On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:11 AM, Yehuda Katz wyc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Domenic Denicola d...@domenic.me wrote:
I had a chat with Dmitry Lomov (V8 team/TC39, helped shape the new ES6
classes design, CC'ed). His perspective was helpful. He suggested a way
Hi Rick,
here are some clarifications.
There were many (long!) discussions on public-webapps about the new
signature for postMessage:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/thread.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/0304.html
(resending to list - Rick, sorry if you get this twice)
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Dmitry Lomov dslo...@chromium.org
wrote:
window.webkitPostMessage(msg, transferables) does not really exist
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
On 12/13/11 11:11 AM, Dmitry Lomov wrote:
worker.postMessage({p:port, ab:arrayBuffer}, [post, arrayBuffer])
work. Therefore this extension to postMessage semantics is both
backwards-compatible and consistent
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:41 PM, David Levin le...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:01 PM, David Levin le...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Dmitry Lomov dslo...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:41 PM, David Levin le...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote
:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Dmitry Lomov dslo...@google.com
wrote:
a) Recursive transfer lists. Allow arbitrary objects, not only
ArrayBuffers,
to appear in transfer lists. ArrayBuffers that are under objects in
transfer lists are transferred, others are cloned.
This again causes
