Re: Holding WP meetings

2016-01-27 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 1/12/16 3:44 AM, Léonie Watson wrote: Léonie, Ade, Chaals and Art (WP co-chairs) I agree with everything Léonie said but, FTR, I resigned from this group a few weeks ago. -Best wishes, AB

CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web IDL Level 1; deadline December 9

2015-12-02 Thread Arthur Barstow
Yves and Travis would like to publish a Candidate Recommendation of WebIDL Level 1 and this is a Call for Consensus to do so. The draft CR is: If anyone has comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply by December 9 at the

Fwd: Fingerprinting Guidance for Web Specification Authors

2015-12-01 Thread Arthur Barstow
Editors, All - please see "Fingerprinting Guidance for Web Specification Authors" and reflect it in your spec, accordingly. Forwarded Message Subject:Fingerprinting Guidance for Web Specification

Re: CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Storage 2nd Edition; deadline October 27

2015-11-02 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi Xiaoqian - this CfC passed so please go forward with PR publication as you proposed below. -Thanks! On 10/20/15 1:31 PM, Xiaoqian Wu wrote: This is a Call for Consensus to publish a Proposed Recommendation of Web Storage (Second Edition) using the [PR] as the basis. Agreement with this CfC

[admin] Minutes from Technical Plenary 28 October 2015

2015-11-02 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 11/2/15 1:04 AM, Coralie Mercier wrote: Minutes from TPAC 2015 [1] are available: 1) Plenary day (Public minutes) http://www.w3.org/2015/10/27-tpac-minutes.html ... We encourage those who held break-out sessions to update the session grid with pointers to minutes or wiki notes.

Re: Notes from the future of HTML session at TPAC

2015-10-28 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 10/28/15 4:46 AM, Léonie Watson wrote: Thanks to everyone for a useful and informative discussion. Minutes available from the following palces: Web: http://www.w3.org/2015/10/28-html-minutes.html Thanks! Would someone with write privs to these minutes please commit to at least

[admin] Request for Spec Status and Plans; deadline Oct 25

2015-10-22 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi WebPlatform/WebApps, The To: list includes Editors that are not registered for next week's [f2f] meeting but others are welcome to reply ... Editors - I expect next week's meeting will include the traditional "round robin" of spec status and plans. As such, if you are an Editor and will

[Spec Reviews] Internationalization Best Practices for Spec Developers

2015-10-20 Thread Arthur Barstow
The I18N WG group published a FPWD of "Internationalization Best Practices for Spec Developers". This document includes recommendations and best practices for spec writers regarding topics such as characters, language, text direction, etc. I presume this document (or a document like this)

Re: PSA: Change the Latest Editor's Drafts of WebStorage, WebWorkers, WebMessaging, Server-Sent Events and WebSockets

2015-10-20 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 10/19/15 1:52 PM, Xiaoqian Wu wrote: The Web Platform WG intents to update the Latest Editor's Drafts of a set of HTML5 API specs, including WebStorage, WebWorkers, WebMessaging, Server-Sent Events and WebSockets. As no one in WPWG has committed to work on these specs, the latest EDs will

Re: TPAC Topic: Using ES2015 Modules in HTML

2015-10-16 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 10/15/15 11:39 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: Can we discuss how we can integrate ES2015 modules into HTML on Tuesday, October 27th at TPAC? Both Gecko and WebKit are basically done implementing ES6 module supports in their respective JavaScript engines but blocked on

Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

2015-10-15 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 10/14/15 12:33 PM, Daniel Buchner wrote: Hey WebAppers, Just ran into this dragon for the 1,326^th time, so thought I would do a write-up to rekindle discussion on this important area of developer need the platform currently fails to address:

RfC: WebRTC 1.0; deadline Oct 23

2015-10-15 Thread Arthur Barstow
[ Stefan's e-mail hasn't been delivered to p-webapps so Dom asked me to forward it ] Forwarded Message Subject:Review of WebRTC 1.0 from Web Applications Working Group Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:05:57 + From: Stefan Håkansson LK

Re: CR: Web Storage (Second Edition)

