@w3.org" <public-editing...@w3.org> Cc: Subject: Minutes / results of meeting Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 23:51:18 +0200 Hi folks, Detailed minutes are

New editors for Clipboard API spec

Hi, I'm happy to announce Grisha Lyushkin and Gary Kačmarčik as the new editors of the Clipboard API specification, and to thank them for volunteering, as well as Hallvord for the work he put into it until now. cheers -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex

Re: Draft recharter proposal

On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 18:29:44 +0200, Olli Pettay <o...@pettay.fi> wrote: On 07/29/2016 06:13 PM, Chaals McCathie Nevile wrote: Hi folks, our charter expires at the end of September. I've produced a draft version of a new charter, for people to comment on: http://w3c.github.io/charte

Draft recharter proposal

what actually works, rather than adding in what we would like. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Re: Call for Consensus: Publish HTML 5.2 FPWD?

On Tue, 05 Jul 2016 16:15:32 +0200, Chaals McCathie Nevile <cha...@yandex-team.ru> wrote: This is a call for consensus on the proposition: Publish the current editors' draft of HTML 5.2 - https://w3c.github.io/html/ - as a First Public Working Draft. With a positive re

Review request: Wake Lock API

to be endorsed by this group, comments should be made in a personal capacity. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Re: Quick update on WebIDL "Level 1"

On Fri, 08 Jul 2016 22:21:10 +0200, Domenic Denicola wrote: From: Travis Leithead [mailto:travis.leith...@microsoft.com] The purpose of the “Level 1” document is to serve as a stable reference for W3C specs that link to WebIDL. It contains a subset of the WebIDL syntax

Thank you Hallvord (looking for Clipboard API editor…)

about. Thank you Hallvord, all the best, and I hope we see you back in the Working Group at some stage. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Call for Consensus: Publish HTML 5.2 FPWD?

to the work mode for assessing consensus. There will be a separate thread on the merits of any procedural change - please *only* reply to this thread to support or oppose the FPWD publication. cheers Chaals, for the chairs -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha

Re: CFC: Republish Pointer Lock as CR

On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:33:30 +0200, Vincent Scheib wrote: An accessibility review and handling of this [accessibility issue #1] are still needed and will likely cause a CR cycle. To avoid unnecessary work I propose CR to be deferred until that work is complete.

Re: Request to move HTML5.1 to Candidate Recommendation (CR)

afraid it's part of running the W3C process. If everything goes smoothly, you can expect this for HTML twice more in the next year: once to move to Proposed Recommendation, and once to move 5.2 to First Public Working Draft. cheers Chaals On 3 Jun 2016, at 12:36 AM, Mona Rekhi <mona.re...@ssbbar

Re: CFC: Request to move HTML5.1 to Candidate Recommendation (CR)

On Thu, 02 Jun 2016 14:48:10 +0200, Léonie Watson <t...@tink.uk> wrote: Hello WP, This is a call for consensus to request that W3C publish the current HTML Working Draft (WD) as a Candidate Recommendation (CR). +1 Please do. chaals - Yandex hat on, chair hat off -- Charles McCathie

Re: Self-introduction from Wanming Lin

Welcome Wanming! On Tue, 31 May 2016 09:46:15 +0200, Lin, Wanming wrote: Hello WP, My name is Wanming Lin, many thanks Wayne for inviting me join in WP WG. I work for Intel OTC Web QA team which focuses on testing work for advanced Web technologies especially for

[Service Workers] meeting july/august?

Hi folks, at the last meeting people suggested another meeting in July/August. Should we be trying to schedule one? The Editing folks are meeting in California 29 July. Something just before that would be very convenient for *me*. Others of course may have unaccountably different

About the packaging spec Re: CFC

Hi Marcos, On Wed, 25 May 2016 00:52:07 +0100, wrote: On 25 May 2016, at 3:54 AM, Léonie Watson wrote: At the AC meeting in March 2016 the WP co-chairs indicated that the Packaging on the Web specification [1] would benefit from further incubation

Re: CFC: Publish as W3C Notes

rables. for the chairs Chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Re: [service worker] f2f meeting notes, next meeting details

