Re: Call for Consensus: Publish First Public Working Draft of FindText API, respond by 14 October

Hi, Raphaël– Yes, this is one narrowly-scoped piece of generalized functionality that we hope can get broad agreement and implementation. It's just one of the building blocks of a full set of robust anchoring features, some of which might be standardized, but which may actually be done in

Re: Call for Consensus: Publish First Public Working Draft of FindText API, respond by 14 October

ple to get in on this discussion. I'll point them to this thread. Regards– –Doug 2015年10月7日(水) 7:55 Doug Schepers <schep...@w3.org <mailto:schep...@w3.org>>: Hi, Tab– Thanks for the correction. I assumed that Houdini would expose more of the underpinnings of the ::se

Re: Call for Consensus: Publish First Public Working Draft of FindText API, respond by 14 October

Hi, Eliott– Good question. I don't have a great answer yet, but this is something that will need to be worked out with Shadow DOM, not just for this spec, but for Selection API and others, as well as to CSS, which has some Range-like styling. I don't know if this means a change to Shadow

Re: Call for Consensus: Publish First Public Working Draft of FindText API, respond by 14 October

can draw upon.) [1] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-pseudo-4/#highlight-selectors Regards– –Doug On 10/6/15 6:38 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Doug Schepers <schep...@w3.org> wrote: Hi, Eliott– Good question. I don't have a great answer yet, but this is som

Re: [charter] Addressable Ranges?

rather it were developed under the eyes of the WebApps WG. Any other details you need? Regards- -Doug On 5/14/14 8:54 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 4/25/14 8:44 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 4/22/14 9:40 AM, Doug Schepers wrote: Hi, Art– There are different approaches that could be taken

Re: [charter] Addressable Ranges?

for this functionality (that could help people get a bit deeper understanding of the proposal)? All - if you have any feedback - both positive/+1 or negative - please do speak up by April 25 at the latest. -Thanks, AB On 4/18/14 3:45 PM, Doug Schepers wrote: Hi, folks– I'd like to ask for feedback

[charter] Addressable Ranges?

Hi, folks– I'd like to ask for feedback on the notion of adding addressable ranges to the WebApps WG charter. There are a set of use cases for being able to link to a specific passage of text in a document, which has a number of what I consider hard problems: * the passage might cross

Call for Review: Web Audio API

/Use_Cases_and_Requirements Regards- -Doug Schepers On behalf of the Audio WG

Testing Expectations (was: Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech Javascript API - seeking feedback for eventual standardization)

Hi, folks- On 1/11/12 9:40 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 1/10/12 11:25 AM, ext Glen Shires wrote: Per #4 Testing commitment(s): can you elaborate on what you would like to see at this point? At this point, I think a `warm fuzzy` like if/when the spec advances to Candidate Recommendation, we

[editing] Feedback Link?

-webappsindex-type=tkeywords=[editing];public-webapps archive/a) [1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/editing/raw-file/tip/editing.html#status-of-this-document Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Developer Relations Project Coordinator, SVG, WebApps, Touch Events, and Audio WGs

Re: Mutation Observers: a replacement for DOM Mutation Events

Hi, Adam- I'm glad to see some progress on a replacement for Mutation Events. Would you be interested in being the editor for this spec? It's already in our charter, we just need someone to take it up. Olli has offered offlist to be a co-editor, so between the two of you, I think it would

Important: TPAC Registration

Hi, folks- In case you don't know, TPAC (Technical Plenary and Advisory Committee meeting) is W3C's yearly plenary meeting, where all the different working groups have a chance to come together, to schedule joint meetings, to collaborate in person, and to meet as groups. It's a really

Re: [editing] Using public-webapps for editing discussion

a bit... don't risk being seen as the guy who screams, Company X is evil!!!, because nobody listens to that guy. ^_^ Thanks- -Doug Schepers W3C Developer Outreach Project Coordinator, SVG, WebApps, Touch Events, and Audio WGs On 9/16/11 1:44 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote: On 9/15/2011 1:26 PM