2015-10-14 Thread Arthur Barstow
Josh - FYI, I just added your comments as . -Thanks On 7/2/15 9:38 PM, timeless wrote: http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/CR-webstorage-20150609/ Particpate: [sic] the event must have its key attribute initialised to the name of the key in question,

Re: [admin] Web Platform WG is the new WebApps

2015-10-12 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 10/12/15 12:23 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote: Please use separate repositories for each work item. Yes, that is expectation -> all of the WG's specs will have their own repo (mostly are under github.com/w3c//) and my expectation is that any new spec the group starts would also have its

[admin] Web Platform WG is the new WebApps

2015-10-12 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi All, On October 10, the consortium formerly started the Web Platform WG [Charter] thus terminating WebApps. My expectation is this change will have little to no impact on any work started in WebApps. That said, please note the charter indicates WebApps' less developed specs (f.ex. the

RfC: Service Workers and "Portable Web Publications for the Open Web Platform"

2015-10-05 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi All, The Digital Publishing Interest Group [1] is seeking feedback regarding the use of Service Workers in their early draft (WIP) of "Portable Web Publications for the Open Web Platform", in particular section 5.1 "General Architecture for Online/Offline Publications":

Re: Proposal: CSS WG / WebApps Joint Meeting for Shadow DOM Styling

2015-09-29 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 9/29/15 11:19 AM, Alan Stearns wrote: On 9/28/15, 4:49 PM, "rn...@apple.com on behalf of Ryosuke Niwa" wrote: Hi, Attending the recent meeting for shadow DOM styling [1] convinced me to join CSS WG, and further that we need a joint meeting between CSS WG and WebApps WG

Re: RfC: Service Workers

2015-09-23 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 9/23/15 1:46 PM, Phillips, Addison wrote: Could you better define what "soon" means? More specifically, do you have a deadline for comments? I don't see any dates in the thread below. I think four weeks is the `normal` expectation for `wide reviews`. However, the Editors and some active

Re: RfC: Service Workers

2015-09-21 Thread Arthur Barstow
Please use the Version 1 branch for this review: <https://slightlyoff.github.io/ServiceWorker/spec/service_worker_1/> On 9/21/15 7:27 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: [ Bcc: TAG (www-tag), WebAppSec WG (public-webapsec), Mobile IG (public-web-mobile), W3C Chairs (chairs), Review Announc

Re: Normative references to Workers.

2015-09-21 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 9/21/15 5:54 AM, Ms2ger wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/21/2015 11:05 AM, Xiaoqian Wu wrote: If it helps, I’d like to prepare a Workers draft to revise the previous CR, and schedule the publication ASAP (hopefully 22 Sep). The goal is to synchronise with the

RfC: Service Workers

2015-09-21 Thread Arthur Barstow
[ Bcc: TAG (www-tag), WebAppSec WG (public-webapsec), Mobile IG (public-web-mobile), W3C Chairs (chairs), Review Announce list (public-review-announce), Geolocation WG (public-geolocation) ] The Editors and active contributors of Service Workers intend to publish a Candidate Recommendation

Re: Service Workers 1 and Nightly

2015-09-18 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 9/18/15 2:22 AM, Jungkee Song wrote: Hi all, We editors are happy to announce that we make a new branch for Service Workers 1 today [1]. Thanks to all the contributions, Service Workers 1 now covers the fundamental model and the associated APIs to support offline-first and background

Re: Normative references to Workers.

2015-09-16 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 9/16/15 4:47 AM, Mike West wrote: Note that this is an issue that's going to come up for a number of WebAppSec specs (see https://w3c.github.io/webappsec/specs/powerfulfeatures/#issue-a30f61b8 , for instance (and that

Reminder: [TPAC2015] Registration is now open for Oct 26-30 meeting week; deadline October 7

2015-09-07 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 6/10/15 9:28 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: Registration is now open for the October 26-30 Technical Plenary and all Working Group meeting week [TPAC], this year in Sapporo Japan: <https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2015/> WebApps (the entire group) will meet on Monday and T

Re: [charter] Request for Comments; deadline Sept 10

2015-09-02 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi Josh, Thanks for the feedback! I filed to record your comments regarding the draft charter. A pull request - especially for the the editorial comments (such as typos, missing links, etc.) - would be welcome. Below I reply to a few of your

Re: [charter] What is the plan for Streams API?

