On Sep 22, 2010, at 4:53 PM, Klotz, Leigh wrote:
We applaud the desire of the HTML5 WG to incorporate aspects of XBL
into
HTML5. Even if it is reduced from XBL and XBL2, having such
facilities
in HTML5 will still help others using layered implementation
technology
of which HTML5 is one
A version of this message was previously sent by W3C Team request to a
members-only list.
At Art Barstow's request, I am sending the message to public-webapps,
with
all members-only content removed and all technical comments preserved.
I have also corrected one typo, where XForms was typed in
Additionally, I would like to point out Robin Cover's XML Cover Pages
newsletter from OASIS today cites this paper, which shows usage of XBL
and XForms:
http://xml.coverpages.org/newsletter/news2010-09-21.html
http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/3916
Leigh.
degree of work
required. I don't see what harm comes from waiting to advance this XHR
document until the necessary work has been done.
Leigh.
-Original Message-
From: Henri Sivonen [mailto:hsivo...@iki.fi]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 12:12 AM
To: Klotz, Leigh
Cc: Anne van Kesteren
Jonas,
Thank you for your response; comments below:
-Original Message-
From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:jo...@sicking.cc]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 9:22 AM
To: Klotz, Leigh
Cc: Henri Sivonen; Anne van Kesteren; WebApps WG; Forms WG
Subject: Re: XMLHttpRequest
Jonas,
I apologize if you and other group members consider this to be a pedantic
exercise, but it's a necessary part of making the specification reusable.
-Original Message-
From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:jo...@sicking.cc]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 9:45 AM
To: Klotz
-Original Message-
From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:jo...@sicking.cc]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 10:54 AM
To: Klotz, Leigh
Cc: Henri Sivonen; Anne van Kesteren; WebApps WG; Forms WG
Subject: Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG
...snip
And then go on to cite
representation of the Forms WG comment, which is
about the issue, not about its solutions.
-Original Message-
From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:jo...@sicking.cc]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 11:06 AM
To: Klotz, Leigh
Cc: Henri Sivonen; Anne van Kesteren; WebApps WG; Forms WG
Subject: Re
-Original Message-
From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:jo...@sicking.cc]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 11:33 AM
To: Klotz, Leigh
Cc: Henri Sivonen; Anne van Kesteren; WebApps WG; Forms WG
Subject: Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG
On Thu, Dec 17
that document needs to have a better title than Web Addresses
in HTML5 if it's already in use in user agents in practice in web reality?
Thank you,
Leigh.
-Original Message-
From: Boris Zbarsky [mailto:bzbar...@mit.edu]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 2:17 PM
To: Klotz, Leigh
Cc
[mailto:bzbar...@mit.edu]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 2:38 PM
To: Klotz, Leigh
Cc: WebApps WG; Forms WG
Subject: Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG
On 12/17/09 2:22 PM, Klotz, Leigh wrote:
Thank you for the clarification. Surely then this ought to be fixed
with an IETF or W3C
OK, so is the conclusion that XHR is implementable only in HTML5 and should be
re-titled XMLHttpRequest in HTML5 or something similar?
-Original Message-
From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:jo...@sicking.cc]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 3:14 PM
To: Klotz, Leigh
Cc: Boris Zbarsky; WebApps
van Kesteren [mailto:ann...@opera.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 6:54 AM
To: Klotz, Leigh; WebApps WG
Cc: Forms WG
Subject: Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:46:59 +0100, Klotz, Leigh leigh.kl...@xerox.com
wrote:
This comment on XMLHttpRequest [1
I'll take this as a No and we'll discuss it in the Forms WG next year when we
pick up again.
Happy Holidays, Ian, Anne, and all.
Leigh.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Hickson [mailto:i...@hixie.ch]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 11:54 AM
To: Klotz, Leigh
Cc: Anne van Kesteren
, December 16, 2009 12:04 PM
To: Klotz, Leigh
Cc: Ian Hickson; Anne van Kesteren; WebApps WG; Forms WG
Subject: Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG
Note that just referring to a few specific concepts defined in HTML5 does not
force anyone to implement the rest of HTML5. As things stand right
, Leigh
Cc: Anne van Kesteren; WebApps WG; Forms WG
Subject: RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Klotz, Leigh wrote:
Therefore, even in the light of the changes in details I've cited
(and your kind corrections for my errors and outdated
imformation), our
This comment on XMLHttpRequest [1] is from the Forms WG.
A standalone W3C Recommendation-track document is welcome, particularly because
of the statement in [2] The goal of this specification is to document a
minimum set of interoperable features based on existing implementations,
allowing Web
: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 12:54 PM
To: Klotz, Leigh
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org; Forms WG
Subject: Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG
On 11/25/09 3:46 PM, Klotz, Leigh wrote:
The XMLHttpRequest functionality described in this document has
previously been well isolated, and in fact
-requ...@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Klotz, Leigh
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 1:27 PM
To: Boris Zbarsky
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org; Forms WG
Subject: RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG
Boris,
Thank you for your response. I appreciate your asking the clarifying
questions. I'll put some
19 matches
Mail list logo