Re: [DOM3Events] CR

suggest that any further improvements needed can be made in a later DOM spec. Can we simply move forward, please? [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Events/#webidl-definitions Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Developer Outreach Project Coordinator, SVG, WebApps, Touch Events, and Audio WGs

Re: [DOM3Events] CR

On 9/4/11 12:49 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote: Is there a wiki page or other resource for looking into implementation status on DOM3Events? It's a large spec, and I'd like to plan for it in our internal roadmap. We will be building a complete test suite and implementation report during CR

Mouse vs. Touch Events (was: [DOM3Events] CR)

Hi, Charles- (Renaming thread, because this is not relevant to moving DOM3 Events to CR) On 9/4/11 1:27 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote: On 9/4/11 10:06 AM, Doug Schepers wrote: On 9/4/11 12:49 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote: Is there a wiki page or other resource for looking into implementation

Re: [widgets]

Hi, Richard- Depending on your timeline, this could be a v2 feature... Any interest in following that up? Regards- -Doug Marcos Caceres wrote (on 5/20/11 3:47 PM): On 5/20/11 5:19 PM, Richard Felton wrote: Hi, Hopefully this is the right place to ask this question. I'm looking at the

Re: ISSUE-137 (IME-keypress): Should keypress events fire when using an IME? [DOM3 Events]

let us know if this satisfies your issue. Regards- -Doug Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker wrote (on 10/6/10 2:16 AM): ISSUE-137 (IME-keypress): Should keypress events fire when using an IME? [DOM3 Events] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/137 Raised by: Doug Schepers

Re: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2

amicably and productively. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, WebApps, and Web Events WGs

Re: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2

Events to seeing conflicting specifications. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, WebApps, and Web Events WGs Anne van Kesteren wrote (on 2/24/11 5:37 PM): On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:26:19 +0100, Adrian Bateman adria...@microsoft.com wrote: I'm concerned about the working group endorsing

Fullscreen API

://wiki.mozilla.org/Gecko:FullScreenAPI Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, WebApps, and Web Events WGs

Added 'locale' to Text, Keyboard, and Composition Events [ISSUE-119]

, nonCamelCased names, and it seems equally descriptive. Please let us know if this satisfies your issue. [1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DOM-Level-3-Events/html/DOM3-Events.html Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, WebApps, and Web Events WGs

Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers

/2009/WD-workers-20091222/ Regards- Doug Schepers, W3C Team Contact Art Barstow (Nokia), Co-Chair Charles McCathieNevile (Opera), Co-Chair,

Re: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers

Hi, Ian- Ian Hickson wrote (on 12/13/10 4:24 PM): On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Doug Schepers wrote: This is an active call for editors for the Server-sent Events [1], Web Storage [2], and Web Workers [3] specifications. If you are interested in becoming an editor, with all the rights

Re: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers

in helping co-edit these specs, please contact the chairs or myself, or say so on this list. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, WebApps, and Web Events WGs Ian Hickson wrote (on 12/13/10 6:05 PM): On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Doug Schepers wrote: Ian, the Technical Report work is what W3C does

Re: requestAnimationFrame

to avoid more painful chartering discussions.) I'm not trying to cut off conversation here, I just wanted to make sure people were aware. [1] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/fx/ Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, WebApps, and Web Events WGs Gregg Tavares (wrk) wrote (on 11/15/10 6:03 PM

Re: [Widgets] Mozilla open apps

://www.w3.org/2010/webapps/charter/Overview.html#widget-embedding Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: A URL API

proposal? [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGParam/ [2] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/modules/param/master/SVGParam.html [3] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/modules/param/master/SVGParamPrimer.html Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs Adam Barth wrote (on 9/17/10 2:05 PM): On Fri, Sep 17, 2010

DOM3 Events Comments

to change the TO: field to www-...@w3.org (though you should feel free to BCC public-webapps if you like). That will make it much easier to track the issues. Thanks- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting

Hi, Art- I would like for us to talk about DOM3 Events. I am not sure how much time this would take up. I'm neutral on when it happens. Thanks- -Doug Arthur Barstow wrote (on 8/31/10 7:31 AM): The WebApps WG will meet face-to-face November 1-2 as part of the W3C's 2010 TPAC meeting week

Re: ISSUE-122 (add mousewheel): Consider adding 'mousewheel' again [DOM3 Events]

- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: XBL2

, or if there isn't one, could you start one? Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: CfC: to publish a Last Call Working Draft of DOM 3 Events; deadline September 3

Hi, Anne- Anne van Kesteren wrote (on 8/29/10 4:07 AM): On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:48:18 +0200, Doug Schepers schep...@w3.org wrote: There are still still some outstanding issues, which we intend to address in LC; many of them are marked up specifically to solicit wider review and comments, which

Re: CfC: to publish a Last Call Working Draft of DOM 3 Events; deadline September 3

and a half, and will probably not be very responsive.) Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Goodbye

Hi, Robert- Nice to have worked with you. Good luck in your future endeavors. Regards- -Doug Ennals, Robert wrote (on 7/8/10 5:02 PM): Hi Guys, I have chosen to leave Intel and so will no longer be representing Intel in the HTML or WebApps working groups. The other Intel reps in the HTML WG

OFF TOPIC: SVG Progress Contest

Hey, folks- Sorry to spam this list, but I thought that folks who are familiar with the new progress events might be interested in applying those skills to SVG. This is a fun contest with some great prizes for making an SVG progress indicator. The contest ends in a couple days, so don't

Re: [widgets] Zip vs GZip Tar

for increasing the applicability of the Widgets specs in multiple scenarios and platforms. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010AprJun/0349.html [2] http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-May/026488.html Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Client side JavaScript i18n API

. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Items not listed as new in the draft charter

/webapps/wiki/Charter Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Items not listed as new in the draft charter

, it would be best to have your AC rep describe them in the normal course of AC review, or to discuss them in the AC forum? Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs Maciej Stachowiak wrote (on 3/29/10 2:40 PM): On Mar 29, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Doug Schepers wrote: Hi, Folks

Re: Event handlers - Pointer Devices

, and this should help frame a successful outcome for this spec. [1] http://www.w3.org/2009/05/DeviceAPICharter Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Notifications

started a simple wiki page to kick this off: http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Web_Notifications Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs Drew Wilson wrote (on 2/23/10 5:26 PM): 2010/2/23 Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc The same is not true for the suggest notification

Re: Notifications

should design for the future, in any case, and not limit ourselves to simple text notifications. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) wrote (on 2/23/10 1:06 PM): This thread seems to have languished, and I'm trying to figure out how to move forward here

Re: Notifications

it was an informed decision. I agree with the simplicity goal. Fallbacks and defaults make a lot of sense to me. I'll noodle a bit and see if I can come up with a simple mechanism, but I'm probably happier reviewing other people's proposals. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG

Re: Notifications

Doug Schepers wrote (on 2/23/10 2:43 PM): HTML is a little bit more widely adopted than SVG (I suspect that there are 10x as many HTML documents as SVG documents on the Web). I've been told offlist that it may not be obvious that I was joking here... 10x is an absurdly low figure... HTML

Re: How do I join this list?

Hi, David- Like that. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: How do I join this list?