2015-08-10 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 8/7/15 8:32 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: Given this status, and in the absence of other feedback, I think the Streams API should remain in WebApps' charter (at least for now). Then later, the work may proceed

[charter] Need clarification about Fetching resources

2015-08-07 Thread Arthur Barstow
All - WebApps' draft charter (formally being reviewed by consortium Members through Sept 10 [1]) includes the following text about Fetching resources: [[ http://www.w3.org/2015/07/web-platform-wg.html#network Fetching resources The Group MAY also define the mechanisms to fetch resources

Re: W3C's version of XMLHttpRequest should be abandoned

2015-08-07 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 8/6/15 8:07 AM, Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen wrote: On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl mailto:ann...@annevk.nl wrote: According to Art the plan of record is to still pursue https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/default/xhr-1/Overview.html And you

Re: [charter] What is the plan for Streams API?

2015-08-07 Thread Arthur Barstow
, the work can be stopped (and a WG Note published). -Thanks, AB Takeshi On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com mailto:art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: On 7/30/15 8:46 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: http://w3c.github.io/charter-html/group-charter.html

Re: PSA: publish WD of WebIDL Level 1

2015-08-07 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 8/4/15 2:21 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, This is heads-up re the intent to publish a Working Draft of WebIDL Level 1 (on or around August 4) using Yves' document as the basis and a new shortname of WebIDL-1

Re: W3C's version of XMLHttpRequest should be abandoned

2015-08-06 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 8/6/15 3:15 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: According to Art https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/default/Overview.html is no longer maintained. WebApps agreed to stop work on the above (aka XHR L2) and published a WG Note in November 2014 [1]. It should redirect to

[charter] What is the plan for Streams API?

2015-08-04 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 7/30/15 8:46 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: http://w3c.github.io/charter-html/group-charter.html The WebApps + HTML WG draft charter says the following about WebApps' Streams API: [[ Streams API https://w3c.github.io/streams-api/ An API for representing a stream of data in web applications

PSA: Arun Ranganathan is now an Invited Expert

2015-08-01 Thread Arthur Barstow
I am pleased to announce Arun is nowan Invited Expert in this group (he is no longer a member of WebApps on behalf of Mozilla). Thanks Arun! -AB

[charter] Request for Comments; deadline Sept 10

2015-07-30 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi All, The proposal to merge the WebApps WG and the HTML WG has started a formal review period that ends September 10: http://w3c.github.io/charter-html/group-charter.html If you have any comments about the proposal, please reply to this e-mail or [Github] before September 10. Note

RfC: LCWD of Tracking Compliance and Scope; deadline October 7

2015-07-16 Thread Arthur Barstow
WebApps has been asked to review the Tracking Protection group's July 14 Last Call Working Draft of T/racking Compliance and Scope/: http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-tracking-compliance-20150714/ If anyone in WebApps wants to propose an official group response, please do so ASAP, in reply to

[html-imports] Syntax is mystic and daunting [Was: Re: HTML5 includes from within body]

2015-07-14 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi Anatoly, Perhaps it would be helpful if you expanded on specific issues with the HTML Imports syntax, either on this list or using an Issue https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/labels/html-imports. -Regards, ArtB On 7/14/15 3:32 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote: 7 years ago the request to

[admin] Moving Custom Elements bugs to Github [Was: Re: Custom Elements bugs will be also migrated]

2015-06-29 Thread Arthur Barstow
Yves, Xiaoqian, Mike - would one of you please do as Hayato requests below (and then notify him so he can move the Custom Elements bugs to Github)? -Thanks, ArtB On 6/25/15 2:49 AM, Hayato Ito wrote: I am thinking about migrating Custom Element bugs[1] to Web Components GitHub Issues [2], as

[admin] WebEx has replaced Zakim

2015-06-29 Thread Arthur Barstow
The consortium's Zakim voice conference bridge has been replaced with WebEx [1][2][3]. The group's meeting page [4] has been updated to reflect this change and calendar invitations were created for the three reoccurring telecons: 1. D3E/UI Events

