± From: Aryeh Gregor [mailto:a...@aryeh.name]
± Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 4:59 AM
±
± On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Ms2ger ms2...@gmail.com wrote:
± FWIW, Aryeh is currently studying full time and doesn't follow web
± standards discussions regularly.
±
± I do check them from time
± From: annevankeste...@gmail.com
± Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 11:16 PM
±
± On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Alex Mogilevsky alex...@microsoft.com
wrote:
± I am working on editing in IE, have issues of various scale that could
± benefit from a discussion in standards environment. Short
It looks like Editing API draft is currently abandoned and there isn't any
activity on the topic in this list for a while (as far as I can find in the
archives)...
I am working on editing in IE, have issues of various scale that could benefit
from a discussion in standards environment. Short
a place to
discuss...
From: Travis Leithead
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 8:56 PM
To: Alex Mogilevsky; Web Applications Working Group WG; Aryeh Gregor
Subject: RE: [editing] Is this the right list to discuss editing?
Alex, work on Editing APIs was ongoing in the Community Group
(http://www.w3.org
There was a discussion here a while ago on desired default behavior for Enter
in contenteditable and options for execCommand(defaultParagraphSeparator):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-whatwg-archive/2011May/thread.html#msg171
Did it ever get to consensus? Or is there new thinking on
± From: Pablo Flouret [mailto:pab...@motorola.com]
± Sent: Monday, February 4, 2013 12:47 PM
±
± On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 11:59:46 -0800, Alex Mogilevsky alex...@microsoft.com
± wrote:
±
± There was a discussion here a while ago on desired default behavior
± for Enter in contenteditable and options