Hi, David- More specifically, you simply send an email to public-webapps-requ...@w3.org with the subject line subscribe. The archives are here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/ Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Social APIs (was: Rechartering WebApp WG)

that it works well with Widgets. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs Scott Wilson wrote (on 2/13/10 5:21 AM): Hi Doug, I'm not adamant that these requirements are met specifically just for Widgets, just that these are where the current use-cases come from

Re: Window id - an idea to make multi page web application easier

is in our new draft charter. It needs to address resource discoverability, which your proposal might be part of. [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/webapps/charter/Overview.html Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Rechartering WebApp WG

and requirements you have for this social API are? [1] http://dev.w3.org/html5/postmsg/ [2] http://dev.w3.org/html5/websockets/ [3] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest/ [4] http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/contacts/ Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs Scott Wilson

Re: Rechartering WebApp WG

Hi, Art- Thanks for the feedback. Arthur Barstow wrote (on 2/9/10 9:34 AM): On Feb 8, 2010, at 7:25 AM, ext Doug Schepers wrote: We are interested in comments to refine the charter before submitting it to the Advisory Committee and W3C management for review. [1] http://www.w3.org/2010

Re: Rechartering WebApp WG

, and having integrated the feedback from the discussions on member-webapps and public-webapps, I would like to move ahead with W3M review, so we can get this in front of the Advisory Committee for further consideration. [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/webapps/charter/Overview.html Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C

Re: Rechartering WebApp WG

Hi, Anne- Thanks for your feedback. Anne van Kesteren wrote (on 2/11/10 11:06 AM): On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:58:40 +0100, Doug Schepers schep...@w3.org wrote: [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/webapps/charter/Overview.html Sorry for being late. NP, just in time. Should it say DOM Level 4 Core

[widgets] Applying Stylesheets to Resources

resource without touching that file itself. Mix this with parameters (something we are working on in SVG and CSS), and it's a nice model. Is it possible to add something like this? Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: [widgets] Applying Stylesheets to Resources

Hi, Boris- Boris Zbarsky wrote (on 2/11/10 12:04 PM): On 2/11/10 11:57 AM, Doug Schepers wrote: One odd part of the separation of content and presentation is that a stylesheet is applied to a file by including a link to the stylesheet in the target file. That is totally backward. Strictly

Re: Rechartering WebApp WG

it should be the previous version of the Web Apps WG charter, It hink. Corrected. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Rechartering WebApp WG

. friends, friends-of) Are these deliverables the Widgets folks are willing to take on? If so, are there clear use case requirements documents, and available editing resources? Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Rechartering WebApp WG

://www.w3.org/2010/webapps/charter/Overview.html Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: [widgets] Null in PC

the implementation language and the content language... the content should not get a '0', right? It should get 'null', I'd think. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: MPEG-U

Hi, Cyril- Cyril Concolato wrote (on 1/20/10 12:24 AM): Le 13/01/2010 19:59, Doug Schepers a écrit : Cyril Concolato wrote (on 1/13/10 10:37 AM): Yes, you're right, the problem is that liaisons usually are not considered as public documents so the secretariat or MPEG members

Re: [selectors-api] comments on Selectors API Level 2

to see emails from people on the CSS WG who are unpleasantly surprised by developments in the Selectors API spec. This requires more than the usual inter-group review. Please let me know how I can help facilitate this. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs Daniel Glazman

Re: MPEG-U

to make sure that the process is understood and accepted, before sending the liaison itself. Could you please request that right away? I know you are doing what you can to make sure the communication channels are clear, so I appreciate your help. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG

Spam Alert (was: Warning Notice!!!)

, for your own security. I'm sure I don't have to tell you this, but never send a stranger your username, password, phone number, or date of birth. You can, however, send me your bank account information... trust me... :) Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs W3 Online Team

Fwd: [office] Public Review of OpenDocument Version 1.2

Hi, WebApps folks (particularly Widgets folks)- The ODF 1.2 packaging specification has just been released for public review at OASIS. I'm forwarding the announcement for those of you who might be interested in reviewing it, given the overall similarities to Widgets packaging. Regards-

Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely

of the browser (be it a desktop or mobile). Please send in use cases, requirements, concerns, and concrete suggestions about the general topic (regardless of your opinion about my suggestion). [1] http://www.w3.org/2009/11/02-dap-irc#T20-40-39-1 Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG

Travel Notification: Expect Delayed Responses

. My apologies in advance for slow response times. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Changes to DOM3 Events Key Identifiers

have to wait for the next version, but send them on anyway.) [1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DOM-Level-3-Events/html/DOM3-Events.html#keyset [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/svgudom.html#KeyIdentifiersSet Regards- -Doug Schepers, on behalf of the WebApps WG Editor, DOM Level 3 Events W3C

Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns

Hi, David-Sarah- David-Sarah Hopwood wrote (on 10/24/09 2:45 AM): Doug Schepers wrote: I'm not at all a security expert, or even particularly well-informed on the topic, but it does occur to me that most of CORS' opponents seem very much in the capability-based security camp [1], and may

CORS Best PRactices (was: [cors] unaddressed security concerns)

not to do with CORS (and cross-site scripting in general), which W3C could host alongside CORS, to get the right messages out there. If the security community is willing to write up articles as well, W3C would be happy to link to or host that material. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG

Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns

Hi, Maciej- Maciej Stachowiak wrote (on 10/24/09 4:42 PM): On Oct 24, 2009, at 10:03 AM, Adam Barth wrote: On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Doug Schepers schep...@w3.org mailto:schep...@w3.org wrote: Sorry for being dense, but why couldn't the whitehats build toy systems on an open

Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns

the kinds of things one can evaluate with a honeypot-type contest. They're worried about what web developers will build if we give them CORS as a tool. Sorry for being dense, but why couldn't the whitehats build toy systems on an open honeynet? Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG

Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns

, and learn later from our mistakes how to improve the situation. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children

Hey- Maciej Stachowiak wrote (on 10/20/09 4:42 PM): On Oct 18, 2009, at 4:14 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Doug Schepers schep...@w3.org mailto:schep...@w3.org wrote: So, rather than dwell on an admittedly imperfect spec, I personally suggest that we urge WebKit

childElements, childElementCount, and children (was: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?)

. What is the purpose of childElementCount? One comment response from you (Doug Schepers):- | While many uses of Element Traversal do not require this attribute, I | speak from personal developer experience when I confirm that it is | useful. Does not describe the problem that childElementCount

Re: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?

Hi, Anne- Anne van Kesteren wrote (on 10/17/09 2:33 AM): On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:46:56 +0200, Doug Schepers schep...@w3.org wrote: Sorry for the tardy response. This was an unfortunate oversight. I've now added this to the proposed errata [1]. Please let me know if this suits your needs. [1

Re: Touch and gestures events

suppose you have Mac binaries? What sort of hardware is needed to support it? Are there any restrictions on the OS level, or can you enable multitouch on any OS? Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs kari.hiit...@nokia.com wrote (on 10/15/09 10:33 AM): Hi, I suppose

Re: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?

Hi, Michael- Sorry for the tardy response. This was an unfortunate oversight. I've now added this to the proposed errata [1]. Please let me know if this suits your needs. [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/12/REC-ElementTraversal-20081222-errata#S1 Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG

Re: Web IDL and the New Scripting Coordination List

IDL or just coordination-related discussions re Web IDL? FWIW, I prefer all Web IDL. Yes, I've talked with Cameron about this, and public-script-coord is intended for all Web IDL discussions, not just coordination between WGs or other standards bodies. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact

New Scripting Coordination List Set Up

://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-script-coord/ [2] http://www.w3.org/Mail/Request [3] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/aa/ Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Let's set up a mailing list for coordination with ECMA and Web IDL discussion

with significant and substantive feature requests, of course. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs Arthur Barstow wrote (on 9/27/09 5:24 PM): On Sep 27, 2009, at 7:33 PM, ext Maciej Stachowiak wrote: ECMA TC39 (the group responsible for ECMAScript) has expressed

CfC: Event Namespaces Removed

/html/DOM3-Events.html Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Focus and focus()/blur() [ISSUE-102]

Hi, Folks- I plan to tackle this issue soon. If you have any thoughts about it, I'd appreciate your feedback before I get to it. Please respond directly to this message, or send a message to www-dom with [ISSUE-102] in the subject line so Tracker finds it. Thanks! Regards- -Doug Schepers