PSA: publishing new WD of Service Workers on June 25

2015-06-23 Thread Arthur Barstow
This is an announcement of the intent to publish a new Working Draft of Service Workers on June 25 using the following document as the basis: http://slightlyoff.github.io/ServiceWorker/publish/service_worker/WD-service-workers-20150625/ If anyone has any major concerns with this proposal,

[admin] Use public-patent-issues list for all patent discussions [Was: Need a list for Extract Widget patent]

2015-06-17 Thread Arthur Barstow
] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-patent-issues/ On 5/28/15 5:23 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: Rigo, Wendy, Jeff - I don't think it is appropriate to use WebApps' public-webapps list regarding Web Components vs Extract Widget patent [1]. What list should be used? (FYI, Aymeric Vitte's

Re: PSA: Web Components vs Extract Widget patent

2015-06-17 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 6/17/15 5:29 PM, Aymeric Vitte wrote: As directed in [1], if anyone wants to reply to this thread, please use the public-patent-issues list and do *not* reply on public-webapps. -Thank you, AB [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015AprJun/0912.html

Re: [Clipboard] Web API for clipboard changes.

2015-06-16 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 6/16/15 6:58 AM, James M. Greene wrote: Please share it with the rest of the group. Thanks! Agree. Kelvin - please do. -Thanks, AB

Re: [Clipboard] Web API for clipboard changes.

2015-06-11 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 6/2/15 4:05 PM, Kelvin Poon wrote: Hi public-webapps We are exploring a new web API for content to be notified of clipboard changes and would like to discuss it here. The problem For certain classes of web apps, it is necessary to determine when new clipboard contents have been set,

Re: [ime-api] [blink-dev] Removing IME API code from Blink

2015-06-11 Thread Arthur Barstow
] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?component=IME%20APIlist_id=57282product=WebAppsWGresolution=--- -Original Message- From: Ryosuke Niwa [mailto:rn...@apple.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 7:00 PM To: Travis Leithead Cc: Arthur Barstow; public-webapps Subject: Re: [ime-api

Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types

2015-06-10 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 6/10/15 5:32 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen hst...@mozilla.com wrote: Developing web browsers and their specs means paranoia should be part of your job description. It is a concern and I'm not sure how to solve it. Well we

[TPAC2015] Registration is now open for Oct 26-30 meeting week; deadline October 7

2015-06-10 Thread Arthur Barstow
Registration is now open for the October 26-30 Technical Plenary and all Working Group meeting week [TPAC], this year in Sapporo Japan: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2015/ WebApps (the entire group) will meet on Monday and Tuesday (October 26 and 27). Registration for WebApps'

Re: RfC: Style Sheet for Technical Reports; deadline July 7

2015-06-04 Thread Arthur Barstow
is a reference. I suppose the alternatives are color (?), style (italics is used for variables), or weight (used for definitions). Ideas? On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com mailto:art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: Fantasai is leading an effort to improve the style

[charter] Discussions about HTMLWG charter and WebApps

2015-06-01 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi All, If you are interested in the charter of HTMLWG, please note there are related discussions in [GH], and see in particular: http://w3c.github.io/charter-html/html-plan.html Note WebApps is implicated, with at least three different proposals to replace WebApps and HTMLWG with four

RfC: Style Sheet for Technical Reports; deadline July 7

2015-05-29 Thread Arthur Barstow
Fantasai is leading an effort to improve the style sheet used for new Technical Reports. She created a survey [1] that is supposed to reflect the entire group's feedback but she also welcomes individual feedback via the spec-prod list [2], using the 10 questions below as a guide. If you have

CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Storage 2nd Edition deadline June 3 [Was: CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition]

2015-05-29 Thread Arthur Barstow
. -Thanks, ArtB Thanks. — xiaoqian On 2015-5-14, at 7:30pm, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Based on Xiaoqian's analysis [1] of Web Storage changes since the REC was published in 2013, this is a Call for Consensus to: 1. Publish a new WD of the spec and to seek wide review

[admin] Need a list for Extract Widget patent [Was: Re: PSA: Web Components vs Extract Widget patent]

2015-05-28 Thread Arthur Barstow
Rigo, Wendy, Jeff - I don't think it is appropriate to use WebApps' public-webapps list regarding Web Components vs Extract Widget patent [1]. What list should be used? (FYI, Aymeric Vitte's original disclosure was forwarded to the list [1], and Aymeric's followups are [2] and [3]).