On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 07:01:14 +0200, Matt Falkenhagen <fal...@chromium.org> wrote: 2016-02-10 0:21 GMT+09:00 Chaals McCathie Nevile <cha...@yandex-team.ru>: There will be another face to face meeting to discuss service workers, hosted by Microsoft in Seattle or Redmond, on 11-12

[Web Components] Minutes - Shadow DOM teleconf April 5

Available at https://www.w3.org/2016/04/05-webapps-minutes.html or as text below. Thanks to Jan Miksovsky for logistics, and in particular for scribing! [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - Web Components Teleconference 05

Re: Telecon / meeting on first week of April for Web Components

On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 13:45:16 +0200, Chaals McCathie Nevile <cha...@yandex-team.ru> wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:24:59 +0200, Jan Miksovsky <jan@component.kitchen> wrote: It sounds like there’s general interest in making this happen, so I went ahead and set up a

Re: Telecon / meeting on first week of April for Web Components

On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:24:59 +0200, Jan Miksovsky <jan@component.kitchen> wrote: It sounds like there’s general interest in making this happen, so I went ahead and set up a Doodle poll for this: http://doodle.com/poll/z7qvrafbxw4zyit9. (Chaals: I just noticed you offered

TPAC schedule proposal

us know… chaals, for the chairs. -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Re: Telecon / meeting on first week of April for Web Components

t; having it in early morning or late evening? > If so, we can schedule it at UTC 3PM, which is 8AM in bay area, > midnight in Tokyo, and 5AM in Europe. Actually it's 5PM in Europe - much nicer ;) > Another option is at UTC 7AM, which is 11PM in bay area, 3PM in Tokyo, and 8AM in Europ

Re: HTML editors meeting

inimum standards required for polite discussion. Please refresh your memory of the group's workmode, including expected standards of behaviour. cheers Chaals (as co-chair). Thanks Ms2ger On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Léonie Watson <t...@tink.uk> wrote: Hello, There will be an

Re: Meeting for selection API at TPAC?

On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:42:07 +0100, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@apple.com> wrote: Thanks for the rely. Léonie & Chaals, could we allocate a time slot to discuss selection? Sure. Any preferences for minimising clashes? How long do you think you need? cheers Chaals On Mar 15, 2016,

Re: HTML5's Offline-first Council of Trent

The chairs and various individuals requested that Mr Maher use a tone acceptable in this group. This email once again fails to meet the minimum standards of politeness and constructive behaviour for this group. Mr Maher has been removed from the mailing list. for the chairs chaals

Meeting at TPAC - need to plan space.

, but getting the basics right helps everyone. cheers Chaals (for the chairs) -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

TPAC 2016 - meetings

feedback on the plan itself. cheers Chaals, for the chairs -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Re: [clipboard] Sanitizing HTML content for security/privacy on copy or paste?

On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 12:39:33 +0100, Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen wrote: Hi, some discussion of how browsers can try to safeguard security/privacy while copying/pasting HTML got tangled into the "remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types" thread [1]. I think it

[service worker] f2f meeting notes, next meeting details

://github.com/w3c/WebPlatformWG/blob/gh-pages/meetings/11-12aprSW.md To register for the meeting, or request agenda or remote attendance please make a pull request on that page or in reply to this thread on the email list. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office

Art steps down - thank you for everything

, and I hope to see you around. Chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Service Workers meeting, 11-12 April in Seattle

If you hope or expect to attend, whether in person or remotely, please add your name to the page via a Pull Request, or ask us to do so. cheers Chaals - on behalf of the chairs -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http

Remote participation Re: Apple will host Re: Custom Elements meeting will be 25th Jan (not 29th)

On Wed, 06 Jan 2016 11:59:55 +0100, Takayoshi Kochi (河内 隆仁) wrote: On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > On Jan 6, 2016, at 12:05 AM, Takayoshi Kochi (河内 隆仁) > > Is there any option to attend this remotely (telcon or

Re: time at TPAC other than Wednesday?

d it. If you want to talk about the process, I'd like to start from there. The chairs did. As per the W3C Process. Cheers Chaals To your question about removing ContentEditable=”true”. The idea is consolidate multiple documents into a single editing specification document. W