Marked addEventListenerNS and removeEventListenerNS At Risk

/NodeEventTarget.html#addEventListenerNS%28java.lang.String,%20java.lang.String,%20org.w3c.dom.events.EventListener,%20boolean,%20java.lang.Object%29 [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-events/ Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Web IDL for our API spec.

the specifications using it. It is an abstraction layer, Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: DOM3EV: [ViewModes] typeArg on initXXXEvent

using the shortest name that still conveys what the event is meant to do. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: addEventListener naming

adding it, and solve other problems than just the length of the method name. We are winding down on new features for DOM3 Events (trying to get it out the door), but if there's a lot of implementer enthusiasm on this, we could put it in. Any implementers care to chime in? Regards- -Doug Schepers

Re: Specs using Web IDL

. Yes, it seems pretty clear to me that it should be normative. The Process is flexible enough with regards to Rec-track deliverables that it allows us to decide what the best way for this spec to be demonstrably baked. Cameron McCormack wrote (on 6/28/09 7:21 AM): Doug Schepers: As we

Re: Specs using Web IDL

Hi, again- Oops, email sent too soon... I need to disable the keyboard shortcut for Send on Thunderbird, it's very annoying. Email finished inline Doug Schepers wrote (on 6/28/09 3:37 PM): Hi, Cam- Cameron McCormack wrote (on 6/28/09 7:10 AM): Robin Berjon: I wonder what the value

Berkeley DB (was: Points of order on this WG)

by changing the license? Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Points of order on this WG

that we agree are important for the web than further specification work. Actually, I think that's an excellent point. Nikunj, maybe that is the next logical step? Could you take charge of that? Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Points of order on this WG

the best way forward is here. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: 'scroll' and 'resize' events

/0124.html Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Agenda:DOM3 Events Telcon

+ diagrams * Event wording [1] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2009month=6day=17hour=21min=0sec=0p1=43p2=101p3=234p4=240 Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Next DOM3 Events Telcon (Time and Day?)

/meetingdetails.html?year=2009month=6day=17hour=21min=0sec=0p1=43p2=101p3=234p4=240 [3] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DOM-Level-3-Events/proposals/d3e-keyflow.svg [4] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DOM-Level-3-Events/proposals/keyflow-gecko.svg Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

[widgets] Open in Browser?

are related? I'm thinking that a downloaded and saved file might reuse the widget mechanisms, but with an optional flag that indicates it might be opened directly in an application (like a browser or authoring tool) rather than (or in addition to) a standalone miniapp. Regards- -Doug Schepers

Working Vacation

Hi, WebApps and SVG- Just to let you know, I will be away for the next week-and-a-half, for a conference and a short vacation. I will still be checking my email periodically, but I may not respond very quickly. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Web Storage Scope and Charter

Hi, Nikunj- Nikunj Mehta wrote (on 4/24/09 2:24 AM): On Apr 23, 2009, at 1:04 PM, Doug Schepers wrote: Rather than change the charter (which would require everyone who's already rejoined to re-rejoin at the simplest, and might require another AC review at the worst), Nikunj offered that he

Re: addEventListener naming

its own remover? Is it worth thinking about simply adding an optional parameter to el.listen( evtname, function(e) {}, number-of-times-to-listen )? (Probably not.) Listing some use cases for it might help this along. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Web Storage Scope and Charter (was: CfC: FPWD of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers; deadline April 10)

to the WG as a whole, I would ask that a message similar to the above be put in a prominent place in the spec. This seems like the soundest way forward. Art, Chaals, care to chime in? Other comments on this matter? Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs Jonas Sicking

Re: Web Storage Scope and Charter

Hi, Ian- Ian Hickson wrote (on 4/23/09 4:18 PM): On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Doug Schepers wrote: Jonas and others seem to support broadening the scope, and I've also been reading various posts in the blogosphere that also question whether SQL is the right choice (I see a lot of support for JSON

  1   2   >