[ime-api] Fwd: [blink-dev] Removing IME API code from Blink

2015-05-27 Thread Arthur Barstow
Below is a proposal to remove the experimental IME API implementation from Blink. Is there sufficient interest from other implementers to keep this spec on the TR track or should we formally stop work on it and publish a WG Note? Travis, All, WDYT? -Thanks, ArtB Forwarded Message

PSA: Web Components vs Extract Widget patent

2015-05-20 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi All, For those interested in Web Components, please note I received a related e-mail titled Web Components vs Extract Widget patent. I forwarded this e-mail (which has an attachment) to the www-archive list: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015May/0008.html Please do NOT

PSA: HTML5 Web Messaging is a W3C Recommendation

2015-05-19 Thread Arthur Barstow
Congratulations to Ian and all the contributors! On 5/19/15 12:53 PM, Coralie Mercier wrote: It is my pleasure to announce that HTML5 Web Messaging is published as a W3C Recommendation http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/REC-webmessaging-20150519/ This specification defines two mechanisms for

[admin] Getting notification about WebApp's web-platform-tests activity?

2015-05-18 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi All, Dom has a tool that could be used to notify one of WebApps' mail lists when a wg-webapps label is applied to something (f.ex an Issue or PR) in the web-platform-tests repo. Is this something we want to use? If yes, which list? public-webapps-github seems like the closest match but I

CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21

2015-05-14 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi All, Based on Xiaoqian's analysis [1] of Web Storage changes since the REC was published in 2013, this is a Call for Consensus to: 1. Publish a new WD of the spec and to seek wide review of the spec, per process 2014. The new WD will be placed in w3.org/TR/webstorage/. The draft WD is

Re: A Second Edition of Web Storage? [was: Re: Web Storage Rec errata?]

2015-05-12 Thread Arthur Barstow
wrote: Hi, On 28 Apr 2015, at 15:46, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com mailto:art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/21/15 5:39 AM, Kostiainen, Anssi wrote: Hi, Is there a plan to publish an errata to sync the Web Storage Rec [1] with the latest? I counted 8 commits cherry picked

Re: A Second Edition of Web Storage? [was: Re: Web Storage Rec errata?]

2015-05-12 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 5/12/15 7:57 AM, cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote: I don't think we need a CfC to publish a WD, right? We should just publish it, and then open a CfC on the plan to move to 2nd edition with these changes incorporated, and asking if there are other changes we should include before we move ahead.

Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-11 Thread Arthur Barstow
-Original Message- From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 May 2015 13:55 To: Andrew Twigger Cc: Marcos Caceres; Frederick Hirsch; public-webapps@w3.org Subject: Re: Stability of Widget DigSig Andrew - seeing no objections from the group to removing the Implementers

Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-08 Thread Arthur Barstow
[ + Marcos and Frederick ] Hi Andrew, The group stopped working on XML Digital Signature for Widgets several years ago and there is no plan to resume work (except to process errata as required). Marcos, Frederick - this spec's namespace document includes the following statement: [[

Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-08 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 5/8/15 8:47 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: On 2015-05-08 14:32, Frederick Hirsch wrote: no objection, the referenced document is a Recommendation, isn't it? http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-digsig/ This seems to be a rather theoretical discussion:

Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-08 Thread Arthur Barstow
Andrew - seeing no objections from the group to removing the Implementers ... statement from [NS] document, if that statement is removed, does that address your concern? -Thanks, ArtB [NS] http://www.w3.org/ns/widgets-digsig/ On 5/8/15 7:14 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: [ + Marcos and Frederick

[widgets] implementation data [Was: Re: Stability of Widget DigSig]