Apple will host Re: Custom Elements meeting will be 25th Jan (not 29th)

On Mon, 07 Dec 2015 13:39:25 +1000, Chaals McCathie Nevile <cha...@yandex-team.ru> wrote: we are trying to shift the date of the Custom Elements meeting to *25* Jan, from the previously proposed date of 29th. We are currently looking for a host in the Bay area - offers grat

Custom Elements meeting will be 25th Jan (not 29th)

and I are confirmed for the 25th, so listed those people already cheers Chaals For the chairs -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Re: Meeting date, january

On Tue, 01 Dec 2015 00:15:23 +1000, Léonie Watson <lwat...@paciellogroup.com> wrote: From: Chaals McCathie Nevile [mailto:cha...@yandex-team.ru] Sent: 26 November 2015 01:55 it appears that there are some people may not be able to attend a meeting on the 29th - although App

Meeting date, january

(e.g. bought inflexible tickets, another clash, …) By default, we won't move the meeting, but if there are a number of people affected and it makes sense, we could do so. If so, I'd like to make that decision early next week. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO

No meeting in december Re: [web components] proposed meetings: 15 dec / 29 jan

OK, just to formally close the loop we will not have a meeting in December. cheers On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 05:12:55 +0100, Hayato Ito wrote: Thank you, Ryosuke. I'm fine not to have a meeting in Dec. Let me add a link to GitHub issue(s) for each item: 1. Clarify focus

29 Jan? Re: [web components] proposed meetings: 15 dec / 29 jan

On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:32:06 +0100, Chaals McCathie Nevile <cha...@yandex-team.ru> wrote: https://github.com/w3c/WebPlatformWG/blob/gh-pages/meetings/15decWC.md https://github.com/w3c/WebPlatformWG/blob/gh-pages/meetings/16janWC.md Offers of hosting will be very gratefully received. We need

[web components] proposed meetings: 15 dec / 29 jan

Hi folks, in the poll we ran, there were only about 10 responses, and the preference split was pretty even. I also forgot to make a place where people could provide their name :( Our proposal is to look for a host on 15 December on the West Coast, for a meeting primarily focused on

Vote: f2f Meeting(s) for components

, please reply asap. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Re: [pointerlock] Oct 2015 Pointer Lock Status

hat if it hasn't already happened. (I'm flying and not in a position to do the archaeology support for my memory). cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Re: [pointerlock] Oct 2015 Pointer Lock Status

On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 05:08:10 +0900, Vincent Scheib <sch...@google.com> wrote: On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 3:42 AM, Chaals McCathie Nevile < cha...@yandex-team.ru> wrote: Yes. You are *not* required to use testharness tests. While it would be good to get the automation of stuff like

Re: [Web Components] proposing a f2f...

minute, hopefully tomorrow. Feel free to add to the thread in the meantime. cheers From: "Takayoshi Kochi (河内 隆仁)" <ko...@google.com> Sent: Oct 30, 2015 2:52 PM To: Ryosuke Niwa Cc: Cynthia Shelly; Chris Wilson; Travis Leithead; Dimitri Glazkov; Olli Pettay; Chaals McCathie Nev

[Web Components] proposing a f2f...

. cheers Chaals close action-759 -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Re: Making progress with items in Web Platform Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

Offlist. On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 19:36:54 +0200, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren@gmail.com> wrote: On 2015-10-17 17:58, Chaals McCathie Nevile wrote: Regarding App-to-App interaction I'm personally mainly into the Web-to-Native variant. As I already pointed out to Daniel, this

Making progress with items in Web Platform Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

o-Native variant. As I already pointed out to Daniel, this stuff is not in the current scope of the group, and you should work on it in the context of e.g. the Web Incubator Community Group, where it is relevant to their scope. chaals, for the chairs. Here the browser vendors have reported

Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

TL;DR: It's worth pursuing, but chat in WICG first to get a proposal that Web Platform WG will formally take up. On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:26:11 +0200, Daniel Buchner wrote: After publishing the post, Google has reached out and we’ve been discussing options for solving

Repos and specs Re: [admin] Web Platform WG is the new WebApps

to do with HTML, which is clearly far too much stuff to have in one repo, beyond noting that "it is clearly too big to be a single work item"... cheers Chaals On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Marcos Caceres <w...@marcosc.com> wrote: On October 12, 2015 at 8:23:25

Re: Proposal: CSS WG / WebApps Joint Meeting for Shadow DOM Styling

I added a note (as a question) to the meeting wiki page: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/October2015Meeting cheers On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:12:16 +0500, John Daggett wrote: Late Tuesday afternoon would be a good fit for me. On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Ryosuke

Minutes from Components face to face

, my humblest apologies to those who tried but could not participate remotely through no fault of theirs. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types

On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 08:24:17 -0400, Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen hst...@mozilla.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Chaals McCathie Nevile cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote: I'm just thinking out loud here, but this problem is similar to one already faced by email clients, especially

Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types

I'm just thinking out loud here, but this problem is similar to one already faced by email clients, especially those which are web-based... On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 15:03:40 -0400, Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen hst...@mozilla.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Daniel Cheng

Re: [WebIDL] T[] migration

16.07.2015, 17:59, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl: On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Travis Leithead travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote:  Should we consider keeping T[] in WebIDL, but having it map to FrozenArray? We should just update the relevant specifications. That seems a rational

Re: Components F2F

Google had offered to host the meeting, and I believe they are on it. Obviously, offers to share the hosting effort are welcome in general. I haven't checked but agree that based on last time 22 might be squeezing it. cheers 02.07.2015, 09:11, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl: On Thu, Jul

F2F Meeting: Custom Elements, 21 July, Bay Area California

an accessible working setup for remote participation. We will take minutes in webapps' IRC channel irc://irc.w3.org/#webapps in the usual way. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Registration now open Re: F2F Meeting: Custom Elements, 21 July, Bay Area California

will be available soon, and will be announced. We will try to provide an accessible working setup for remote participation. We will take minutes in webapps' IRC channel irc://irc.w3.org/#webapps in the usual way. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex

Re: A Second Edition of Web Storage? [was: Re: Web Storage Rec errata?]

12.05.2015, 13:35, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com: Hi All, Thanks for this analysis Xiaoqian. Based on the differences, I think moving toward a 2nd edition REC seems reasonable. Re the next publication step, it seems like the next publication should be a (4 week) wide review WD

Re: A Second Edition of Web Storage? [was: Re: Web Storage Rec errata?]

In this case we don't know if the spec is feature complete. We just know there are things that need to be done. If they turn out to be all that needs to be done the thing is feature complete, and we ask for CR. If not, we hope to discover so now. But then, it's not a big deal either way. It

Nice version Re: Minutes of Shadow DOM meeting

Chaals, Léonie, Mike™, AnnevK, Arron, Travis, Hayato, Smaug, DGlazkov, CWilso, AlexR, SamW, Maciej, TedOC, HayatoIto, Rysouke, JanMiskovsky, DomenicD, Travis_Leithead, AliceBoxhall, WilliamChen, ScottM, ErikBryn, MarkG, SteveOrvell, Misko, WilsonPage, AdamKlein, TaylorSavage, JustinF Regrets Chair

Re: Minutes of Shadow DOM meeting

...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com Title: Web apps Web COmponents meeting -- 24 Apr 2015 - DRAFT - Web apps Web COmponents meeting 24 Apr 2015 Agenda See also: IRC log Attendees Present Chaals, Léonie, Mike™, AnnevK, Arron, Travis, Hayato, Smaug, DGlazkov, CWilso

Minutes of Shadow DOM meeting

-webapps-minutes.html cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Re: Better focus support for Shadow DOM

Hi, I noted the bugs, this thread, and the document in the HTML accessibility wiki where I am trying to collate stuff about focus navigation and similar keyboard access issues (in what might yet be a vain attempt to really improve the situation which is overall pretty dismal still): 

Fwd: Getting to Zaragoza (may be harder)

Beginning of forwarded message 26.01.2015, 20:47, cha...@yandex-team.ru cha...@yandex-team.ru: Hi, TL;DR: May be harder to get a train, will probably be more expensive than I said. I've been looking at the renfe site recently. There may or may not be trains, or fewer

Re: Feedback needed for April 2015 face-to-face location by *January 27, 2015*

. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

IME API…

directly with the editors in Japanese if that's easier, although the rest of us would appreciate at least a summary of detailed discussions or questions that turn out to be non-trivial). cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find

Re: Better focus support for Shadow DOM

nversation, but for the moment it is on public-html-a...@w3.org and on their wiki - listed as accesskey for increasingly irrelevant historical reasons http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/51wishlist cheers Chaals 14.01.2015, 08:30, "Takayoshi Kochi (河内 隆仁)" ko...@google.com:Hi, For shadow DOMs which ha

Re: Better focus support for Shadow DOM

the work. There is a question of where it makes more sense to have the conversation, but for the moment it is on public-html-a...@w3.org and on their wiki - listed as accesskey for increasingly irrelevant historical reasons http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/51wishlist cheers Chaals 14.01.2015, 08:30

Re: [Selection] Should selection.getRangeAt return a clone or a reference?

13.01.2015, 05:31, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu: On 1/12/15 1:56 PM, Olivier Forget wrote:  Unfortunately  multiple range selections are not a nice to have. All real editors  (MS Word, Google Docs, etc..) support selecting multiple ranges Precisely.  This is why Gecko ended up supporting

Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive

13.01.2015, 00:57, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@apple.com:  On Jan 12, 2015, at 4:13 AM, cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote:  09.01.2015, 16:42, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl:  I'm wondering if it's feasible to provide developers with the  primitive that the combination of Shadow DOM and CSS Scoping

Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive

worth it, or are there other things I didn't think of (quite likely, given I spent multiple seconds on the question)? cheers Chaals This is a bit different from the `all` property as that just changes the values of all properties, it does not make a selector such as div no longer match. So

[Manifest] Navigation Scope is unclear

Hi, I'm trying to understand the navigation scope section of the manifest spec. More or less all the links are circular references, which isn't making it any clearer. An example or two would really help... cheers -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex

Re: URL Spec WorkMode (was: PSA: Sam Ruby is co-Editor of URL spec)

TL;DR: Administrative details from the W3C Webapps cochair responsible for URL in that group. Relevant in practice is a request to minimise channels of communication to simplify spec archaeology, and especially to prefer public-webapps over www-archive, but I don't see there is any reason this

Re: URL Spec WorkMode

for Consensus - but I imagine it will be a formality. Cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Re: URL Spec WorkMode

to work together is to find consensus. If we do that any of us can write it down. If not, who wrote the agreement doesn't matter. Anyway, on to deal with the things that are overdue already... cheers Chaals  - Sam Ruby  On 12/02/2014 10:28 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:  On 12/02/2014 09:23 AM, cha

CfC: Move URL spec to 2014 Process (and publish)

before midnight Hawaii time on Wednesday December 10. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

PSA: Publishing working draft of URL spec

to move the document to the 2014 Process, but it doesn't really matter whether this or the next Public Working Draft is published under that process so it won't hold up a Public Working Draft if we can get the pubrules etc sorted in time. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards

Re: URL Spec WorkMode

 Chaals  --  Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex  cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com - Sam Ruby -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Re: CfC: Move URL spec to 2014 Process (and publish)

03.12.2014, 02:41, cha...@yandex-team.ru cha...@yandex-team.ru: Hello all, this is a call for consensus on the proposal Webapps will publish future drafts of the URL specification under the 2014 Process Document http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/ Silence will be taken as assent but

Re: CfC: publish a WG Note of Fullscreen; deadline November 14

08.11.2014, 14:43, Domenic Denicola d...@domenic.me: From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@gmail.com]  OK, so I just checked in a patch that sets the Latest Editor's Draft points to Anne's document  https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/fullscreen/raw-file/default/TR.html. I think it would be ideal

Re: CfC: publish WG Note of XHR Level 2; deadline November 14

08.11.2014, 14:46, Domenic Denicola d...@domenic.me: From: cha...@yandex-team.ru [mailto:cha...@yandex-team.ru]  That doesn't work with the way W3C manages its work and paper trails. I guess I was just inspired by Mike Smith earlier saying something along the lines of don't let past practice

Re: CfC: publish a WG Note of Fullscreen; deadline November 14

07.11.2014, 14:41, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com: [ Sorry for the cross posting but the Fullscreen spec is a joint deliverable for WebApps and CSS ] Hi Anne, Tantek, WebApps and CSSWG, During WebApps' October 27 f2f meeting, the attendees had a straw-poll regarding stopping work on

Re: CfC: publish a WG Note of Fullscreen; deadline November 14

07.11.2014, 17:53, fantasai fantasai.li...@inkedblade.net: On 11/07/2014 09:01 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:  On 11/7/14 8:48 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:  On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote:  [Draft-Note]

Re: CfC: publish a WG Note of Fullscreen; deadline November 14

07.11.2014, 15:05, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com: On 11/7/14 8:43 AM, cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote:  07.11.2014, 14:41, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com:  [ Sorry for the cross posting but the Fullscreen spec is a joint  a) Stop work on the spec (and remove it as a deliverable

Re: CfC: publish WG Note of XHR Level 2; deadline November 14

07.11.2014, 18:28, Domenic Denicola d...@domenic.me:  On Nov 7, 2014, at 17:55, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:  On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote:  https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/default/TR/XHRL2-Note-2014-Nov.html  Should this not

Spring meeting in Paris?

in the first week of May in Paris. Note that 1 and 8 May are both french holidays. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Re: [streams-api] Seeking status of the Streams API spec

- annevk@, feras.moussa@, domenic@, acolwell@, art.barstow@ 23.10.2014, 15:06, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com: On 10/22/14 6:27 PM, Paul Cotton wrote:  given the magnitude of the changes in [changeset], a new WD should be  published.  Can we please wait until after the TPAC week to

Re: FileSystem API Comments

stuff into a different program myself instead of having to go through a service provider, that doesn't work for web-based email systems even when those are designed to be functional offline. etc etc. cheers Chaals Or am I missing something in your message? Cheers,  David On 22/10/14 12:23

Re: Questions on the future of the XHR spec, W3C snapshot

in a position to do so? cheers Chaals -- Jungkee --- Original Message --- Sender : Domenic Denicoladome...@domenicdenicola.com Date   : 2014-10-20 11:44 (GMT+09:00) Title  : RE: Questions on the future of the XHR spec, W3C snapshot I just remembered another similar situation

Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Orientation API; deadline September 18

06.10.2014, 09:19, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc: On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 2:28 PM,  cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote:  So the question turns on whether the changes would invalidate a patent review, and my quick guess is that the answer is yes ;( Really? I would have made the opposite

Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Orientation API; deadline September 18

Please please do. That's a useful thing to do regularly… 02.10.2014, 13:17, Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr: Can we at least publish a new WD so people stop referring to the old TR/? -- Mounir On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, at 20:36, Arthur Barstow wrote:  On 9/25/14 9:26 AM, Mounir Lamouri wrote:  

Re: CfC: to using new pub process; deadline October 2

25.09.2014, 16:06, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com: On 9/25/14 9:32 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote:  Ok so, let's start getting consensus on the new pub work flow [1]. I want us to be the first using the new pub process the second it is available.  Does anyone object to Editors in this

Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Selection API; deadline Sept 30

23.09.2014, 02:23, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com: Ryosuke proposes WebApps publish a First Public Working Draft of Selection API and this is a Call for Consensus to do so, using the following Editor's Draft as the basis (draft FPWD is [1]):    http://w3c.github.io/selection-api/

Re: [xhr]

much serious fallout. (My 2 kopecks) chaals

Re: Push API draft update

are looking forward to feedback on this update, with the goal of getting to FPWD by TPAC if possible. OK, noted. cheers Chaals Thanks, Bryan Sullivan + From: EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA e...@tid.es Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 07:48:49 +0200 To: public-webapps (public-webapps@w3.org) public

Re: CfC: publish Widgets PC as a Proposed Edited Recommendation; deadline August 28

support (as an individual). cheers Chaals -- Chaals - standards declaimer

  1   2   >