2015-05-08 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 5/8/15 8:52 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: On 2015-05-08 14:50, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 5/8/15 8:47 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: On 2015-05-08 14:32, Frederick Hirsch wrote: no objection, the referenced document is a Recommendation, isn't it? http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-digsig/ This seems

RfC: Subresource Integrity; deadline May 26

2015-05-07 Thread Arthur Barstow
The WebAppSec community requests review of Subresource Integrity http://w3c.github.io/webappsec/specs/subresourceintegrity/, specifically: [[ Fetch Integration Privacy and Security Considerations CORS interactions Future Considerations regarding broader integration into other HTML elements

PSA: Martin Thomson joins Push API Editor team

2015-05-01 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi All, We are pleased to announce Mozilla's Martin Thomson has agreed to be a co-Editor of the Push API spec https://w3c.github.io/push-api/. Eduardo and Bryan are no longer able to continue as active editors and we thank them for their past contributions and we hope their active

[selectors-api] How to mark TR version as obsolete/superseded? [Was: Re: Obsolete Document]

2015-04-28 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 3/26/15 8:30 AM, Gulfaraz Yasin wrote: Hi It has come to my notice that the following document http://www.w3.org/TR/selectors-api/#resolving-namespaces is obsolete. Hi Gulfaraz, Thanks for your e-mail and sorry for the slow reply. I was directed to it's page from one of

Re: Web Storage Rec errata?

2015-04-28 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 4/21/15 5:39 AM, Kostiainen, Anssi wrote: Hi, Is there a plan to publish an errata to sync the Web Storage Rec [1] with the latest? I counted 8 commits cherry picked into the Editor's Draft since Rec [2]. If no errata publication is planned, I'd expect the Rec to clearly indicate its

PSA: publishing new WD of Push API on April 30

2015-04-27 Thread Arthur Barstow
This is an announcement of the intent to publish a new WD of Push API on April 30 using the following document as the basis: https://w3c.github.io/push-api/publish/TR.html (The sequence diagram is not found when the above document is loaded but the diagram will be available in the WD

Re: Minutes of Shadow DOM meeting

2015-04-25 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 4/25/15 8:45 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: * cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote: http://www.w3.org/2015/04/25-webapps-minutes.html See http://www.w3.org/2015/04/24-webapps-minutes.html. That contains just a few lines. Looks like the decade-old UTC day change bug is still plaguing the minutes

Re: Minutes of Shadow DOM meeting

2015-04-25 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 4/25/15 8:45 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: * cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote: We'll post a summary - there is most of one at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hnCoaJTXkfSSHD5spISJ76nqbDcOVNMamgByiz3QWLA/edit?pli=1#gid=0 Perhaps a document in some kind of open format would be a better medium

PSA: publishing new WD of UI Events and D3E Keyboard specs April 28/30

2015-04-24 Thread Arthur Barstow
Thanks to Xiaoqian, the UI Events and the two D3E Keyboard Events code/key Values specs have been moved to Github and we plan to publish them next week using the following Draft WDs as the basis: https://w3c.github.io/uievents/TR.html https://w3c.github.io/DOM-Level-3-Events-code/TR.html

Re: PSA: publishing new WD of UI Events and D3E Keyboard specs April 28/30

2015-04-24 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 4/24/15 11:33 AM, Gary Kacmarcik (Кошмарчик) wrote: On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 7:26 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com mailto:art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: * The permissions of the specs' now obsolete Github repository will be set to read-only. s/Github/Mercurial/ ? Duh; what

Re: [admin] Registration for April 24 2015 Web Components f2f meeting; deadline April 10

2015-04-21 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 2/24/15 3:37 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: The registration page for the April 24 Web Components f2f meeting at Google's Mount View CA office is now open: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/42538/webcomponents-042015/ The meeting/agenda page is: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps

[admin] Updating our /TR stylesheets

2015-04-18 Thread Arthur Barstow
Below is an announcement about a project to provide a modern design to future technical reports published by the W3C i.e. updating the stylessheet used for Technical Report https://github.com/w3c/tr-design/blob/gh-pages/README.md . If you have any feedback, please use

PSA: publishing new WD of Clipboard APIs and events on April 21

2015-04-16 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi All, A new Working Draft publication of Clipboard APIs and events is planned for April 21 using the following version as the basis: https://w3c.github.io/clipboard-apis/TR.html If anyone has any major concerns about this, please reply right away. A few notes about this spec: * This

Re: PSA: publishing new WD of File API on April 21

2015-04-15 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 4/15/15 10:23 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: * This spec is now using Github https://w3c.github.io/FileAPI/ That repo is actually https://github.com/w3c/FileAPI/.

PSA: publishing new WD of File API on April 21

2015-04-15 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi All, A new Working Draft publication of File API is planned for April 21 using the following version as the basis: https://w3c.github.io/FileAPI/TR.html If anyone has any major concerns about this, please reply right away. A few notes about this spec: * This spec is now using Github

Re: PSA: publishing new WD of File API on April 21

2015-04-15 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 4/15/15 3:09 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: * This spec is now using Github https://w3c.github.io/FileAPI/ and the ED is https://w3c.github.io/FileAPI/Overview.html. PRs are welcome and encouraged. (I think it would

Re: PSA: publishing new WD of File API on April 21

2015-04-15 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 4/15/15 5:56 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: https://w3c.github.io/FileAPI/TR.html Note that this version appears to be based off the Overview-FAWD.xml file in the CVS repo, which hasn't been touched in 5 years

Re: PSA: publishing new WD of File API on April 21

2015-04-15 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 4/15/15 3:54 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: On 15 April 2015 at 07:26, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: * This spec is now using Github https://w3c.github.io/FileAPI/ That repo is actually https://github.com/w3c/FileAPI/. Since the most obvious github.io link is currently broken

RfC: LCWD of Media Capture and Streams; deadline May 15

2015-04-15 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi All, WebApps has been asked to review and submit comments for the April 14 Last Call Working Draft of WebRT and DAP's Media Capture and Streams spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-mediacapture-streams-20150414/ WebApps is specifically mentioned re the overall usage of Web IDL and the

PSA: Seeking feedback on W3C's Modern Tooling project

2015-04-14 Thread Arthur Barstow
[Bcc public-openw3c ] Hi All, In case you missed it, last February, Robin, Philippe and others (see [1] for a list of contributors) started a project to capture the state of the discussion about modernising the tooling that supports the making of W3C standards. The working document is

Re: WebIDL Plans

2015-04-13 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 4/12/15 2:44 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Yves Lafon yla...@w3.org wrote: We are planning to move WebIDL forward to REC, here is the plan to achieve that: Who is we? Apparently this wasn't even discussed with the editors. I consider Yves' posting [1] as a

PSA: publishing new WD of Gamepad on April 14

2015-04-09 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi All, A new Working Draft publication of Gamepad is planned for April 14 using the following version as the basis: https://w3c.github.io/gamepad/publish/gamepad.html If anyone has any major concerns about this, please reply right away. A few notes about this spec: * This spec is now

[gamepad] UA applied mapping cannot be escaped [Was: Re: PSA: publishing new WD of Gamepad on April 14]

2015-04-09 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 4/9/15 8:28 AM, Florian Bösch wrote: If my reading is correct, there is no provision to escape a mapping that the UA would apply? I've observed in the past that the mappings can go quite awry. Would it be possible to offer a way toggle off mapping on a gamepad? Hi Florian - I was about to

Reminder: [admin] Registration for April 24 2015 Web Components f2f meeting; deadline April 10

2015-04-07 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 2/24/15 3:37 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: The registration page for the April 24 Web Components f2f meeting at Google's Mount View CA office is now open: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/42538/webcomponents-042015/ The meeting/agenda page is: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps

PSA: publishing new WD of Input Method Editor (IME) API on April 9

2015-04-07 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi All, A new Working Draft publication of IME API is planned for April 9 using the following version as the basis: http://w3c.github.io/ime-api/TR.html If anyone has any major concerns about this, please reply right away. A few notes about this spec: * Travis is now the sole Editor of

PSA: publishing new WD of Quota Management API on April 9

2015-04-06 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi All, A new Working Draft publication of Quota Management API is planned for April 9 using the following version as the basis: https://w3c.github.io/quota-api/TR.html If anyone has any major concerns about this, please reply right away. Note this spec is now using Github

Re: [websockets] Test results available

2015-03-26 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 3/26/15 1:02 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: On 3/26/15 10:51 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: * All results http://w3c.github.io/test-results/websockets/all.html * 2 passes http://w3c.github.io/test-results/websockets/less-than-2.html Overall these results are pretty good: 97% of the 495 tests have

[websockets] Test results available

2015-03-26 Thread Arthur Barstow
Earlier today I ran the Web Sockets tests on Chrome 41, Chrome/Canary 43, FF Nightly 39, IE 11, and Opera 12 and pushed the results to the test-results repo: * All results http://w3c.github.io/test-results/websockets/all.html * 2 passes

Re: I18N comments on Manifest for Web applications

2015-03-25 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 3/24/15 3:07 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 3/24/15 10:21 AM, Richard Ishida wrote: is it possible to send mail to www-internatio...@w3.org each time someone adds somethign to the github issue? (this is the list where we track and discuss issues). if so, i see no real difference between

Re: CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28

2015-03-24 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 3/24/15 3:52 PM, Sigbjorn Finne wrote: Den 3/24/2015 20:37, Arthur Barstow skreiv: On 3/21/15 1:27 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Arthur Barstowart.bars...@gmail.com wrote: 2.http://www.w3c-test.org/webmessaging/without-ports/025.html; this test failure (which

Re: I18N comments on Manifest for Web applications

2015-03-24 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 3/24/15 10:21 AM, Richard Ishida wrote: is it possible to send mail to www-internatio...@w3.org each time someone adds somethign to the github issue? (this is the list where we track and discuss issues). if so, i see no real difference between using github or bugzilla – our process is

CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28

2015-03-21 Thread Arthur Barstow
As previously mentioned on [p-w], the test results for Web Messaging [All] indicate significant interoperability with only two tests that have less than two passes [2]. The two tests, including a short analysis of the failure, are: 1. http://www.w3c-test.org/webmessaging/with-ports/026.html;

Re: CfC: publish WG Note of UI Events; deadline November 14

2015-03-12 Thread Arthur Barstow
-uievents-20150317/. -Regards, ArtB [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2014OctDec/0039.html On 11/7/14 10:28 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: During WebApps' October 27 meeting, the participants agreed to stop work on the UI Events spec and to publish it as a WG Note (see [Mins

FYI: IETF Token Binding Working Group formed (tokbind)

2015-03-11 Thread Arthur Barstow
FYI (the IETF formally started the Token Binding Working Group). Forwarded Message Subject: WG Action: Formed Token Binding (tokbind) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:13:05 -0700 From: The IESG iesg-secret...@ietf.org Reply-To: i...@ietf.org To: IETF-Announce ietf-annou...@ietf.org

[admin] Registration for April 24 2015 Web Components f2f meeting; deadline April 10

2015-02-24 Thread Arthur Barstow
The registration page for the April 24 Web Components f2f meeting at Google's Mount View CA office is now open: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/42538/webcomponents-042015/ The meeting/agenda page is: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/WebComponentsApril2015Meeting. Please register by April 10.

Re: Web Components F2F in April 2015

2015-02-19 Thread Arthur Barstow
[ - the easily recognizable p-webapps subscribers ] On 2/18/15 12:50 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: Following Art's suggestion [1], I propose a Web Components-specific F2F with with the primary goal of reaching consensus on the Shadow DOM contentious bits [2]. When: Friday, April 24, 2015

Re: Staying on Topic [Was: Re: WebPortable/PlatformProprietary - An Established Concept]

2015-02-19 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 2/19/15 9:57 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: Where are you supposed to propose new APIs? Can such proposal be made by non-W3C members? This was a proposal for using Chrome Native Messaging as the foundation for a new standard. Perhaps you should pursue the Community Group process

Re: CORS explained simply

2015-02-19 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 2/19/15 4:28 PM, henry.st...@bblfish.net wrote: Hi, I find that understanding CORS is a really not easy. It seems that what is missing is an general overview document, that would start by explaining why the simplest possible method won't work, in order to help the user understand then why

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >